Resolved - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: resolved Year: 2001 Page 1 of about 941 results (0.018 seconds)Sms Schloemann Siemag, A.G. Vs. Dy. Cit and anr.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Apr-26-2001
Reported in: [2001]250ITR97(AP)
s b sinha c j reference to this bench has been made by a division bench of this court having...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaimullah Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh and ors.
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-12-2001
Reported in: 2001(4)AWC2517; (2001)3UPLBEC2594
s h a raza j 1 factual matrix as set out in the writ petition in short compass is that...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCommissioner of Income-tax Vs. Eklingji Trust
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Feb-23-2001
Reported in: (2001)167CTR(Raj)367; [2001]250ITR699(Raj)
rajesh balia j 1 heard learned counsel for the parties 2 this is a reference made at the instance of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSudha Shankar and Prem Shankar Vs. Jagdish Lal and Others
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Apr-18-2001
Reported in: 2001(2)AWC1594
..... overruling the decision of this court in shanti prasad s case supra the controversy was resolved by the apex court in pyare lal s case supra interpreting the provisions of section .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTWeston Electronics Ltd. and ors. Vs. State Bank of India
Court: DRAT Delhi
Decided on: Nov-21-2001
..... respondent bank on 20 11 2001 in which it was resolved as follows resolved that letter no cbd 1202 dated 17 4 1995 ..... the bank for various credit facilities granted to the company further resolved that the enclosed revival documents received under cover of the ..... in accordance with the articles of association of the company further resolved that shri sunder t vachani chairman and managing director of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKaramsad Investments Limited, Vs. Nile Limited and ors.
Court: Andhra Pradesh
Decided on: Aug-16-2001
Reported in: [2002]46CLA23(AP); [2002]108CompCas58(AP); (2002)1CompLJ251(AP)
..... 2001 i e karamsad holdings limited hereinafter referred to as khl resolved to acquire up to 6 00 380 shares of the respondent ..... of 2001 viz karamsad investments limited hereinafter referred to as kil resolved to acquire up to four lakhs of equity shares of the ..... concerned the same board by another resolution dated october 30 1998 resolved to refuse registration of the ownership of the shares acquired by .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTFerguson Vs. Charleston
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
..... randomly 11 the dissent would have us do otherwise and resolve the issue of consent in favor of respondents because the ..... the judgment furthermore should not be interpreted as having considered or resolved the important questions raised by justice scalia with reference to ..... the issue in the present case the constitution does not resolve all difficult social questions but leaves the vast majority of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTEgelhoff Vs. Egelhoff
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-21-2001
..... to make payments until any dispute among putative beneficiaries is resolved 11 07 010 3 b but if administrators do pay ..... that the washington statute permits a plan administrator to avoid resolving the dispute himself and to let courts or parties settle ..... burden somehow overwhelming the plan could easily avoid it by resolving the divorce revocation issue in the plan documents themselves stating .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTChickasaw Nation Vs. United States
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Nov-27-2001
..... very least gives the subsection an ambiguity that can be resolved by applying the canon that statutes are to be construed ..... 35 makes the subsection ambiguous and they ask us to resolve the ambiguity by applying a special indian related interpretative canon ..... the text legislative history or underlying policies of 2719 d clearly resolves the contradiction inherent in the section it is appropriate to .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTins Vs. St. Cyr
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-25-2001
..... have withdrawn that power from federal judges and provided no adequate substitute the need to resolve such a serious and difficult constitutional question and the desirability of avoiding that necessity ..... by eliminating respondent s eligibility for a waiver the ins submits that the statute resolves the issue because it unambiguously communicates congress intent to apply the provisions of iirira .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial