Returnable - Judgment Search Results

Cce, New Delhi Vs. M/S. Hero Metal Cast Engg.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

..... are also availing the facility of modvat credit on inputs scrutiny of r t 12 returns of the assessee revealed that modvat was availed by the assessee on invoices which were ..... mendatory for the assessee to follow that by no strech of imagination the defective rejected returned goods could be construed as inputs by simply pleading that the same were nothing but .....

Harikumar Rajah Vs. Sovereign Dairy Industries Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2001)106CompCas191

..... as respondents the main acts of oppression and mismanagement relate to non filing of statutory returns non finalization of the accounts of the company misuse of the properties and misappropriation of .....

Samrat Holdings Limited Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... tax officer is satisfied that any person has without reasonable cause failed to furnish the return of income thus the burden is ultimately on the assessee to plead and prove the ..... any undue gain 6 4 5 3 the fact of non submission of a report return within the specified time period irrespective of mens rea or any other condition therefore attracts .....

M/S. Cabot International Capital Vs. Adjudicating Officer and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

..... the proposed allotment to the stock exchange and filed the requisite returns with registrar of companies reporting to the stock exchange is ..... 16 4 1997 addressed to the registrar of companies forwarding the return of allotment also the company had stated that the allotment ..... any person has without reasonable cause failed to furnish the return of income thus the burden is ultimately on the assessee .....

Madura Coats Ltd. Vs. Maritime Collector

Court: Chennai

Reported in: 2002(83)ECC848; 2001(131)ELT328(Mad)

..... law laid down by the supreme court and the petitioners are accordingly entitled to the return of the excise duty 12 in reply the learned counsel appearing on behalf of the .....

Engee Electronics Vs. Industries Commissioner and ors.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Reported in: [2001]122STC12(MP)

..... and questioned the correctness of the view taken therein 7 the state by filing the return has supported the impugned orders 8 heard shri g m chafekar learned senior counsel with .....

K. Shankarappa Vs. K.G. Gangadharaiah (Deceased by L. Rs.) and ors.

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR2001Kant203; ILR2001KAR2292

..... may before determining the question direct any subordinate court to try the question and to return the records together with evidence if any recorded at such trial its findings and reasons .....

income Tax Officer Vs. Bajoria Foundation

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: (2001)71TTJ(Cal)343

..... section 13 1 c was attracted additions were made to the nil returned income on account of i rs 5 07 022 on account of ..... inquiries were not conducted with regard to the claims made in the return of the assessee and that the case was fixed for hearing on ..... were already filed before the assessing officer along with the income tax return it is also not revenue s case that filing of additional evidence .....

Muthoottu Mini Kuries Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: (2001)166CTR(Ker)180

..... and other details on which he relied in support of the returns filed it is averred that the petitioner s authorised representative ..... objective assessment the assessing officer had not bothered to examine the returns or to understand the nature of the accounts that had ..... and other details on which he relied in support of the returns filed it is averred that the petitioner s authorised representative .....

Muthoottu Mini Kuries Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income-tax and anr.

Court: Kerala

Reported in: [2001]250ITR455(Ker)

..... and other details on which he relied in support of the returns filed it is averred that the petitioner s authorised representative ..... assessment the assessing officer had not bothered to examine the returns or to understand the nature of the accounts that had ..... submitted that the statement of accounts filed along with the returns showed that the material facts disclosed were not sufficient to .....