Right To Elect - Judgment Search Results

All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Represented by Party Election ...

Court: Chennai

Reported in: AIR2006Mad125

brought within the purview of Section 31 of 'RPA, 1950'. Right from it's substitution, by Amending Act 20/1960, Section 31 had with a claim or an application for inclusion in the electoral roll of his name and a person objecting to the

Federal Election Comm’n Vs. WisconsIn Right to Life, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

BCRA 203. Believing that it nonetheless possessed a First Amendment right to broadcast these ads, WRTL filed suit against the Federal corporate treasury expenditures for express advocacy in connection with federal elections. We held that, [r]egardless of whether th[e] concern [for unfair

State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

grave injustice to crores of other voters who have a right to elect their representatives to the local bodies. It was will amount to interrupting, obstructing or protracting the process of election.17. The only grievance is that the voters' list has not

The State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.

Court: Patna

regard to the provisions for filing objections and also the right of appeal against inclusion, deletion and correction of names and the provisions as quoted above, it is clear that the election as it concerns the returned candidate will be set aside

The Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 1994(3)ALT653

the same will be a flagrant violation of the fundamental right enshrined under Article 21 of the Indian Constitution. It is Commission, or to hold up the election process, because the election process has reached the advanced stage and even the electioneering

State Election Commission Vs. Malladi Rajendra Prasad and ors.

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Reported in: 2006(5)ALD97

of the writ petition shall in no way affect the right of the petitioner to file appropriate petition under Section 233 up at an intermediate stage before any Court. Under the election law, the only significance which the rejection of a nomination

State Election Commission, Bhopal Vs. Ras Bihari Raghuwanshi and ors., ...

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: AIR1995MP245; 1996(0)MPLJ966

the Returning Officer being final, the Election Commission has no right to sit in judgment.On the basis of these findings, the such processual amplitude of power extends to directions to the Election Commission or other appropriate agency to hold a poll, to

Election Commission of India Vs. State of Haryana

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1984SC1406; 1984Supp(1)SCC104; [1984]3SCR554; 1984(16)LC955(SC)

must add that it would be open to the Chief Election Commissioner, as held in Mohd. Yunus v. Shiv Kumar Shastri

Election Commission of India Vs. Shivaji and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1988SC61; JT1987(4)SC298; 1987(2)SCALE996; (1988)1SCC277; [1988]1SCR878

process the Election Commission had the authority to set it right by virtue of power vested in it under Article 324 of the electoral rolls for, and the conduct of all elections to Parliament and to the Legislature of every State and

Election Commission of India and Another Vs. Dr. Subramanian Swamy and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)750; AIR1996SC1810; JT1996(4)SC463; (1996)2MLJ65(SC); 1996(3)SCALE734; (1996)4SCC104; [1996]Supp1SCR637

narrow reading of the said provisions. If Shri Sanghi is right it must necessarily follow that all decisions taken by the delegate some of its functions to the Secretary or Deputy Election Commissioner, subject to such direction as the Election Commission may