Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sashastra seema bal act 2007 chapter iv punishments Court: central administrative tribunal cat delhi Page 1 of about 8 results (0.094 seconds)

Jun 05 2007 (TRI)

Kulbir Krishan, Ips Inspector Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)(1)SLJ294CAT

..... service, several professional awards and commendation certificates from the dib as well as appreciation from the us fbi for service of a very high order.3. the sashastra seema bal (for short "ssb") is a central police organization headed by the director general, ssb and under the administrative control of ministry of home affairs. it guards ..... to time. from the averments made in the written statement it appears that the applicant is performing his duties well. there is no mention of any specific act of indiscipline indulged by the applicant that might have resulted into his repatriation. the reason, as mentioned above, is only infighting between two officers, not connected ..... in force" clearly refer to infighting of the applicant with his counter part mr. yashwant malhotra. once again the words "it needs no emphasis that the acts of indiscipline in a central para military force cannot be allowed to go unnoticed" would take its colour from the only allegation made against the applicant, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 08 2008 (TRI)

Dr. K.K. Sharma, Assistant Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. dr. k. k. sharma, assistant surgeon (veterinary) with the 20th battalion, sashtra seema bal (ssb), ministry of home affairs, the applicant herein, while serving on the post aforesaid, successfully competed for the post of veterinary assistant surgeon in the development department of the government ..... entreaties made by the applicant, as detailed above, brought no tangible results and were not even responded to, he filed the present application under section 19 of the administrative tribunals act, 1985 seeking a writ in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to relieve him from ssb to join his new assignment.4. in response to notice issued by this .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2012 (TRI)

Surinder Singh Vs. the Secretary, Ministry of Defence (Finance), New D ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... has been defined in black's law dictionary, sixth edition at page 999, thus: 'a transgression of some established and definite rule of action, a forbidden act, a dereliction from duty, unlawful behaviour, wilful in character, improper or wrong behaviour, its synonyms are misdemeanor, misdeed, misbehavior, delinquency, impropriety, mismanagement, offense, ..... accepted. therefore it is obvious that extraneous consideration has weighed with the authorities in this regard. 9. the disciplinary authority is necessarily expected to act fairly and punishment can only be awarded in terms of the chargesheet. something which is not there, if considered, would be extraneous to the ..... and as such only deputy controller of defence accounts, who was the competent disciplinary authority being the appointing authority of the applicants authorized to act under rule 11 of the rules ibid, the punishment imposed by an authority suboridiante to the appointing authority not only vitiates statutory rules, sro .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 24 2008 (TRI)

Hc Rohtash Singh Vs. Government of Nct of Delhi Through

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... hon'ble supreme court in the same very judgment immediately following the observations relied upon by the learned counsel, read as follows: the scheme of the act reveals, the government is conferred with wide ranging power, including power to appoint all important statutory authorities; appoints director and its members of town and country ..... but, as mentioned above, the said decision cannot prejudicially affect a delinquent. there is no requirement under rule 15(2) for the additional commissioner to act judicially as well. we are conscious that even administrative orders also some times are required to be speaking containing reasons, but it is too well settled ..... officer of subordinate rank. it is under this provision, it appears, the rules of 1980 have been framed. provisions contained in section 21 of the act of 1978 vest the commissioner of police, additional commissioner of police, deputy commissioner of police, additional deputy commissioner of police, principal of the police training .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 01 2012 (TRI)

Radhey Shyam Vs. Union of India Through General Manager and Others

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

..... of pronouncements on this issue and may be summarized as follows: (i) a departmental inquiry/proceeding is distinct from a criminal trial where the evidence act or criminal procedure code is strictly applicable. the technical rules of evidence are not applicable in a departmental inquiry and the standard of proof required in a departmental ..... power and authority to reach a finding of fact or conclusion. but that finding must be based on some evidence. neither the technical rules of evidence act nor of proof of fact or evidence as defined therein, apply to disciplinary proceeding. when the authority accepts that evidence and conclusion receives support therefrom, the ..... disciplinary authority is entitled to hold that the delinquent office is guilty of the charge. the court/tribunal on its power of judicial review does not act as appellate authority to reappreciate the evidence and to arrive at the own independent findings on the evidence. the court/tribunal may interfere where the authority .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 08 2007 (TRI)

Dr. P.K. Seth Vs. the Secretary and ors.

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)(2)SLJ304CAT

..... to serve. 16. in union of india harjeet singh sandhu in the background of rule 14 of the army rules, it was held that any wrongful act or any act of delinquency which may or may not involve moral turpitude would be "misconduct" under rule 14.in baldev singh gandhi v. state of punjab , it ..... circumstances, the expression, "approval" would mean to accept as good or sufficient for the purpose of intent. ratification is noun, of the verb "ratify". it means the act of ratifying, confirmation, and sanction. the expression "ratify" means to approve and accept formally. it means to conform, by expressing consent, approval or formal sanction. "approve ..... is news based current affairs programme, which establishes no misconduct on part of the applicant.18. lastly, it is argued that the disciplinary authority has not acted independently and rather imposed punishment mechanically accepting the recommendations of cos by passing a non-reasoned order without dealing with the contentions of the applicant.19. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 02 2008 (TRI)

Bharat Singh S.i. (Exe) S/O Late Vs. Commissioner of Police, Joint

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi

1. the present case provides a classic example how lightly and by complete lack of application of mind, some times, the authorities entrusted with handling/dealing with enquiries against employees act, who may be visited with such punishments that may totally ruin their career.2. bharat singh, the applicant herein, faced a regular departmental enquiry on the following charge, which came ..... accused darshan kumar sharma as he returned back from abroad on 9/5/05 via i.g.i. airport with the fear of attachment of his immovable property. the above act on the part of you si bharat singh no. d-633 amounts to gross misconduct, negligence, carelessness and dereliction in the discharge of his office official duties which renders you .....

Tag this Judgment!

Mar 06 2013 (TRI)

Prem Singh and Others Vs. Govt. of Nct of Delhi Through Commissioner o ...

Court : Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Principal Bench New Delhi

..... the respondent and considering the charge against the respondent and disposal of the cases as compromised with admonition and benefit under section 3 of the probation of offenders act concluded the respondent to be habitual of picking up quarrels and resorting to violence and his such attitude rendering him unsuitable. it is thus not as if ..... his wife smt.rampati was also sitting with him. suddenly you along with narayan, bharal lal s.o ram nath, jella ram s/o sunder lal all resident of bal ki dhani, mundiyawas, the. thana gazi distt. alwar (raj.) having lathies in their hands came to his house and pappu ram, ramesh, narayan, bharat lal, jella ..... moral turpitude, disentitling the convict to public employment; 33. we are a little surprised at the list as it excludes offences such as promoting enmity or doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony i.e. offences punishable under section 153-a ipc. it excludes offences pertaining to mutiny and its abetment i.e. offences under sections .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //