Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.11307 OF2016[Arising out of SLP [C]. No.30998 of 2010]. Ravindra Ramchandra Waghmare . Appellant Vs. Indore Municipal Corporation & Ors. .Respondents WITH Civil Appeal No.11308 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.31541/2011), Civil Appeal Nos.11309-11316 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. Nos. 469- 476/2016), Civil Appeal Nos. 11317-11318 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. Nos. 416- 417/2016), Civil Appeal Nos.11319-11324/2016(Arising out of SLP [C]. Nos. 14502- 14507/2016), Civil Appeal No.11325 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.15380/2016), Civil Appeal No.11326 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.14531/2016), Civil Appeal Nos.11327-330 of 2016(Arising out of SLP [C]. Nos.14493- 14496/2016), Civil Appeal No.11331 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.15421/2016), Civil Appeal No.11332 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.16750/2016), Civil Appeal No.11333 of 2016 (Arising out of SLP [C]. No.16827/2016), ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
(Reportable) IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.9442/ 2016 (Arising out of SLP (Civil) No.31025/2013) Jagdish Narain Shukla ...Appellant Vs. State of U.P. and Others. Respondents JUDGMENT A.M. KHANWILKAR, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal challenges the decision of the Division Bench of the High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow dated 16th July, 2012 in Writ Petition No.5744 of 2012.3. The appellant had filed writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India as Public Interest Litigation praying for implementation of the recommendation/report of the Lokayukta Uttar Pradesh, dated 22nd February, 2012. Following reliefs were prayed in the said writ petition:Wherefore, it is most respectfully prayed that the Honble Court may kindly be pleased, in the interest of justice, to Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus, directing the Opposite Parties Nos.1, 2 and 3 to implement the recommendations/report of the Opposite ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
Reportable IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISIDCTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 6203-6204__OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos. 1259-1260 of 2016) Nabam Rebia, and Bamang Felix Appellants versus Deputy Speaker and others Respondents JUDGMENT Jagdish Singh Khehar, J.1. Leave granted.2. The 5th session of the Arunachal Pradesh Legislative Assembly (hereinafter referred to as, the Assembly/House) was concluded on 21.10.2015. On 3.11.2015, the Governor issued an order summoning the 6th session of the Assembly, to meet on 14.1.2016 in the Legislative Assembly Chamber at Naharlagun. The instant order was passed by the Governor, on the aid and advice of the Chief Minister, and in consultation with the Speaker of the House. The 6th session of the House was preponed by the Governor from 14.1.2016 to 16.12.2015, by an order dated 9.12.2015 indicating inter alia the manner in which the proceedings of the House should be conducted. In its support, the Governor issued a message on 9.12.2015....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.3608 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.1490 of 2015) State of Kerala & Ors. ..Appellants VERSUS M/s Kerala Rare Earth & Minerals Limited & Ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3609 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P.(C) No.1840 of 2015) State of Kerala & Ors. ..Appellants VERSUS M/s. Kerala Rare Earths & Minerals Limited & Ors. ..Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3610 OF2016(Arising out of S.L.P(C) No.1914 of 2015) State of Kerala & Ors. ..Appellants VERSUS M/s. Kerala Rare Earths & Minerals Limited & Ors. ..Respondents JUDGMENT T.S. THAKUR, CJI.1. Leave granted.2. These appeals arise out of a common judgment and order dated 13th November, 2014 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam, whereby, Writ Appeals Nos.1610, 1611 and 1621 of 2014 filed by the appellants-State of Kerala have been dismissed affirming thereby an order passed by a Single Bench of that Court, allowing the writ petitions filed b...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
|REPORTABLE | IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 3019-3020 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C.) Nos. 14705-14706 of 2015) ANDHRA PRADESH STATE COUNCIL OF HIGHER EDUCATION APPELLANT Vs. UNION OF INDIA & ORS. ETC. RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.3021 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (C.) No.14712 of 2015) JUDGMENT V. GOPALA GOWDA, J.Leave granted in the Special Leave Petitions. The present appeals arise out of the common impugned judgment and order dated 01.05.2015 passed by the High Court of judicature at Hyderabad for the States of Telangana and Andhra Pradesh in Writ Petition Nos. 1873 and 2882 of 2015, wherein it was held that the assets, properties and funds lying at the present location of the Andhra Pradesh State Education Council of Higher Education now belong exclusively to the Telangana State Education Council for Higher Education. The relevant facts which are required for us to appreciate the rival legal contentions are stated in brief hereunder: ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL/CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL No.52 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8060 of 2015) VISHAL N. KALSARIA APPELLANT Vs. BANK OF INDIA & ORS. RESPONDENTS with CRIMINAL APPEAL No.53 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8064 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.54 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8063 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.55 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8062 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.56 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8066 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.57 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8067 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.58 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8068 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.59 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.8069 of 2015) CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 414-415 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(C) Nos.13295-13296 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.753 OF2014CRIMINAL APPEAL No.754 OF2014CRIMINAL APPEAL No.62 OF2016(Arising out of SLP(Crl) No.6944 of 2015) CRIMINAL APPEAL No.63 OF2016(Arising out of SLP (Crl) No.6945 of 2015) CIVIL APP...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL ORIGINAL JURISDICTION TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.91 OF2015(Arising out of Transfer Petition (Civil) No.707 of 2012) Reserve Bank of India ..Petitioner(s) versus Jayantilal N. Mistry ..Respondent(s) With TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.92 OF2015(Arising out of Transfer Petition (Civil) No.708 of 2012) I.C.I.C.I Bank Limited .. Petitioner(s) versus S.S. Vohra and others Respondent(s) TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.93 OF2015(Arising out of Transfer Petition (Civil) No.711 of 2012) National Bank for Agriculture and Rural Development Petitioner(s) versus Kishan Lal Mittal Respondent(s) TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.94 OF2015(Arising out of Transfer Petition (Civil) No.712 of 2012) Reserve Bank of India .Petitioner(s) versus P.P. Kapoor .Respondent(s) TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No.95 OF2015(Arising out of Transfer Petition (Civil) No.713 of 2012) Reserve Bank of India .Petitioner(s) versus Subhas Chandra Agrawal .Respondent(s) TRANSFERRED CASE (CIVIL) No....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.2789 OF2007|COMMISSIONER OF CENTRAL EXCISE, CHENNAI |...APPELLANT | |VERSUS | | |M/S. NEBULAE HEALTH CARE LTD. |...RESPONDENTS | W I T H CIVIL APPEAL No.1142 OF2009JUDGMENT A.K. SIKRI, J.Delay condoned. These appeals raise an issue of eligibility of concession/exemption from excise duty that is provided under Notification nos. 8/1999, 8/2000, 8/2001, 8/2002 and 8/2003 to the Small Scale Industrial Units (for short, 'SSI Units'). It is not in dispute that the respondents assessees in these appeals fulfill eligibility conditions for availing the benefit of SSI exemption under the aforesaid Notifications. However, in addition to manufacturing goods on their own account, they are also doing job work of manufacturing goods of certain other parties on job work basis. The goods manufactured for third parties bear the brand name of those third parties and in respect of such goods manufactured for third parti...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.8958 OF2003M/s. Satnam Overseas Ltd. Appellant(s) VERSUS Commnr. Of Central Excise, New Delhi. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT A.K.SIKRI,J.The appellant/assessee challenges the correctness and validity of the final order dated 10.10.2002 passed by the Customs, Excise and Gold (Control) Appellate Tribunal (CEGAT), New Delhi in the appeal which was preferred by the assessee against the order of Commissioner (Appeals) who had upheld the Order-in-Original dated 17.3.1999 passed by the Additional Commissioner pursuant to show cause notice dated 4.8.1997 issued by him. In the said show cause notice the Additional Commissioner had proposed to classify the product of the appellant/assessee under Heading 2108 of the Central Excise Tariff Act, 1985, as Miscellaneous Edible preparation not elsewhere specified or included. It may be stated that assessee is engaged in the packing combination of mixture of raw rice, dehydra...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CRIMINAL APPEAL NOS.2329-2331 OF2009State of Punjab .. Appellant versus Jagga Singh Etc. .. Respondents WITH CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2327 OF2009AND CRIMINAL APPEAL NO.2328 OF2009JUDGMENT C. NAGAPPAN, J.All these criminal appeals have arisen out of the common judgment dated 17.09.2007 passed by the High Court of Punjab and Haryana at Chandigarh. The appellants/accused in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2327 and 2328 of 2009 numbering 2, and the respondents/accused in Criminal Appeal Nos. 2329-2331 of 2009 herein numbering 5, were the accused in sessions case Nos. 14,15 and 16 of 2003 on the file of Additional Sessions Judge, Ludhiana and the first two of them were convicted for the offences under Section 302 IPC and Section 25 of the Arms Act and sentenced to undergo imprisonment for life each and to pay a fine of Rs.2000/- each with default sentence for the offence of murder and further sentenced to undergo rigorous imprisonment ...
Tag this Judgment!