S 1 - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: s 1 Page 1 of about 631 results (0.085 seconds)E.S.i.C Medical Officer's Association Vs. E.S.i.C and Anr
Court: Supreme Court of India
ethics and members are almost universally required to swear to some form of oath to uphold those ethics, therefore professing to expression contained in Section 2(s) of the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short ID Act).3. Petitioner is an Association of medical
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.i. Paras Kumar and ors. Vs. S.i. Ram Charan and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 2004(4)ALD107(SC); [2004(101)FLR1016]; JT2004(Suppl1)SC510; 2004(4)SCALE503; (2004)6SCC88; 2004(3)SLJ234(SC); (2004)2UPLBEC1980
1997 - this was disposed along with CWP No. 403/97].Kuldeep Singh and Ors. v. State of Haryana Six Petitioners. They got Police is permissible under format of the Punjab police Rules, 1934?9. Punjab Police Rules were framed under Section 2 of the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Central Excise, Belapur M/S I.G. Petro Chemicals Ltd. ...
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai
the assessee by this Tribunal’s decision upheld by the Hon’ble Supreme Court. Consequently, the appeals filed by the Revenue are dismissed in this case is whether the benefit of Notification No. 1/95-CE (Entry No. 7) dated 4.1.1995 was admissible to the assessee
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRegional Director, E.S.i. Corporation Vs. Bapuji Press Rep. by Its Man ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: [2008(118)FLR200]; (2008)IILLJ271Mad
Press and Bapuji Printers functioned as independent legal entities with separate licence, accounts, etc. On the expiry of the said Aramudham, liable to pay any contribution for the period prior to 1.1.84 and the contribution already paid by the petitioner for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTModerator, Church of South India, C.S.i. Centre and ors. Vs. J.S. King ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (1999)2MLJ277
pending, such persons should not be allowed to prosecute the same. The action is not bona fide.21. In Ranipet Municipality Commissioner Bagghi, 18 C.W.N. 119 makes the following observations at pp. 120-21:The order now before us was not made and cannot be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Philipspuram Pastorate Church, C.S.i., Rep. by Rev. V. Oliver, Vs. ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: (2002)2MLJ167
the Home Church has got title and possession of the suit properties is set aside. The suit property had vested with referred to as the London Mission Kasba Sabai supra. In 1947, all the churches and properties belonging to London Mission Society
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSobhana Vs. S.i. of Police
Court: Kerala
SRAVANA, 1935 WP(Crl.).No. 365 of 2013 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SOBHANA AGED 4 YEARS W/O.SREENIVASAN, VALIYAKULANGARA HOUSE, KULAPPULLI GOVT.PRESS P O, JUSTICE P.D.RAJAN TUESDAY,THE 13TH DAY OF AUGUST 2013 22ND SRAVANA, 1935 WP(Crl.).No. 365 of 2013 (S) ----------------------------- PETITIONER: -------------------- SOBHANA AGED
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. I.O.C. Ltd. Vs. Cce, Vadodara
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
prior to 28.9.96 was Rs.13,90,86,359. Invoking the provisions contained in Section 11AC same amount of penalty was imposed as penalty. Since same amount of penalty was imposed as penalty. Since Section 11AC of the Act has no retrospective operation, Department was not
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTS.i.P. Industries Vs. Cce
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Reported in: (2000)(88)LC396Tri(Delhi)
applicants as prayed for.6. We find that all the reasons stated in the present application and reiterated by the learned Counsel the proviso to Section 35F of the Central Excises Act, 1944. In Para 4 of the earlier Stay order, the Tribunal
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTM/S. I.S. Vyeing and Printing Mills Vs. Cce, Chandigarh-11
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
1. Shri K.K.Anand, Advocate prays for withdrawal of the stay application for staying the operation of the impugned order. No 1. Shri K.K.Anand, Advocate prays for withdrawal of the stay application
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>