Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: road transport corporations act 1950 section 31 power to the corporation to spend Page 14 of about 722 results (0.104 seconds)

Sep 29 2003 (HC)

U.P. State Road Transport Corporation Vs. the State of Uttar Pradesh a ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : (2003)3UPLBEC2806

..... framed regulations laying down terms and conditions of service for its employees under section 45(2)(c) of the road transport corporation act, 1950 known as the u.p. state road transport corporation (employees other than officers) services regulations, 1981 on 19.6.1981 and regulation 64 clearly provides that the appointing authority can himself inquire into the charges. 10. the labour court ..... the record. 2. heard sri samir sharma, learned counsel for the petitioner, and the standing counsel. 3. the brief facts of the case arc that the up. state road transport corporation was constituted with effect from 1.6.1972 under section 3 of the road transport corporation act, 1950 and it succeeded in toto the assets and liabilities of the erstwhile u.p. government roadways. since the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jul 10 2008 (HC)

Vijay Baburao Thakar and ors. Vs. State of Maharashtra and ors.

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2008(6)MhLj344

..... the petitioners and respective counsels of the respondents at length. the grievance of the petitioners in a nutshell is that:(i) two separate road undertakings could have been merged only under the road transport corporation act and not under the indian companies act;(ii) in the earlier government resolution which was issued by the government dated 2nd january, 2006, the government had taken a decision to ..... resolutions which were passed in the year 2005-2006, a recommendation was made that the two transport undertakings should be merged under the road transport corporation act and, therefore, the government had erred in issuing the impugned government resolution dated 19th april, 2007 recommending merger under the indian companies act. there is no substance in the said submission made by the learned counsel appearing on behalf .....

Tag this Judgment!

May 04 1968 (HC)

Raipur Transport Co. Pvt. Ltd., Raipur and anr. Vs. the State of Madhy ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1969MP150; 1968MPLJ854

..... of the gazette propounding the aforestated schemes for the running and operation by the corporation of road transport services on the routes specified ..... d (3) of the motor vehicles act, 1939, (hereinafter called the act), has been challenged. in exercise of the powers conferred by section 68-c of the act, the madhya pra-desh state road transport corporation (hereinafter referred to as the corporation), constituted under the road transport corporations act, 1950, published proposals in various issues ..... 1966. in those cases also, learned counsel sought to argue that there was non-compliance of section 20 of the road transport corporations act, 1950. the point has not been specifically taken in the petitions and cannot, therefore, be considered.60. in misc. petition no. .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 24 1959 (HC)

Parbhani Transport Co-operative Society Limited Vs. G.V. Bedekar and o ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1959)61BOMLR1572

..... on the objects which are set out in s. 3 of the road transport corporations act, 1950. these objects are identical with the matters regarding which an opinion is ..... hedge however argued that so far as road transport corporation of the state is concerned, it must always form an opinion of the kind which is referred to in s. 68c because of the objects set out in s. 3 of the road transport corporations act.according to him a state road transport corporation can be constituted only for carrying ..... the government, and its function was to co ordinate all transport services in the state. such a corporation was set up in the year 1949. but this court held that the corporation was not validly constituted. that was in october the enactment of the road transport corporations act, 1950, which received the assent of the president on .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 16 1973 (HC)

Sitaram and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and ors.

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1973(6)WLN917

..... overlapping the nationalised routes. from 1st october, 1964, the rajasthan state government constituted the rajasthan state road transport corporation hereinafter referred to aa corporation, under section 3 of the road transport corporation act, 1950, hereinafter to be referred as the 'corporation act'. by identical notifications dated 22-9-69 the general manager of the corporation published schemes of notionahsati in for the routes that partially overlapped the aforesaid 3 nationalised routes ..... a uniform basis. section 68a is the definition section. the term 'state transport undertaking' means any undertaking providing road transport service where such undertaking is carried on by (1) the central government or a state government; (2) any road transport corporation established under section 3 of the road transport corporation act, 1950; (3) ... (4) any municipality or any corporation or company owned or controlled by the central government or one or .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 06 1972 (SC)

The Management of D.T.U. Vs. Shri B.B.L. Hajelay and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [1973(27)FLR10]; (1973)ILLJ76SC; (1972)2SCC744; [1973]2SCR114; 1973(1)SLJ19(SC); 1973(5)LC386(SC)

..... driver in the delhi road transport authority which had been constituted under the delhi road transport authority act, 1950. the delhi municipal corporation act, 1957 came into force in january, 1958by section 516(1)(a) of the corporation act, the delhi roadtransport authority act, 1_50, stood repealed and in virtue ofseveral other sections of the corporation act the functions of the delhi road transport authority were taken over by the corporation. under section 511 every ..... of the, appellant undertaking, contended that respondent no. 2 had been actually appointed by the manager of the delhi road transport authority constituted under the delhi road transport authority act, 1950 and on the repeal of that act and the take over of the authority by the corporation, any officer of the appellant undertaking, competent to appoint or remove a driver, was entitled to remove him from .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 16 1972 (HC)

Rameshwarlal and ors. Vs. Rajasthan State Road Transport Corporation a ...

Court : Rajasthan

Reported in : 1972WLN553

..... air 1966 s.c. 1064 would seem to support the respondent. there, the order of termination of the appellant's service by the corporation a body set up under the road transport corporations act, 1960, was held to be bad in law on account of its being in contravention of clause (4)(b) of the regulations ..... which the public was interested. moreover, as the funds out of which they were paid belonged to the corporations as provided in section 27 of the road transport corporation act, 1950 and section 24 of the life insurance corporation act, 1956, the petitioners were not paid out of any public fund. the petitioners did not hold any public ..... the learned counsel for petitioner rameshwarlal has been able to argue in this connection is that even though the corporation passed a resolution, in the exercise of its powers under section 45(c) of the road transport corporation act. 1950, that the rajasthan civil services (classification, control and appeal) rules should apply to its employees until .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 20 1997 (HC)

Samyuktha Karnataka Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : [1998]110STC226(Kar)

..... , in another case, namely, calcutta state transport corporation v. commissioner of income-tax : [1996]219itr515(sc) , it has been held that the corporation constituted under the road transport corporation act, 1960 is not a 'local authority'. in para 7, it has been held that : 'the assessee is a road transport corporation constituted to render road transport services in the state. sections 18 and 19 of the road transport corporation act which set out the general duty ..... and powers of the corporation establish clearly that the corporation is meant mainly and only for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical and properly coordinated .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1972 (SC)

S. Abdul Khader Saheb Vs. the Mysore Revenue Appellate Tribunal, Banga ...

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1973SC534; (1973)1SCC357; [1973]2SCR925; 1973(5)LC456(SC)

..... . it has further been stated that in the present case no permit has so far been issued to the state corporation because it has failed to comply with certain provisions and in particular with the requirement of section 20 of the road transport corporations act 1950. it may be that the facts are somewhat different here. the view which the high court in the present ..... case took was that after the bellary scheme had come into force the operators other than the state transport undertaking were totally excluded. in thippeswamy's case (supra) also it .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 20 1992 (HC)

Girdharlal Lorinchand Puri Vs. Maharashtra State Road Transport Corpn. ...

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 1992(3)BomCR547; (1994)ILLJ770Bom

..... of passing this order, under the provisions of regulation 81 of the bombay state road transport employees service regulations.'these regulations shall hereinafter be referred to as 'srs' and have been framed under section 45 of the road transport corporation act, 1950.3. in the present suit instituted on september 28, 1976 plaintiff ..... seeks a decree for rs. 95,000/-. he contends that the order of termination cannot deprive him of the retirement benefits. these benefits include gratuity and bonus. certain sums have been wrongfully withheld by the corporation ..... , certain provisions have been formulated and they are known as 'discipline and appeal procedure for the bombay state road transport corporation employees'. provision 3 of these provisions divides offences into acts of misconduct and minor lapses and delinquencies. provision 5 details the procedure to be followed when an employee is .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //