Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka Page 6 of about 265 results (0.326 seconds)

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Sathish Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

H B Srinivasamurthy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Y M Tribhuvan Sathwik Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

B.s. Biddappa Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri A C Anantha Swamy Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri. Keshavamurthy K C Vs. The Tahasildar

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri Sudhakar Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Smt Parvathamma Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Sri H M Muninarayana Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 19 2021 (HC)

Mr Irfan Razack Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //