Retrogression - Judgment Search Results

Thiagasambandham Pillai and anr. Vs. Savithiri Ammal and anr.

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1999)2MLJ264

a raman j 1 at the request of the counsel both these appeals were heard together 2 s a no...

Saraswathi Vs. Radhakrishnan and Others

Court: Chennai Madurai

prayer criminal original petition filed under section 482 of the code of criminal procedure praying to call for the records...

State of Kerala ,rep.,by Secretary, Vs. P.V.Ramanandan and Others

Court: Kerala

in the high court of keralaat ernakulam present the honourable mr justice b kemal pasha tuesday the7h day of october201415th...

High Court of Kerala Vs. Pritish Nandy

Court: Kerala

Reported in: 1985CriLJ1963

k bhaskaran c j 1 the illustrated weekly of india has a pride of place so we understand in the...

income-tax Officer Vs. Adarsh Construction Company (Dissolved Firm).

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: [1968]70ITR796(All)

v g oak j this special appeal arises out of assessment process under the income tax act 1922 hereafter referred...

Manisree T. Vs. State of Kerala

Court: Kerala

in the high court of kerala at ernakulam present the honourable mr justice b kemal pasha tuesday the20h day of...

Shri M. Irshad Ali, Shri K.T. Vs. Commissioner of Customs, Chennai

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Reported in: (2002)(80)ECC363

1 all these set of appeals raises a common question of law and facts they all pertain to confiscation imposition...

Reno Vs. Bossier Parish School Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 425 u s 130 140 it is designed to combat only those effects that are retrogressive retrogression by definition requires a comparison of a jurisdiction s new voting plan with its existing ..... then the proposed voting practice is measured against the existing voting practice to determine whether retrogression would result from the proposed change it also necessarily implies that the jurisdiction s .....

Reno Vs. Bossier Parish School Bd.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1976 which holds that the only anticipated redistricting effect sufficient to bar preclearance is retrogression in minority voting strength however dilutive of minority voting power a redistricting plan may ..... it shares with the amendment abridgment under 5 presumably covers any vote dilution not retrogression alone and no redistricting scheme should receive preclearance without a showing that it is .....

Georgia Vs. Ashcroft

Court: US Supreme Court

..... effectiveness a reduction in supermajority districts must be treated as potentially and fatally retrogressive the burden of persuasion always being on the state the district court majority perfectly ..... 5 from any practical and administrable conception of minority influence that would rule out retrogression in a transition from majorityminority districts and mistakes the significance of the evidence supporting .....