S 10 - Judgment Search Results

Claudio S.X. Pereira and Another Vs. Mohan Vasudev Salkar (deceased th ...

Court: Mumbai Goa

4) The parties shall bear their respective costs in the suit. 5) The parties hereto, therefore, prays that the suit be maintain the existing tarred road access to the decree holders. 10. In view of the above, the impugned order cannot sustain

Premananda S.X. Verencar and ors. Vs. Vilas Nakul Bale and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1991(1)BomCR244

the deceased defendant No. 1 in the counter-claim, and the suit and the counter-claim were ordered to proceed for trail.The present

Union of India (Uoi), Represented by Its Secretary, Ministry of Financ ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: 2007(4)KarLJ210; 2007(4)KCCR2159; 2007(3)AIRKarR26(DB)

Annexure-'B' order could not stand in the way of taking such a decision by he first petitioner. As we have already by the Central Administrative Tribunal, Bangalore Bench, in O.A. No. 108/2006 and also Annexure-'B' order dated 1.2.2006 passed by the Central

M. Raja Appar and Ors. Vs. M. Gnanasambandam (deceased by L.R's.)

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2009Mad159; (2009)5MLJ210

then there cannot be a decree for specific performance. The stage upto which this Court can go in the present suit, house, ground and premises bearing old No. 16, New No. 10, Singaram Street, T. Nagar, Chennai-17 shall be shared as follows:i)