S 497 - Judgment Search Results

V. Revathi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC835; 1988CriLJ921a; JT1988(1)SC419; (1988)93PLR649; 1988(1)SCALE420; (1988)2SCC72; [1988]3SCR73

..... in the context of a challenge to the constitutionality of section 497 s 497 whoever has sexual intercourse with a person who is and ..... her offending husband for the offence of adultery punishable under section 497 of the indian penal code is to violate the constitution by ..... who had been prosecuted for the offence of adultery under section 497 of the indian penal code by the husband of the adultress .....

Cruzan Vs. Director, Mdh

Court: US Supreme Court

..... prohibition must meet these standards if it significantly burdens a fundamental liberty interest fundamental page 497 u s 304 rights are protected not only against heavy handed frontal attack but ..... the cessation of treatment of patients in persistent vegetative states footnote 4 21 considered page 497 u s 349 against the background of other cases involving patients in persistent vegetative states .....

Hodgson Vs. Minnesota

Court: US Supreme Court

..... law which are constitutional from those which are not pp 497 u s 497 501 stevens j announced the judgment of the court and ..... as she sees it section 144 343 without the page 497 u s 497 judicial bypass provision of subdivision 6 is constitutional i would ..... actually occur good faith compliance with the statute s requirements page 497 u s 491 would tend to facilitate communication between daughters and .....

Kali Dass Vs. S.H.O. Police Station Reasi

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Reported in: 1979CriLJ345

..... is that the restrictions and limitations contained in sections 496 and 497 cr p c also govern the exercise of discretion by the ..... the view that the expression appear occurring in sections 496 and 497 cr p c includes voluntary appearance as when a person accused ..... anticipation of his arrest after satisfying the requirements contained in section 497 cr p c and the court is further satisfied that there .....

Metro Broadcasting Vs. Fcc

Court: US Supreme Court

..... commitment to offer whatever programming the fcc believes would reflect underrepresented viewpoints post at 497 u s 623 similarly ignores the practical difficulties in determining the underrepresented viewpoints ..... minority participation in the broadcasting industry falls markedly below the demographic representation page 497 u s 611 of those groups see e g congressional research service minority .....

Ohio Vs. Akron Center

Court: US Supreme Court

..... following it by imposing three additional requirements on bypass page 497 u s 515 procedures first they challenge the constructive ..... that alone and not lawyerly dissection of federal judicial page 497 u s 521 precedents can produce compromises satisfying a sufficient ..... evidentiary proceeding footnote 3 the district court observed the page 497 u s 536 judge s decision will necessarily be based .....

Amir Chand and anr. Vs. the Crown

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1950P& H53; 1950CriLJ480

..... that there can bu no bail unless the conditions contemplated by s 497 criminal p c are fulfilled the matter again arose in emperor ..... a magistrate these two portions are clearly ancillary to sections 496 and 497 criminal p c the controversy arises in regard to the middle ..... mr these two portions are clearly ancillary to sections 496 and 497 criminal p recognizance of the person to be admitted to bail .....

Saibal Kumar Gupta and ors. Vs. B.K. Sen and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1961SC633; 1961CriLJ749; [1961]3SCR460

..... divisional magistrate alipore against the respondent b k sen under s 497 of the indian penal code the magistrate after examining numerous witnesses ..... sen had suborned the prosecution witnesses in the case under s 497 indian penal code against him or had prevented witnesses for the ..... high court and the magistrate before whom the proceedings under s 497 were pending at the time the high court passed its .....

Washington Vs. Glucksberg

Court: US Supreme Court

..... justice harlan s dissenting opinion in poe v ullman 367 u s 497 1961 would largely abandon this restrained methodology and instead ask whether ..... persons a constitutionally protected right to refuse lifesaving hydration and nutrition cruzan 497 u s at 279 id at 287 o connor j concurring ..... constitutional claims see e g bolling v sharpe 347 u s 497 1954 now it is enough to say that our examination of .....

Planned Parenthood of Southeastern PA. Vs. Casey

Court: US Supreme Court

..... bulwarks also against arbitrary legislation poe v ullman 367 u s 497 541 1961 harlan j dissenting from dismissal on jurisdictional grounds ..... from shared premises some disagreement is inevitable compare hodgson 497 u s at 482 497 kennedy j concurring in judgment in part and ..... in webster v reproductive health services supra and hodgson v minnesota 497 u s 417 1990 the court of appeals concluded that .....