S 362 - Judgment Search Results

Surinder Singh Vs. the State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1981CriLJ1778; 20(1981)DLT372

..... the said judgment of the supreme court that in view of section 362 of the code of criminal procedure high court has no jurisdiction ..... the said judgment of the supreme court that in view of section 362 of the code of criminal procedure high court has no jurisdiction ..... review petition is barred by section 362 of the code of criminal procedure which reads as under s 362 save as otherwise provided by this .....

Habu Vs. State of Rajasthan

Court: Rajasthan

Reported in: AIR1987Raj83; 1987(1)WLN272

..... of the provisions of the code of criminal procedure particularly section 362 cr p c which is basically against the rights of ..... which otherwise has been restricted by the negative provisions of section 362 cr p c he submitted that the inherent power regarding ..... what the code specifically prohibits the court from doing when section 362 expressly prohibits the court from altering or reviewing its final .....

Telegraphers Vs. Chicago and N.W. R. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... governed by the specific provisions of a federal statute page 362 u s 362 and that s uch provisions cannot be rendered nugatory by ..... stations and abolishing 53 full time agency positions effective immediately page 362 u s 349 on december 23 1957 about six weeks after ..... under the railway labor act inasmuch as no adequate administrative page 362 u s 363 remedy can be afforded by the national railroad .....

Ranbir Singh Dhanjal Vs. the State and Another

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 2001IVAD(Delhi)488; 91(2001)DLT515; I(2001)DMC779; 2001(59)DRJ1

..... the code it is true that the prohibition in section 362 against the court altering or reviewing its judgment is subject ..... is not contemplated by the saving provision contained in section 362 7 the reliance was also placed on mosst simrikhia vs ..... to be dismissed and i order accordingly criminal procedure code 1973 section 362 alteration or review of judgment maintainability save as otherwise provided .....

Machinists Local Vs. Labor Board

Court: US Supreme Court

..... against the petitioners were sustained by the national labor relations page 362 u s 412 board were barred by the six month ..... status unless brought within six months of their execution far page 362 u s 426 from providing such a showing the legislative history ..... limitation specifically applicable to agreements with minority unions footnote 18 page 362 u s 428 in sustaining the board s position the court .....

Levine Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of criminal contempt and sentenced did not invalidate his conviction pp 362 u s 611 620 a a proceeding for criminal contempt under ..... by the foreman of the grand jury and advised by page 362 u s 612 government counsel that applicable statutes gave him complete ..... to further participation by the court in the process of page 362 u s 613 compelling his testimony except according to the procedures .....

illinois Vs. Gates

Court: US Supreme Court

..... substantial basis for crediting the hearsay jones v united states 362 u s at 362 u s 269 362 u s 271 finally the anonymous letter contained a ..... cause page 462 u s 239 existed jones v united states 362 u s at 362 u s 271 we are convinced that this flexible easily applied ..... our prior decisions on the subject in jones v united states 362 u s 257 362 u s 271 1960 we held that probable cause to search .....

Krishna Nayar Ram Nayar Vs. State

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: (1959)61BOMLR684; 1960CriLJ324

..... followed by presidency magistrates in regard to the recording of evidence is mentioned in s 362 of the cri p c acfording to that section no evidence need be recorded where ..... learned presidency magistrate was acting on the assumption that the procedure laid down in section 362 cri p c is to be followed even in cases under the bombay prohibition act .....

The Australian Electoral Commission and Others Vs. David Johnston and ...

Court: Australia High Court

..... reached rather than the result which was declared as already explained s 362 3 requires that no order be made declaring a person who ..... the use of these different expressions in the two provisions section 362 3 provides the relevant limitation on the court s exercise of ..... of the evidence was sought to be supported by reference to s 362 3 its admission in this case is unnecessary 110 though variously .....

Marine Cooks and Stewards Vs. Panama S.S. Co.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... of railroad telegraphers v chicago north western r co ante p 362 u s 362 dissents footnote 1 47 stat 70 29 u s c 101 ..... district court against the petitioner union and its members praying for page 362 u s 366 temporary and permanent injunctions to restrain and for ..... to any person or any property the district court issued a page 362 u s 367 temporary injunction to restrain the picketing footnote 3 .....