Reverse Stock Split - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: reverse stock split Year: 2016 Page 1 of about 9,381 results (0.098 seconds)

Jan 27 2016 (HC)

D. Krishnamoorthy Vs. State by Inspector of Police

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-27-2016

only on the basis of the endorsements made on the reverse sides of the concerned purchase bills in fact this court conclusion that necessary entries have not been made in the stock register if the goods mentioned in the purchase bills have

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2016 (HC)

Rohit Ferro Tech Ltd. Vs. The Chief Commissioner of Central Exercise a ...

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Apr-01-2016

of rs 1 50 05 658 pursuant to the joint stock verification conducted in september 2015 the order of march 15

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 11 2016 (SC)

Jindal Stainless Ltd. and Anr. Vs. State of Haryana and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Nov-11-2016

..... relied upon by the majority have it was contended been reversed by subsequent pronouncements of the australian high court which pronouncements ..... the constitutional validity of the impugned state enactments can be split into two parts the first part which can be briefly ..... on 15 10 2016 http censusindia gov in 2011census censusinfodashboard stock profiles en i nd032 kerala pdf haryana state profile census .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 29 2016 (HC)

Shah Faruq Shabir and Others Vs. Govindrao Ramu Vasave and Others

Court: Mumbai Aurangabad

Decided on: Jun-29-2016

defence was raised by the twelve mlas in respect of split in the bsp party on 21 10 1997 that they

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 22 2016 (HC)

Adi Dara Patel and Others Vs. S. R. Jondhale and Others

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-22-2016

termed as illegal or null and void the position is reverse because all co owners advised as they were by competent

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 31 2016 (SC)

Kedar Nath Yadav Vs. State of West Bengal and Ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Aug-31-2016

this court in paras 76 77 78 and 79 took stock of the contention whereby it was suggested that land far it is in the larger public interest it cannot be split into different components and to consider whether each and every

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 08 2016 (SC)