Court : Supreme Court of India
[REPORTABLE]. IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.1346 OF2010MILKHI RAM APPELLANT(S) VERSUS HIMACHAL PRADESH STATE ELECTRICITY BOARD RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT Hrishikesh Roy, J.1. Heard Mr. Ajit Singh Pundir, learned counsel appearing for the appellant (plaintiff). Also heard Mr. Naresh K. Sharma, learned counsel appearing for the respondent (defendant).2. The challenge here is to the judgment dated 6.11.2008 of the High Court of Himachal Pradesh whereunder the Page 1 of 11 defendants Civil Revision No.16/2006 was allowed with the observation that the civil court lacked jurisdiction to entertain the civil suit based on the Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 (for short the ID ACT) and therefore, the judgment and decree in favour of the plaintiff are a nullity. The Court also opined that a plea on absence of jurisdiction can be raised even at the stage of execution of proceedings.3. The appellant was a daily wage employee under the Himachal Pradesh State El...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6732 OF2021National Highway Authority of India Appellant Versus Transstroy (India) Limited Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned judgment and order passed by the High Court of Delhi in OMP No.459 of 2017 by which the High Court has dismissed the said petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 (hereinafter referred to as the Arbitration Act, 1996) in which the appellant National Highway Authority of India (hereinafter referred to as NHAI) prayed to set aside the Arbitral Award dated 15.09.2017 and also the order passed by the Arbitral Tribunal not entertaining and/or considering the counter claim 1 filed by the NHAI, the original petitioner NHAI has preferred the present appeal.2. The facts leading to the present appeal and the case on behalf of the appellant NHAI are as under:- 2.1 That the NHAI and the respondent ente...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.OF2022(Arising out of Special Leave Petition (C) No.16161 of 2018) Hariharan & Ors. Appellants v. Harsh Vardhan Singh Rao & Ors. ... Respondents with Civil Appeal No.of 2022 [Arising out of S.L.P. (C) No.________ of 2022]. [Diary No.12422 of 2022]. JUDGMENT ABHAY S. OKA, J.1. Leave granted in Special Leave Petition (C) No.16161 of 2018. Delay in filing Special Leave Petition (C) Diary No.12422 of 2022 is condoned and leave is granted in the said Special Leave Petition as well.2. In Civil Appeal arising out of SLP (C) No.16161 of 2018, the appellants who are original respondents nos.11 to 14 before the High Court of Gujarat, have challenged the judgment and order 1 dated 11th May 2018 passed by a Division Bench of the High Court of Gujarat on a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India filed by respondents nos.1 to 18. FACTUAL ASPECTS IN CIVIL APPEAL ARISING OUT OF S.L.P.(C) NO.1616...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE2023INSC621IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CRIMINAL APPELLATE JURISDICTION Criminal Appeal No.1931 of 2023 (Arising out of SLP (Crl.) No.8211 of 2022) Mathew Alexander Appellant(s) Vs. Mohammed Shafi and Anr. Respondent(s) JUDGMENT NAGARATHNA J.Leave granted.2. The Appellant herein is aggrieved by the quashing of the opinion formed as per final report in pursuant to the further investigation in Crime No.1/2015 registered at Chathannoor Police Station, by the High Court in its order dated 31.03.2022.3. Briefly stated the facts are that an FIR bearing No.01/2015 was registered by the complainant against the Appellants son before the Chathannoor Police Station invoking Sections 279 and 304A of the IPC. The FIR stated that on 01.01.2015, at around 2.15 am, Appellants son, Nixon Abey Matthew, aged 20 years, was driving a Maruti Alto car bearing No.KL2AC1370through the Kollam-Thiruvananthapuram National Highway from East to West direction on the left side of the 2 road, along with ...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.7295 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.8343 OF2019 STATE OF ODISHA & ANOTHER PETITIONER(S) VERSUS ANUP KUMAR SENAPATI & ANOTHER RESPONDENT(S) WITH CIVIL APPEAL No.7298 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.29313 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL NO7301OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.32409 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.7296 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.16964 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.7297 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.17416 OF2018 (ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) No.22309 OF2019ARISING OUT OF CIVIL APPEAL No.7304 OF2019DIARY NO.31807 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL NOS. 72997300 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NOS.3111031111 OF2018 CIVIL APPEAL No.7302 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.4261 OF2019 AND2CIVIL APPEAL No.7303 OF2019(ARISING OUT OF S.L.P. (C) NO.6708 OF2019 ARUN MISHRA, J.JUDGMENT1 The question involved in the appeals is whether the employees are entitled to claim grantinaid as admissible under the Orissa (Non...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3093 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.23478 OF2019 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. SOMWATI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3094 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.4801 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. SANGITA AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3095 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.4643 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT AZMATI KHATOON AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3096 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.5441 OF2020 CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED ...APPELLANT VERSUS UMARANI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH2CIVIL APPEAL NO.3097 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.6381 OF2020 THE NEW INDIA ASSURANCE COMPANY LIMITED VERSUS ...APPELLANT SMT. PINKI AND OTHERS ...RESPONDENTS WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3098 OF2020(ARISING OUT OF SLP(C) No.7556 OF2020 THE NEW IND...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 Civil Appeal No.3707 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.6841 of 2020) Ram Sharan Maurya and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. and others REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE/ORIGINAL/INHERENT JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.3707 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil) No.6841 of 2020) Ram Sharan Maurya and others Appellants Versus State of U.P. and others Respondents WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3708 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil) No.6847 of 2020) WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3709 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil) No.7817 of 2020) WITH CONTEMPT PETITION (C) No.418 OF2020IN SPECIAL LEAVE PETITION(CIVIL) NO.6841 OF2020 2 Civil Appeal No.3707 of 2020 (Arising out of SLP(C)No.6841 of 2020) Ram Sharan Maurya and Ors. Vs. State of U.P. and others WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3710 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil) No.13741 of 2020) Diary No.12189 of 2020 WITH CIVIL APPEAL NO.3711 OF2020(Arising out of Special Leave Petition(Civil) No.13742 of...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL NO.5848 OF2021(ARISING OUT OF SLP (CIVIL) No.24095 OF2019 UNION OF INDIA & ORS. .....APPELLANT(S) VERSUS DALBIR SINGH .....RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT HEMANT GUPTA, J.1. Leave granted.2. The order dated 11.4.2019 passed by the Division Bench of the High Court of Delhi at New Delhi is the subject matter of challenge in the present appeal whereby the order of dismissal passed by the Competent Authority on 24.5.2014, appellate order dated 9.10.2014, and revisional order dated 13.2.2015 were set aside. The respondent1 was hence directed to be reinstated and also was found entitled to arrears of pay from the date of dismissal of service till the date he actually joins the duty.3. The writ petitioner was a General Duty Constable in the Central Reserve Police Force (CRPF). An FIR No.16/1993 was lodged 1 Hereinafter referred to as the writ petitioner 1 against the writ petitioner for an offence under Section 302, 307...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6451 OF2021(Arising out of S.L.P. (C.) No.14558 of 2019) N. JAYASREE & ORS. APPELLANT(S) VERSUS CHOLAMANDALAM MS GENERAL INSURANCE COMPANY LTD. RESPONDENT(S) JUDGMENT S. ABDUL NAZEER, J.Leave granted.2. This appeal is directed against the judgment dated 09.08.2017 passed by the High Court of Kerala at Ernakulam in MACA No.1560 of 2013. Through the impugned judgment, the High Court scaled down the amount of compensation payable to the present appellants and thereby modified the award dated 1 26.04.2013 passed by the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal, Kottayam (for short MACT) in OP(MV) No.843 of 2011.3. The appellants filed the aforesaid claim petition before the MACT seeking compensation on account of the death of N. Venugopalan Nair in a motor vehicle accident which occurred on 20.06.2011. Appellant no.1 is the wife of the deceased, appellant nos. 2 and 3 are his daughters and appellant no.4 is his moth...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Supreme Court of India
1 REPORTABLE IN THE SUPREME COURT OF INDIA CIVIL APPELLATE JURISDICTION CIVIL APPEAL No.6450 OF2012Tata Motors Limited Appellant Versus Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority & Others Respondents JUDGMENT M.R. SHAH, J.1. Feeling aggrieved and dissatisfied with the impugned order dated 29.06.2009 passed by the Central Sales Tax Appellate Authority, New Delhi (hereinafter referred to as the Appellate Authority) in Appeal No.330/CST/2008, by which, though the transaction/sales of buses effected through RSO, Vijayawada sold to Andhra Pradesh State Road Transport Corporation (for short, APSRTC) were found to be in the nature of inter-state, no further consequential order has been passed by the Appellate Authority directing to adjust the amount of tax paid on the aforesaid transaction against the tax to be paid to the State of Jharkhand, the original appellant Tata Motors Limited has preferred the present appeal.2. We have heard Shri Amar Dave, learned counsel appearing on behalf of the appe...
Tag this Judgment!