Court : Supreme Court of India
..... between the ages of 4 and 18 years from their irreclaimable parents and place them in specially established reformatory settlements .163 160 criminal tribes (lower provinces) act extension act, 1876 161 ibid 162 the criminal tribes enquiry committee report (1949-50), https://ia802807.us.archive.org/11/items/dli.csl.944/944.pdf, p. ..... impugned provisions ...................................................................................... 88 2 xiv. prison manuals and the legacy of discrimination ........................................ 105 xv. model prison manual 2016: whether adequate?. ......................................... 125 xvi. model prisons and correctional services act, 2023 ..................................... 132 xvii. the continued targeting of denotified tribes .............................................. 134 xviii. the role of legal service authorities in prisons....................................... 138 xix. the future of substantive equality & institutional .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... 17 required a sanction from the central government or the authorised officer to initiate prosecution. 14. the parliament, in 2008, while enacting amending act 35 of 2008 had consciously incorporated the provision requiring a recommendation from an authority and retained the requirement of sanction from the appropriate government, ..... therein, recommended for sanction for prosecution against the above mentioned accused persons/entities under the relevant sections of law including the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967; 7. and now, therefore, the central government, after carefully examining the material placed on record and the recommendations of the authority, ..... of the sanction order:- 5. and whereas, the central government in terms of the provisions of section 45(2) of the unlawful activities (prevention) act, 1967 (as amended) and the unlawful activities (prevention) (recommendation and sanction of prosecution) rules, 2008 referred the above mentioned investigation report vide .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... is of relevance while considering whether section 15 of the pocso can be invoked or not. d. scope of section 67b of the it act.144. the it act was originally enacted with the object of providing a legal framework for inter-alia recognizing electronic records & digital signatures, facilitating electronic commerce, ..... presumption under section 54 of the act can only be raised after the prosecution has established that the accused was found to be in possession of the contraband in a search conducted in accordance with the mandate of section 50. (emphasis supplied) 162. in seema silk sarees v. directorate of enforcement ..... reported in (2008) 5 scc580 although the provision involved therein is not pari materia with section 30 of the pocso, yet the observations made by this court are relevant to the issue involved in the case at hand. therein this court whilst upholding the constitutional validity of section 18 of the foreign exchange regulation act .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... invoking section 319 crpc, is only a device by which the respondent seeks to initiate prosecution against dakshin beyond the period of limitation stipulated under the act.26. no doubt section 142 authorises the court to condone the delay in appropriate cases. we find no reason to condone the delay. the justification ..... . hence the instant slp.25. the question whether the respondent had sufficient cause for not filing the complaint against dakshin within the period prescribed under the act is not examined by either of the courts below. as rightly pointed out, the application, which is the subject-matter of the instant appeal purportedly filed ..... through its branch manager, was served solely to simaiya hariramani, the authorised signatory of the firm. the complaint dated 07th december 2015 under section 138 of the ni act before the court of judicial magistrate, balodabazar, chhattisgarh, was made against simaiya hariramani and the appellant. thus, in the present case, the firm has not .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka
..... s/o late narayana udupa, aged about61years, pilathabettu village, bantwala taluk, post:punjalakatte-574233, d.k. district, (reg. under karnataka co-operative society act, 1959) senior citizen benefit not claimed. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... keshava gowda karmaje, s/o krishnappa gowda, aged about60years, chokkady, sullia taluk, post: kukkujadka-574212, dk district, reg. under karnataka co-op. society act, 1959, (senior citizen benefit not claimed) ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary ..... president ramakrishna rai s/o manjunatha rai, aged about54years, yedamangala , kadaba taluk, post: yedamangala - 574221, d k district, reg. under karnataka co-operative society act. ...petitioner (by sri a. keshava bhat, advocate) and:1. the state of karnataka, represented by its secretary, department of parliamentary affairs and legislation, vidhana .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . only if the candidates from these categories are 27 section 4(5) of the punjab scheduled castes and backward classes (reservation in services) act, 2006 (punjab act no.22 of 2006). 257 available, the seats would go to these categories. on account of non-availability of the candidates from these categories ..... three - judge bench of this court was called upon to adjudicate on the validity of the andhra pradesh scheduled castes (rationalisation of reservations) act 2000. the act was enacted following the recommendations of the ramachandran raju commission constituted by the state government. the commission was tasked with ascertaining the groups among the ..... nalakeyava valmiki godari nayadi vettuvan godda paga dai (2) scheduled castes throughout the province except in any special constituency constituted under the government of india act, 1935, for the election of a representative of backward areas and backward tribes to the legislative assembly of the province :- aranadan kattunayakan kuruman .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... provisions inconsistent with the enactment.7260. in agricultural market committee v. shalimar chemical works ltd.,73 the andhra pradesh (agricultural produce and livestock) markets act 1966 allowed the market committee to levy market fees on all transactions of purchase and sale provided the transactions took place within the notified market area ..... and complete implementation of the enactment. in dr haniraj l chulani v. bar council of maharashtra and goa, this court held that the advocates act provides a complete code for regulating the legal education and professional qualifications of an aspirant seeking entry into the legal profession.33 iii. delegated legislation ..... , staff salaries, infrastructure maintenance and technological advancements. inadequate funding will hinder the ability of sbcs to comply with their statutory obligations under the advocates act; 9 part c b. the enrollment fee prescribed under section 24(1)(f) was fixed by the legislature in 1993 and has not been modified .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Karnataka Dharwad
..... ', 'primitive' and of 'baneful nature'. the system, which is nothing but an improved version of bonded-labour, is sought to be abolished by the act. the act is an important piece of social legislation for the welfare of labourers and has to be liberally construed. (c) in the case of secretary, h.s ..... the mandate of the constitution pertaining to public appointments?.18. necessary also to refer to the provisions of the karnataka transparency in public procurement act, 1999 (for short the act, 1999 ) which mandates ensuring transparency in the public procurement of goods and services by streamlining the procedure in inviting, processing an acceptance ..... principal employer is the intermediary contractor and because of this intermediary the employer is treated as principal employer with various statutory obligations flowing from the act in connection with regulation of the working conditions of the contract labourers who are brought by the intermediary contractor on the principal's establishment .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
..... . an explanation to the said section was added and was deemed always to have been incorporated by the tamil nadu panchayats (amendment and miscellaneous provisions) act, 1964 (amending act) which provided as under: explanation- in this section and in section 116, land revenue means public revenue due on land and includes water cess payable ..... (i) that the state legislature could not have made a law authorising the imposition of the impugned levy after the mines and minerals (regulations and development) act, 1957 (central act lxvii of 1957) came into force; (ii) that the notification in so far as it levied licence fee on the mining activities carried on by the ..... could be discussed in the first instance. in kannadasan, the appellants therein had challenged the validity of the cess and other taxes on minerals (validation) act, 1992 ( validation act for short) enacted by parliament. the high court had rejected the writ petitions. the background civil appeal nos.4056-4064 of 1999 etc. page 125 .....
Tag this Judgment!