Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: road transport corporations act 1950 section 31 power to the corporation to spend Page 13 of about 722 results (0.185 seconds)

U.P.S.R.T.C. Vs. Ram Kishan Arora

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : [2007(3)JCR120(SC)]; (2007)IIILLJ171SC; 2007(6)SCALE721; (2007)4SCC627;

s.b. sinha, j.1. leave granted.2. respondent was working with the appellant corporation constituted under the road transport corporation act as a conductor. he was discharging his duties in the said capacity in the bus bearing registration no. up-07b/2932 plying on dehradun bhukki ..... play. it is now well settled that the industrial courts do not interfere with the quantum of punishment unless there exist sufficient reasons therefore.9. in u.p. state road transport corporation, dehradun v. suresh pal : (2006)iiillj967sc , this court stated the law, thus:normally, the courts do not substitute the punishment unless they are shockingly disproportionate ..... substituting the lighter punishment in exercising the jurisdiction under article 226 of the constitution then it will give a wrong signal in the society. all the state road transport corporations in the country have gone in red because of the misconduct of such kind of incumbents, therefore, it is time that misconduct should be dealt with an .....

Velpur Gram Panchayat and anr. Vs. Asst. Director of Marketing, Guntur ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 1998(1)ALD625

..... market within its building or bus-stand etc. while referring the provisions of the road transport corporation act, 1950 it was pointed out that the corporation was vested with the power to sell or otherwise transfer any property. moreover, the question whether the corporation itself was trading white having the shops as such was also dealt with. ..... for or carry out the aforesaid activities. no infirmity can also be inferred to be arising from the said provisions on the statutory body like the road transport corporation to restrain from making any arrangements or providing any facilities for similar activities to be carried on in the village. the idea behind the entire ..... of the expression 'local authority', and it held that astate transport corporation was not a local authority although it could acquire the land by virtue of the provisions of the land acquisition act. reliance was taken from section 3(17) of the general clauses act, for the purpose of knowing the meaning of the expression ' .....

Managing Director, Apsrtc, Mushirabad, Hyderabad Vs. Institution of A. ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(5)ALD492; 2001(5)ALT799

..... has no jurisdiction to entertain complaints against the andhra pradesh state road transport corporation which is a corporation created under the central act. under section 2(c) of the andhra pradesh state road transport corporation (conduct of meetings) regulations, 1959, corporation means the a.p. state road transport corporation established under section 3 of the road transport corporations act, 1950. section 3 of the road transport corporations act, 1950 says that the state government may, by notification in ..... the official gazette, establish road transport corporation for the whole or any part of the state under such name as may be .....

M.S. Sadananda and ors. Vs. State of Mysore by Its Chief Secretary, Vi ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR1969Kant319; AIR1969Mys319; (1969)1MysLJ359

..... .1. on december 18, 1963 the mysore state road transport corporation established under the road transport corporation act, 1950, which will be referred to in the course of this judgment as the corporation, published a scheme which it had prepared under section 68-c of the motor vehicles act. this scheme appeared in the gazette bearing the date ..... act that four conditions of which section 68 speaks, on the existence of which alone approval could be accorded to a scheme published under section 68-c, did exist. it was urged that the corporation had no material on the basis of which it could form the opinion that for the purpose of providing an efficient, adequate, economical and properly co ordinated road transport ..... the scheme proposed subserve the fourfold objects enunciated in the section 68-c in the interest of public. as urged by the mysore state road transport corporation, the scheme proposed is an integrated one and would provide a seat mileage of 4.9 lakhs as against 3.3, provided by the .....

Pepsu Road Transport Corporation, PatialA. Vs Mangal Singh and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... v. bal mukund bairwa, (2009) 4 scc 299, the services of the employee of the appellant were terminated by virtue of service regulations (statutory) made under section 45 of the road transport corporation act, 1950. this court, while upholding the jurisdiction of the civil court to entertain the suit filed by the employee challenging the order of termination of his services, has held:"38 ..... by virtue of regulation 20(3) and 24 (3) of the regulations.12) the pepsu road transport corporation was constituted in terms of the provisions of the road transport corporations act, 1950 (hereinafter referred to as "the 1950 act"). by reason of the provisions of section 4 thereof, each corporation is a body corporate having perpetual succession and a common seal and can, in its own name, sue and be .....

Depot Manager, Apsrtc, Mushirabad Depot, Hyd. Vs. Presiding Officer, L ...

Court : Andhra Pradesh

Reported in : 2001(6)ALD730; [2002(92)FLR990]

..... job of a driver no educational qualification is necessary. 9. the regulations have been framed by the apsrtc in terms of section 45(1) of the road transport corporation act, 1950 (central act 64 of 1950). regulation 28 enumerates the acts or omissions which would be treated as misconduct. clause (xxii) thereof reads thus: failure on the part of an employee to give full and correct ..... , c.j. 1. the question which arises for consideration is as to whether the charges levelled against the 2nd respondent-workman herein were in consonance with the andhra pradesh state road transport corporation employees (conduct) regulations, 1963. 2. respondent no. 2 was appointed as driver grade iii on 30-11-1985 on daily wage basis and his services were regularized w.e.f .....

Karnataka State Road Transport Corporation Vs. Basavannappa

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1988KAR1667; 1988(1)KarLJ544

..... transport undertakings of other states as also the corporation are established under the same central enactment viz., the road transport corporation act, 1950. having regard to the object and purpose of the road transport corporation act and the establishment of the road transport corporations, the state transport ..... undertakings of each of the states not only form a separate and well defined class, as distinct from private operators, the classification is also a reasonable one.the granting of an exemption in a scheme approved under section 68d (3) of the act ..... disposal of these appeals are as follow : a scheme prepared under section 68c of the act by the karnataka state road transport corporation (the corporation for short) covering as many as 202 routes, for plying stage carriages, in the .....

Uttaranchal Transport Corporation Vs. Sanjay Kumar Nautiyal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2008(3)ALLMR(SC)468; [2008(117)FLR1180]; JT2008(3)SC210; (2008)IILLJ313SC; (2008)3MLJ955(SC); 2008(3)SCALE400; 2008(2)Supreme314; 2008(2)KCCRSN155; 2008AIRSCW1901

..... of notice the respondent has not appeared.3. in v. ramana v. a.p. srtc and ors. : (2005)iiillj725sc it was held as follows:4...in karnataka state road transport corporation v. b.s. hullikatti : (2001)illj725sc , it was held that misconduct in such cases where the bus conductor either had not issued tickets to a large number of ..... denomination, punishment of removal is proper. it is the responsibility of the conductors to collect correct fare charges from the passengers and deposit the same with the corporation. they act in fiduciary capacity and it would be a case of gross misconduct if they do not collect any fare or the correct amount of fare. a conductor ..... of removal/dismissal from service was excessive and labour court was correct in exercising powers provided under section 6(2a) of u.p. industrial disputes act, 1947 (in short the 'act') by setting aside the order of removal/dismissal.before the high court primary stand of the appellant was that in view of the proved mis-conduct .....

Vijay Kumar Sharma and Others Vs. State of Karnataka and Others

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1990SC2072; JT1990(2)SC448; 1990(1)SCALE342; (1990)2SCC562; [1990]1SCR614

..... of the existing permit to any individual or the transfer of such permit to anyone except to the state government or the corporation which it may establish under the karnataka state road transport corporation act, 1950. to make an alternative arrangement for running the contract carriages and to prevent both the misuse of the permits as ..... well as concentration of wealth in the hands of a few individuals, section 20 of the act provided that all contract carriage-permits granted ..... 20 have nothing in common with the provisions of sections 74 and 80 of the motor vehicles act 1988. the former provisions are ancillary to giving effect to the acquisition and nationalisation of the road transport within local territorial limits. the later provisions are general in nature and in furtherence of the object .....

Vijay Shankar Sharma and ors. Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2005(3)ESC2253

..... petitioners in the above mentioned writ petitions are in two categories. the first category of petitioners are those petitioners who were imparted apprenticeship training under the apprenticeship act, 1961 by uttar pradesh state road transport corporation and were given the apprentice certificate and thereafter in the year 1998 they were engaged as contract conductor on the terms and conditions of the contract and had ..... the apex court with regard to selection/appointment of the conductors. under the apprenticeship act, 1961, the petitioners were trained in different trades in the uttar pradesh state road transport corporation. after taking training under the said act, the petitioners represented to the corporation that they should be given employment in the corporation since they have received training and on the said training the public money has .....