Skip to content


S 1 - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: s 1 Page 1 of about 631 results (0.085 seconds)
Nov 21 2013 (SC)

E.S.i.C Medical Officer's Association Vs. E.S.i.C and Anr

Court: Supreme Court of India

ethics and members are almost universally required to swear to some form of oath to uphold those ethics, therefore professing to expression contained in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ID Act).3. Petitioner is an Association of medical

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 12 2004 (SC)

S.i. Paras Kumar and ors. Vs. S.i. Ram Charan and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 2004(4)ALD107(SC); [2004(101)FLR1016]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC510; 2004(4)SCALE503; (2004)6SCC88; 2004(3)SLJ234(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC1980

1997 - this was disposed along with CWP No. 403/97].Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana Six Petitioners. They got Police is permissible under format of the Punjab police Rules, 1934?9. Punjab Police Rules were framed under Section 2 of the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 11 2010 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise, Belapur M/S I.G. Petro Chemicals Ltd. ...

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

the assessee by this Tribunal’s decision upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed in this case is whether the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-CE (Entry No. 7) dated 4.1.1995 was admissible to the assessee

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 22 2008 (HC)

Regional Director, E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Bapuji Press Rep. by Its Man ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: [2008(118)FLR200]; (2008)IILLJ271Mad

Press and Bapuji Printers functioned as independent legal entities with separate licence, accounts, etc. On the expiry of the said Aramudham, liable to pay any contribution for the period prior to 1.1.84 and the contribution already paid by the petitioner for the

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 12 1999 (HC)

Moderator, Church of South India, C.S.i. Centre and ors. Vs. J.S. King ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)2MLJ277

pending, such persons should not be allowed to prosecute the same. The action is not bona fide.21. In Ranipet Municipality Commissioner Bagghi, 18 C.W.N. 119 makes the following observations at pp. 120-21:The order now before us was not made and cannot be

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 03 2002 (HC)

The Philipspuram Pastorate Church, C.S.i., Rep. by Rev. V. Oliver, Vs. ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (2002)2MLJ167

the Home Church has got title and possession of the suit properties is set aside. The suit property had vested with referred to as the London Mission Kasba Sabai supra. In 1947, all the churches and properties belonging to London Mission Society

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 13 2013 (HC)

Sobhana Vs. S.i. of Police

Court: Kerala

SRAVANA, 1935 WP(Crl.).No. 365 of 2013 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SOBHANA AGED 4 YEARS W/O.SREENIVASAN, VALIYAKULANGARA HOUSE, KULAPPULLI GOVT.PRESS P O, JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY,THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 22ND SRAVANA, 1935 WP(Crl.).No. 365 of 2013 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SOBHANA AGED

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 23 2001 (TRI)

M/S. I.O.C. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Vadodara

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

prior to 28.9.96 was Rs.13,90,86,359. Invoking the provisions contained in Section 11AC same amount of penalty was imposed as penalty. Since same amount of penalty was imposed as penalty. Since Section 11AC of the Act has no retrospective operation, Department was not

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 25 1999 (TRI)

S.i.P. Industries Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Reported in: (2000)(88)LC396Tri(Delhi)

applicants as prayed for.6. We find that all the reasons stated in the present application and reiterated by the learned Counsel the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises Act, 1944. In Para 4 of the earlier Stay order, the Tribunal

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 08 2001 (TRI)

M/S. I.S. Vyeing and Printing Mills Vs. Cce, Chandigarh-11

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

1. Shri K.K.Anand, Advocate prays for withdrawal of the stay application for staying the operation of the impugned order. No 1. Shri K.K.Anand, Advocate prays for withdrawal of the stay application

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //