Skip to content


Returnable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: returnable Sorted by: recent Year: 1956 Page 1 of about 300 results (0.428 seconds)
Dec 31 1956 (HC)

Zankarsingh and ors. Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and anr.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-31-1956

Reported in: AIR1957MP78

..... from 8 12 1930 its superintendence terminated on 16 4 1946 when the estate was returned to the plaintiff during this period decrees were obtained against persons owing money to the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 28 1956 (HC)

State of Andhra (Now Andhra Pradesh) Vs. Bellamkonda Venkata Subbaiah ...

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-28-1956

Reported in: [1957]8STC309(AP)

..... in tax revision case no 32 of 1956 was charged for wilful submission of untrue returns and for not keeping a true and correct account as required by section 13 of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 27 1956 (HC)

Mohd. Abdul Ghani Hamid Vs. the State

Court: Andhra Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-27-1956

Reported in: 1957CriLJ703

..... and nizam would be caliph 4 that he would go to pakistan and on his return would surely find the present government not in power it is clear from these that ..... to make the nizam the caliph and predicting the fall of present government before his return from pakistan which are sufficiently provocative to excite and rouse the passions of communally minded .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (SC)

Pannalal Binjraj and Another Vs. the Union of India and Others. (and O ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: [1957]31ITR565(SC)

..... resulting in large profits not disclosed in the books of account or in the various returns filed by them after the judgment of this court in suraj mull mohtas case about .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (HC)

Tejilal Vs. State

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: AIR1957MP88

..... view that we hold of the present case 6 the appellant had denied in his return that he took the stall for himself or had any interest in it kotwal j ..... fee rs 50 in each court 9 the outstanding amount of the security shall be returned to the appellant and berar municipalities act cannot be said to be well based

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (HC)

Kishori Lal Raghbir Dass Vs. the State

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: AIR1957P& H78; 1957CriLJ475

..... section 363 i p c had been registered kishori lal and mst munni on their return were taken into custody by the police near the railway station jullundur cantt on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (SC)

Pannalal Binjraj Vs. Union of India (Uoi)

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: AIR1957SC397; [1957]1SCR233

..... resulting in large profits not disclosed in the books of account or in the various returns filed by them after the judgment of this court in surajmull mohta co v a .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (SC)

Harish Chandra Bajpai Vs. Triloki Singh

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: AIR1957SC444; [1957]1SCR370

..... than the date of publication of the name or names of the returned candidate or candidates at such election under s 67 as may ..... is stated that the nomination had been wrongly accepted or that the returned candidate was not entitled to stand for election then s 83 ..... and have in fact been shown by the first appellant in the return of election expenses against column k now the contention of the respondent .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 1956 (HC)

Rabindra Nath Mahapatra and ors. Vs. Gour Mondal

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Dec-21-1956

Reported in: AIR1957Cal274,61CWN311

..... revision cases 3397 3398 and 3399of 1955 were after the answer of the full bench returned to the referring division bench consisting of p n mookerji and p k sarkar jj .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 1956 (FN)

Lister Vs. Romford Ice and Cold Storage Company Limited

Court: House of Lords

Decided on: Dec-20-1956

..... naturally contrasted with the general principle that an implication must be precise and obvious i return then to the original pleas these i remind your lordships were contained in paragraphs 4 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //