Right To Elect - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: right to elect Page 1 of about 878 results (0.018 seconds)All India Anna Dravida Munnetra Kazhagam Represented by Party Election ...
Court: Chennai
Reported in: AIR2006Mad125
brought within the purview of Section 31 of 'RPA, 1950'. Right from it's substitution, by Amending Act 20/1960, Section 31 had it can frame it's own guidelines in the revision of electoral rolls and make it's own legal provisions in regard thereto,
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFederal Election Comm’n Vs. WisconsIn Right to Life, Inc.
Court: US Supreme Court
Federal Election Commn v. Wisconsin Right to Life, Inc. - 06-969 (2007) SYLLABUS OCTOBER TERM, 2006 where that candidate is running, 434(f)(3)(A). In McConnell v. Federal Election Commn, 540 U. S. 93 , this Court upheld 203
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
for the Gram Panchayats and as such the directions were rightly issued by the learned single Judge to prepare a supplementary three-Judges Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar, 2000 (8) SCC 216
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe State Election Commissioner Vs. State of Bihar and ors.
Court: Patna
be done to crores of other voters, who have a right to elect their representatives to the local bodies as a Judge Bench of the Supreme Court in the case of Election Commission of India v. Ashok Kumar : AIR2000SC2979 considered this
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commission of India Vs. Dr. ...
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 1994(3)ALT653
his choice. No fetters can be placed on the said right. If he is restrained from exercising his franchise either physically this connection refer to some of the decided cases. In Election Commission of India v. Shivaji, : [1988]1SCR878 the challenge was
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Election Commission Vs. Malladi Rajendra Prasad and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Reported in: 2006(5)ALD97
the judicial forum; nevertheless the lesson is that the election rights and remedies are statutory, ignore the trifles even if there candidate yet postpone the adjudication of such dispute till the election proceedings are over so as to achieve, in larger public
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTState Election Commission, Bhopal Vs. Ras Bihari Raghuwanshi and ors., ...
Court: Madhya Pradesh
Reported in: AIR1995MP245; 1996(0)MPLJ966
the Returning Officer being final, the Election Commission has no right to sit in judgment.On the basis of these findings, the continuing process of election. If, therefore, during the process of election, at an intermediate or final stage, the entire poll has
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElection Commission of India Vs. State of Haryana
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1984SC1406; 1984Supp(1)SCC104; [1984]3SCR554; 1984(16)LC955(SC)
unprecedented situation like the present? On the one hand the Election Commission appeared to have been altogether oblivious to the dimension
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElection Commission of India Vs. Shivaji and ors.
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: AIR1988SC61; JT1987(4)SC298; 1987(2)SCALE996; (1988)1SCC277; [1988]1SCR878
part in the said elections had been deprived of their right to participate in the said election. Along with the writ been recognised to be a matter of first importance that elections should be concluded as early as possible according to time
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTElection Commission of India and Another Vs. Dr. Subramanian Swamy and ...
Court: Supreme Court of India
Reported in: 1996IIIAD(SC)750; AIR1996SC1810; JT1996(4)SC463; (1996)2MLJ65(SC); 1996(3)SCALE734; (1996)4SCC104; [1996]Supp1SCR637
narrow reading of the said provisions. If Shri Sanghi is right it must necessarily follow that all decisions taken by the Subject to the provisions of Sub-section (2), if the Chief Election Commissioner and other Election Commissioners differ in opinion on any
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>