Sane Memory - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: sane memory Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 6,466 results (0.252 seconds)Sri Asharfi Prasad Singh and ors. Vs. the State of Bihar
Court: Patna
Decided on: Sep-06-2002
lightly that the transaction was at that fresh in his memory it further says that the witnesses may also refer to
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrem Singh Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Aug-26-2002
Reported in: 2003(1)WLC3; 2003(3)WLN339
are due to normal errors of observation normal errors of memory due to lapse of time due to mental disposition such
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAvinash Eknath Nikalje Vs. Sou. Leela Avinash Nikalje
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Oct-24-2002
Reported in: AIR2003Bom244; 2003(3)MhLj450
special marriage act he deposed everything as per his own memory and the same can clearly be seen from his deposition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTPrithvey Singh Vs. State
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: 2002IIIAD(Delhi)698; 2002CriLJ2874; 96(2002)DLT785
reproduce mathematically about what he had stated earlier the human memory is bound to fumble with the passage of time and
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTangerine Informatique Ltd. and Vs. Commissioner of Customs
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-05-2002
Reported in: (2003)(162)ELT266Tri(Mum.)bai
replacing the central processing unit a higher capacity and its memory would be enhanced to support higher application he accepted that
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTLalit Chand Deka Vs. State of Rajasthan
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-22-2002
Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj1048; 2002(3)WLC408; 2003(1)WLN207
this inconsistency may be on account of natural error of memory due to lapse of time we are therefore not inclined
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState of Bihar (Now Jharkhand) Vs. Manoj Sahu @ Manoj Prasad Sahu
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: Feb-23-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2278
lakshman uraon j 1 the sole appellant manoj sahu alias manoj prasad sahu has preferred this criminal appeal against the...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRam Ratan Vs. State of U.P.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Mar-01-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2688
witness was entitled to refresh his memory and if his memory was refreshed it does not amount tutoring perusal of entire
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSuresh S. Nair Vs. State
Court: Kerala
Decided on: Nov-12-2002
Reported in: 2003CriLJ1152
an enduring impress of the identify on the mind and memory of the witness are otherwise brought out another decision referred
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSahebrao Dhondiba Patekar Vs. State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jan-18-2002
Reported in: (2002)104BOMLR118
panchnama before conducting the post mortem examination but from his memory he deposes before the court that he had seen the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial