Skip to content

Did you mean: set off?


S 10 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: s 10 Page 1 of about 604 results (1.733 seconds)
Feb 10 2009 (HC)

M. Raja Appar and Ors. Vs. M. Gnanasambandam (deceased by L.R's.)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2009Mad159; (2009)5MLJ210

..... the applicant defendant is seeking a decree for partition of his 3 10 share in the suit property therefore the respondents plaintiffs can always ..... that suit applicant is seeking a decree for partition of his 3 10 share in suit property therefore respondents can file mou in said ..... that applicant is entitled only to 1 4 share and not 3 10 share thus only result possible in present suit can be achieved .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 17 2014 (HC)

Claudio S.X. Pereira and Another Vs. Mohan Vasudev Salkar (deceased th ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

..... decree by taking further steps parties to appear before the trial court on 07 10 2014 at 10 00 a m rule is made absolute accordingly 12 the petition stands disposed of ..... were otherwise duty bound to maintain the existing tarred road access to the decree holders 10 in view of the above the impugned order cannot sustain and the same is required .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 1990 (HC)

Premananda S.X. Verencar and ors. Vs. Vilas Nakul Bale and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(1)BomCR244

sharad manohar j 1 the point raised in this revision application stems from the desire to indulge in technicalities 2...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 03 2007 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Financ ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(4)KarLJ210; 2007(4)KCCR2159; 2007(3)AIRKarR26(DB)

..... station are invariably done especially if their children are less than 10 years of age according to the first petitioner such contingency did ..... station are invariably done especially if their children are less than 10 years of age the first petitioner has further taken the view ..... that the above mentioned guidelines referring to children of less than 10 years of age did not apply to the case of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 02 1994 (TRI)

Vulcan Lavel Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1994)(74)ELT764Tri(Mum.)bai

1 this is an appeal directed against the order in original no s 10 87 85g dated 19 7 1985 passed by the addl collector of customs bombay ordering .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 02 1995 (TRI)

Rallis India Ltd. Vs. Collector of Customs

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1995)(78)ELT86Tri(Mum.)bai

1 this is an appeal against the order in original no s 10 134 87 11 dated 7 9 1987 of the collector of customs bombay ordering confiscation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 1996 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Shri Janak Vyas

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1996)(88)ELT398Tri(Mum.)bai

..... no 124 96bch dated 15 2 1996 setting aside the order in original no s 10 45 pk 94siib dated 7 7 1995 3 the facts in brief are that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

May 16 1997 (TRI)

N. C. Patodia Vs. Income Tax Officer.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Jaipur

Reported in: (1997)59TTJ(JP.)179

..... the lic to notify incentive bonus under sub cl i of cl 14 of s 10 it has however directed that a portion of the allowance certified as having been actually .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 20 2014 (HC)

Charanjit Lal Vs. Jatinder Kumar

Court: Punjab and Haryana

..... half share the petitioner defendant had made an application before the trial court under s 10 cpc for stay of suit for the reason that the previous suit was pending the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 05 1965 (HC)

State of Gujarat Vs. Laljibhai Chaturbhai

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: AIR1967Guj61; 1967CriLJ376; (1966)GLR120

..... therefore leave it out of account but the food inspector has got powers under s 10 of the prevention of food adulteration act to take sample mere refusal therefore would not .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //