Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: sale of goods act 1930 chapter i preliminary Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 265 results (0.113 seconds)

Mangalore Municipal Market Welfare Society Vs. Corporation of the City ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1993KAR86; 1993(1)KarLJ84

..... in public auction, it would fetch rs. 3,000/- to rs. 5,800/-per stall and the corporation needs money to repay debts. to serve the public good, regular stalls were reconstructed in the new market building making available sufficient accommodation for the vendors as well as the customers. no complaint whatever may be made against ..... whatsoever for storing, shifting, drying or cleaning the dry fish which is absolutely necessary to carry on the business in hygienic manner and preserve the dry fish in good condition. it is stated that the opening ceremony of the new sheds in the central market was held on 15-8-1985 and till the filing of the ..... (karnataka act no. 14 of 1977) is a self-contained code and apart from the special power conferred upon the corporation under section 370, there are other provisions particularly section 369 which deals with power of municipal authorities in respect of public markets in regard to imposition and collection of fees for the sale of goods in public markets .....

Land Acquisition Officer Vs. Chandrasekhar Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1986KAR2827

..... length.we think that the submissions of learned government advocate on this aspect cannot be brushed-aside. it was for the claimant to show that these sales are bonafide sales at arm's length and do reflect the true market-value at the time they were entered into. no explanation is forthcoming why the purchasers were not ..... not be put to the potential use either immediately or in the reasonably near future. it must also be shown that the sites so laid-out would be good selling propositions. there must be evidence to show that there was corresponding demand for sites. the court-below taking all these circumstances into consideration, deducted 15% or ..... effect of putting-up the market-value, any resultant appreciation of the value should be excluded from consideration. he submitted that section 24 of the land acquisition act provides for the exclusion of any appreciation of market-value, which is the result of the acquisition itself.in the present case, the preliminary notification was dated .....

Rajasekhar Vs. Chandrakant Veerabhadrappa Desai

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1989KAR1829; 1989(2)KarLJ37

..... advocate of the petitioner who appeared before the munsiff's court and such an attestation was valid since attestation contemplated under section 14(3) of the act was only recommendatory and did not prohibit attestation by an advocate. it was also contended by the learned counsel for the petitioner that there was an ..... munsiff that is challenged before this court.2. the point for consideration is whether the impugned order of the munsiff is contrary to the provisions of the act and the rules thereunder.3. whereas the learned counsel for the petitioner sri b.v. ramamoorthy strongly contended that even though the copies of the election ..... , saundatti, in the election petition, the petitioner challenged the rejection his nomination on the ground that the returning officer had not followed the procedure prescribed under the act. the munsiff, saundatti, framed a preliminary issue on the basis of the preliminary objection raised by the respondents therein. it is not disputed that no other issues .....

The Executive Engineer (Elecl) (O and M) Division, Karnataka Electrici ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR2005KAR2183

..... the said award sought reference of their claims to the civil court for enhanced compensation by making necessary applications under section 18 of the act. the civil court on such reference placing reliance on ex.p-5 sale deed fixed the marked value of the acquired land at the rate of rs. 3,79,260/- per acre. hence, these appeals ..... contended that the civil court ought to have deducted 65% towards developmental charges. it was also contended that ex.p-5 document could never be regarded as a comparable sale document to determine the market value of 19 acres 24 guntas of land, it was contended by sri rudra gowda that the market value fixed by the land acquisition ..... 12,95,383/-. in both the above cases, the supreme court has upheld the determination of the market value based on the average of the prices reflected in the sale documents which were used as a evidence for determining the market value. we are of the considered opinion that the application of similar method/procedure in this case also .....

Sri Lakshmichand Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Suresh Gowda Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

N B Pooviah Vs. The State Of Karanataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Mvc Hanumanthaiah Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

Sri V G Siddhartha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....

B. B. Giridhar Shanbhog Vs. State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... available:83. though it has been vehemently contended that right of appeal or revision is not found in the klgp act-2011, said argument does not hold good, in the light of act 30/2020 having been enacted and section 17-a(1) as noticed herein above provides for filing an appeal against ..... . the land grabbers are forming bogus co- operative housing societies or setting up fictitious claims and indulging in 390 large scale and unprecedented and fradulent sales of land through unscrupulous real estate dealers or otherwise in favour of certain sections of people, resulting in large scale accumulation of the unaccounted wealth. as ..... it is further contended that the activities relating to land grabbing are illegally taking possession, entering into and creating tenancies, leases, licences, constructing unauthorised structures for sale or hire, giving grabbed land to any person for rent, lease, licence, for construction, use, occupation of unauthorised structures. it is contended that land grabber .....