Returnable - Judgment Search Results

Khatib, Irshad Ahmed, Mohammed HussaIn and Others Vs. the Returning Of ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1998KAR1813; 2000(3)KarLJ455

..... of any defect which is not of substantial character sub rule 5 prohibits the returning officer from adjourning the proceedings of scrutinising the nominations except under certain circumstances ..... reservation is justified and eligible to contest against those seats reserved for particular category returning officer without complying with the mandatory requirement of rule 5 proceeds to reject the .....

Keshubhai Merubhai Maadam Vs. the Returning Officer

Court: Gujarat

Reported in: (1998)2GLR548

..... nomination this provision is very important as while rejecting nomination papers of the petitioner the returning officer has exercised his powers under section 36 read with section 33 it would ..... court is satisfied that the present election petition filed by the petitioner against election of returned candidate respondent no 2 dr alagh now union minister and seeking declaration that the petitioner .....

Bittagowdanahalli Milk Producers' Co-operative Society Limited, Distri ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: ILR1997KAR2335; 1998(2)KarLJ158

..... an interim order was made on that date directing 1st respondent returning officer to permit the petitioners to vote in the election ..... to be declared 5 writ petition was presented only against the returning officer and the co operative society in question respondents 3 ..... petitions are not maintainable against the society r l is the returning officer and he is appointed by the registrar of cooperative .....

Mange Ram Vs. District Development and Panchayat Officer-cum-returning ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Reported in: AIR1998P& H78; (1997)117PLR331

ordersat pal j 1 in this petition petitioner mange ram has prayed for setting aside the election of respondent no...

N. C. E. (P.) Ltd. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1998)65ITD214(Kol.)

..... is of one year from the date of filing of the return or revised return under sub section 4 or 5 of section 139 as we ..... days as prescribed in the notice for these reasons this return cannot be termed as return furnished under section 139 2 according to the hon ..... case of kumar jagdish chandra sinha supra that the revised return is an invalid return it is a futile exercise and repetition of the subject .....

Assistant Commissioner of Vs. Kumar Ice

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Reported in: (1998)64ITD93(Pat.)

..... assessing officer at gaya the minors ladies and other relatives have filed their income tax returns at calcutta declaring their permanent residence at 10 ezra street calcutta which the assessing officer ..... a misconception that the confirmatory letters copies of statements of incomes accompanying the income tax returns filed at calcutta were filed before the cit appeals but not before the assessing .....

Nirmal Udyog Co. Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Mumbai

Reported in: (1998)65ITD73(Mum.)

..... assessee submitted that amnesty scheme was available upto 31st march 1987 and the revised return making the disclosure of amounts representing expenses and investments were filed on 3rd march ..... had come into possession of unquestionable evidence regarding concealment of income before assessee filed returns purportedly under amnesty scheme disclosure claim was held to be not voluntary and in good .....

Chetna Enterprises Vs. Income-tax Officer

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Patna

Reported in: (1997)63ITD257(Pat.)

..... both the years under section 148 by the assessing officer even after filing of the return the assessee objected to the assumption of jurisdiction by the assessing officer for issuing notices ..... under section 147 148 after receipt of notices under section 148 the assessee filed nil returns since the assessee did not co operate and participate in the reopened proceedings the assessing .....

C.E. Bailey Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

..... figures of salary and perquisites allowed to various employees some of the employees furnished revised returns declaring such higher amount of salary and perquisites as were agreed by the employer company ..... allowances received and all perquisites availed by these employees should have been disclosed in the return of income the cit a therefore rejected the explanations submitted on behalf of these .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Voest Alpine

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata

Reported in: (1998)67ITD219Cal

..... dt 11th december 1996 and directed the ao to treat the return as a valid return furnished as per r 41 2 along with the formal ..... contractor he further argued that the cit a declared the return to be valid return filed for getting refund under r 41 2 of the ..... 244a of the act 10 we find that while scrutinising the return and declaring the return invalid under s 139 9 the ao has completely ignored .....