Returnable - Year 2003 - Judgments

Jan 09 2003 (HC)

Vijaysingh Krishnarao Parbat Vs. Returning Officer, Janata Sahakari Ba ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-09-2003

Reported in: 2003(2)ALLMR523; 2003(5)BomCR330; 2003(2)MhLj485

..... consent the rule is made returnableforthwith 2 the petitioner challenges the orders passed bythe returning officer and the appellate authorityrejected his nomination paper for election to themanaging committing of ..... the nomination paper of thepetitioner in the appeal carried from the said order ofthe returning officer the appellate authority whiledealing with the same under section 152a of the said .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2003 (HC)

Shri Duryodhan Mahadev Kale, Vs. Election Returning Officer, Grampanch ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-09-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR912; 2003(6)BomCR216; 2004(2)MhLj861

..... declaration of result in certain cases it reads as under 34 returning officer to declare result of election 1 on completion of the ..... high court was small margin of votes 19 votes between the returned candidate and the defeated candidate reversing the order of the high court ..... high court was small margin of votes 19 votes between the returned candidate and the defeated candidate 2 on the basis of evidence .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 30 2003 (HC)

N. Vellaichamy Vs. the Returning Officer Cum Commissioner,

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-30-2003

Reported in: (2003)2MLJ660

..... said election nominations were filed by the present petitioner and the third respondent the assistant returning officer second respondent was authorised to conduct the election 2 it is the case of ..... procedure as is likely to vitiate the poll is committed at the polling station the returning officer shall forthwith report the matter to district election officer and the state election commission .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 13 2003 (HC)

Baburao Gangaram Gadiwad Vs. the Assistant Registrar of Co-operative S ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-13-2003

Reported in: 2003(4)ALLMR526; 2004(1)BomCR364

..... 427 of 2003 2 this court issued notice on 3 6 2003 which was made returnable today the notice indicated that the matter was to be finally disposed of at the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 11 2003 (HC)

Smt. Latha G. Krishna Vs. the Returning Officer, Dasarahalli City Muni ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-11-2003

Reported in: ILR2003KAR3402

..... same is directory 8 a division bench of this court in s shekar vs commissioner returning officer bangalore city corporation air 1999 kar 174 was also dealing with a somewhat similar .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 07 2003 (TRI)

Peerless General Finance and Vs. Jt. Cit

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-07-2003

Reported in: (2003)85ITD215(Kol.)

..... be carried forward in view of late submission of income tax returns aggrieved by assessing officers declining to carry forward the aforesaid ..... of losses under section 80 restricted to rather broad category of returns filed under section 139 the observations of their lordships in ..... anything contained in any other provision of this act a return of income which shows the total income below the maximum .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 16 2003 (TRI)

Assistant Commissioner of Income Vs. Naresh Kumar Aggarwal

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Decided on: Jun-16-2003

Reported in: (2004)90ITD616(Delhi)

..... lacunae and to justify the claims made in the original return according to the learned departmental representative once the process of ..... and having found himself in a lurch filed a revised return and thus is guilty of having furnished inaccurate particulars of ..... a voluntary disclosure under section 68 and filed a revised return disclosing higher incomes and the assessment were framed under revised .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 24 2003 (TRI)

Suhas K. Lunkad Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Decided on: Mar-24-2003

Reported in: (2004)82TTJ(Pune.)934

..... a of section 158bc which prescribes the provisions regarding filing of the return therefore any return filed will be a return filed under clause a of section 158bc 12 so far as penalty ..... for the block period under consideration since there is no difference between the assessed and returned undisclosed income therefore whether penalty provided in relation to that portion of undisclosed income which .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 29 2003 (HC)

Ralson Carbon Black Ltd. Vs. State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Jul-29-2003

Reported in: [2004]137STC527(P& H)

..... tax due from him under the act in accordance with the returns or revised returns submitted by him under sub section 4 or sub section ..... tax due from him under the act in accoradance with the returns or revised returns submitted by him under sub section 4 or sub section ..... tax due from him under the act in accordance with the returns or revised returns submitted by him under sub section 4 or sub section .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2003 (TRI)

Joint Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Bihar State Credit and Investment

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Decided on: Dec-05-2003

Reported in: (2004)91ITD136(Pat.)

..... difference separately as under whether the tribunal has power to go beyond or behind the return accounts or documents either in allowing or disallowing any such deduction allowance or relief ..... forward deduction allowance or relief claimed which on the basis of information available in the return or the accompanying accounts or documents is prima facie inadmissible the earlier instructions of the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Returnable - Judgment Search Results