Salaries And Allowances Of Officers Of Parliament Act 1953 Amending Act 1 Salaries And Allowances Of Officers Of Parliament Second Amendment Act 2002 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: salaries and allowances of officers of parliament act 1953 amending act 1 salaries and allowances of officers of parliament second amendment act 2002 Page 1 of about 487,141 results (0.260 seconds)Commissioner of Income-tax, New Delhi Vs. Eli Lilly and Company (India ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2009BusLR418(SC); (2009)223CTR(SC)20; [2009]312ITR225(SC); JT2009(5)SC78; 2009(4)SCALE384; [2009]178TAXMAN505(SC); 2009(4)LC1742(SC); 2009AIRSCW3104
obligation does not extend to deduction of tax out of salaries paid by any other person, which is not on account the tax-deductor- assessee to deduct tax from the Home Salary/special allowance(s) paid in foreign currency abroad.32. To resolve the controversy, we the provisions of Sub-section (1), if any such person, principal officer or company as is referred to in that Sub-section does be mandatory or compensatory or automatic because under Section 273B Parliament has enacted that penalty shall not be imposed in cases was deductible to the date on which such tax is actually paid and such interest shall be paid before furnishing the salary paid for the 'off period', the Legislature once again amended the Explanation to Section 9(1)(ii), explaining its scope to include Section 172 or Sub-section (2) of Section 174 or Section 175 or Sub-section (2) of Section 176 or deducting income-tax under In reply, the tax-deductor-assessee submitted that the four expatriates were seconded by the Foreign Company to the Joint Venture company in of the Gujarat High Court stood overruled. By the said Amendment, it was stipulated that income which falls under the head
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State of Madhya Pradesh Vs. the State of Maharashtra and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1977SC1466; 1977LabIC697; (1977)IILLJ369SC; (1977)2SCC288; [1977]2SCR555; 1977(9)LC122(SC)
1956 he would not be entitled to any payment of allowances. 32. On these facts two consequences arise in the present Maharashtra was dismissed. 6. The plaintiff was appointed Assistant Medical Officer in 1938. In 1939 he was appointed officiating Assistant Surgeon. apply. Under the residuary clause of Section 87(c) of the Act Madhya Pradesh would be liable as the principal successor State 1953 in his favour he was reinstated on 12 December, 1953. Three features are to be borne in mind in appreciating Lull's case (1) (supra) the plaintiff in that case was amended by deleting the claim for arrears of salary and also of dismissal simplicter. When the plaintiff filed a suit in 1949 he could not ask for arrears of salary. Pursuant to reinstatement on 12 December, 1953 pursuant to the decree and second on the order of suspension dated 19 January, 1954 and Lull's case (1) (supra) the plaintiff in that case was amended by deleting the claim for arrears of salary and also
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUnion of India Vs. Justice S.S. Sandhawalia (Retd.) and Others
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1994SC1377; 1994(1)BLJR307; [1994(68)FLR595]; JT1994(1)SC62; (1994)IILLJ509SC; 1994(1)SCALE69; (1994)2SCC240; [1994]1SCR83; 1994(3)SLJ181(SC); 1994(1)LC387(SC); (1994)1U
D of the Second Schedule makes provision as to the salaries and allowances payable to the Judges of the High Court. which we respectfully agree, the claim for inclusion of other allowances cannot be supported on the language of that rule.12. Rule earned leave at a time when the presence of senior officers is essential and encouraging accumulation of earned leave during service are specified in the Second Schedule to the Constitution. Accordingly, Parliament enacted the 1954 Act, Chapter II whereof comprising Sections 3 underlies the statutory scheme relating to leave formulated in the Act. It bears a logical and reasonable relationship to the essential and extraordinary leave. Section 9 as it stood before its amendment by Act 32 of 1989, provided that the monthly rate Haryana on February 24, 1972 and retired on March 18, 1980. He had earned leave to his credit which he had to his disadvantage after his appointment. Part D of the Second Schedule makes provision as to the salaries and allowances payable and extraordinary leave. Section 9 as it stood before its amendment by Act 32 of 1989, provided that the monthly rate
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTR. Kuppu Rao Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 2003(2)ALT142
Tribunal. It was also mentioned in the order that the salaries and allowances payable and the conditions of service would be be in accordance with Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and conditions of service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Member) the amount of that pension;(ii) if he had, before assuming office, received, in lieu of a portion of pension due to incorporated in the Constitution by 42nd Amendment. It enabled the Parliament to provide by law for adjudication of disputes or complaints Government also in terms of section 35 of the said Act issued notification No. 25 on 26-10-1989 known as 'The Andhra service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Member) Rules, 1989 as amended from time to time. 3. The Andhra Pradesh Administrative Tribunal conditions of service of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) Rules, 1989 as amended from time to time. As per rule-5 of made clear by the Constitution itself as per Part-D of Second Schedule of the Constitution of India. So, it is contended rule was subsequently amended in 1994 and according to the amendment the maximum pay scale was fixed at Rs. 8,000/- per
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTK.P. Mohapatra Vs. State of Orissa and ors.
Court: Orissa
Reported in: AIR2008Ori17
of the Lokpal from 16-2-1997 till 15-2-2002 and though the salaries of the Chief Justice and Judges of the High Court to pay him the salary of Rs. 26,000/- and other allowances as admissible to a sitting High Court Judges from 1-1-1996 (Orissa Act 8 of 1995) and he assumed the said office on 16-2-1997. He has been constrained to approach this Court the amendment to the High Court Judges (Conditions of Service) Act, 1954 by the Central Act 18 of 1998. The Statement the petitioner, which has been done subsequently by bringing an amendment to the Lokpal and Lokayuktas Act, 1995 is discriminatory because his tenure.4. A counter-affidavit has been filed by O. Ps. 1 to 5. In paragraph 14 of the counter it is the salaries of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas specified in the Second Schedule to the Act (Orissa Act 8 of 1995) and aforesaid objective, the amendment was made. The objective of the amendment was to keep the salaries of the Lokpal and Lokayuktas
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTZdzizlaw Skakuz Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: (1986)50CTR(AP)39; [1986]158ITR420(AP)
obligation to pay to the French concern certain amounts of salaries free of any Indian tax or surcharge, the income-tax and the amounts received by the assessee from his employer as allowances not entitled for exemption under section 10(14) of the Income-tax because the original order of assessment passed by the Income-tax Officer did not properly determine the tax perquisites received by the of the French employee falling under section 56 of the Act. We, therefore, hold that the amounts received by the assessee 154(1) of the Act provides that the Income-tax Officer may amend any order of assessment, etc., passed by him with a status of an Indian resident for the assessment years 1970-71, 1971-72, 1972 73 and 1973-74. The assessee was an employee of third parties in order to ensure payment of tax-free salary. Secondly, in the facts of this case, the payment made by incorrect and it should be grossed up. Accordingly, the officer amended the original assessment orders in the purported exercise of his
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGupta Modern Breweries Vs. State of Jammu and Kashmir and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2007(118)ECC30; 2007LC30(SC); 2007(2)JKJ29[SC]; JT2007(5)SC619; 2007(5)SCALE842; (2007)6SCC317; 2007AIRSCW2764
10.9.1981, the Excise Commissioner made a demand for payment of salaries of Excise personnel posted at appellant's distillery. Notice of demand appears that Sections and Rules provides that the salary and allowances described as establishment charges which were sought to be recovered may include provisions of accommodation by the licencee to excise officers at the licenced premises on the payment of rent or are a distinct concept that has to be voted by ParliamentThus, taxes, excise and fees must be voted by Parliament.19. In the supervision to ensure compliance with the provisions of this Act, the rules made thereunder and the licence.Similarly, Rule 15 was 5 of the said Act, as it stood before the amendment, was void.In the cases aforesaid where fees akin to Rule statutory backing.14. The case of the respondents is that Rule 17 intended that in lieu of parting with exclusive right and pay, on the refund ordered, interest at the statutory rate. Secondly, Section 24-B of the Act itself provides as under:.Any amount 5 of the said Act, as it stood before the amendment, was void.In the cases aforesaid where fees akin to Rule
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTC.V. Raghavaiah and ors. Vs. State of Andhra Pradesh, Finance Departme ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 2005(3)ALT435
pari materia with those of A.P. Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and Conditions of Services of Chairman, Vice Chairman and Members) the rules and orders for the time being applicable to officers of corresponding pay levels belonging to Indian Administrative Service.Under these provisions of the Indian Electricity Act (Amendment Act) 2000 (A.P. Act 2 of 2000). The pay and other benefits are on G.O.Ms.No. 99, General Administration Department, (SPE.B) Department, dated 24-4-2002 thereby amending Rule 12(2) of A.P. Administrative Tribunal (Salaries and Allowances and the A.P. Administrative Tribunal in Writ Petition No. 6180 of 1997 filed by Justice Upendralal Waghray. In that case also the service they are also drawing the dearness relief on the second pension and in such an event Rule 16 of the of the Special Court under the Indian Electricity (Andhra Pradesh Amendment) Act, 2000. Therefore, the Registrar of the Special Court states In taken up writ petition. No. 3281 of 2002 : 2002(3)ALD453 , where the relief of writ of Certiorari was prayed
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHansh Raj Singh Vs. Managing Director, State of Bank of Patiala and Ot ...
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: 2000(4)AWC2963; [2000(87)FLR352]; (2001)1UPLBEC159
whether the petitioner would be entitled to full pay and allowances for the whole period ofsuspension. The relevant part of Regulation sentenced for life. In view of the conviction and sentence, action was taken against him and he was dismissed from service. (2) (b) of the Reserve Bank of India (Staff) Regulation, 1948, as set out in the rejoinder-affidavit submits that in view
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRajesh Mohan Sukhla and Another Vs. Union of Indian and Another
Court: Allahabad
Reported in: 2000(1)AWC548; (2000)1UPLBEC493
opinion this cannot make any difference in respect of their salaries and allowances since both the categories do the same work cannot make any difference in respect of their salaries and allowances since both the categories do the same work and functions.3. others v. State of Haryana and others, AIR 1988 SC 1504 and Bhagwan Das and others v. State of Haryana, AIR
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>