Reserve And Auxiliaryair Forces Act 1952 Section 5 - Judgment Search Results

Sumitomo Corporation Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court : Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

Reported in : (2008)114ITD61(Delhi)

in new delhi was established with the approval of the reserve bank of india hereinafter referred to as rbi for facilitating income under the act and under the corresponding law in force in that country section 90 2 provides that where such the total income of every person section 5 of the act explains the scope of total income of every person section 30 per cent in view of the provisions contained in section 115a instead of assessee s claim of tax 20 per supervision pe of assessee in india in terms of article 5 4 of the dtaa we have already narrated the scope

P. Srinivasulu Vs. Dy. Inspector General of Police, C.R.P.F., Allahaba ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 2002(2)AWC1388

as follows a central reserve police force regular b central reserve police force auxiliary 2 officers subordinate officers and other persons against the petitioner under rule 27 of central reserve police force rules 1955 by memorandum dated 22 4 2000 annexure 4 4 can very well include sub inspector m from the act and the rules it does not appear that any separate or for training under the order of the director general section 5 also provides forcomposition of the force section 5 provides for training under the order of the director general section 5 also provides forcomposition of the force section 5 provides that

Personnel Adm'r of Massachusetts Vs. Feeney

Court : US Supreme Court

not long after the united states marine corps women s reserve and the coast guard women s reserve spar were established nurse who was honorably discharged from the united states armed forces after at least 90 days of active service at least that the decisionmaker selected or reaffirmed a particular course of action at least in part because of not merely in spite the order of their respective standing 3 persons described in section twenty three b the widow or widowed mother of a g res of mar 3 1865 no 27 13 stat 571 hiring preference for disabled veterans see generally house committee on

Kush Kalra vs.union of India & Anr.

Court : Delhi

p c no 10498 2015 and cm no 44852 2016 reserved on 30 h november 2017 date of decision 5 h w p c no 10498 2015 page 31 of 44 forces except in such department branch or other body forming part no rationale has been offered to justify or sustain the action of the respondents enforcing a bar against recruitment of women was concerned with a challenge to the constitutional validity of section 30 of the punjab excise act 1914 which prohibited employment by notification in the official gazette specify in this behalf 54 clearly the stand of the respondents reading an implied bar

Mccarroll Vs. Dixie Greyhound Lines, Inc.

Court : US Supreme Court

appellee s routes taken together the taxed gasoline which is reserved for extrastate use is substantially more than that consumed on and this act shall take effect and be in full force from and after its passage footnote 2 act 11 second district court appellee unsuccessfully sought an injunction against this threatened action the circuit court of appeals eighth circuit took a different motor vehicles until the state tax thereon has been paid section 2 any person co partnership or company violating the provisions to the larger interests of a national commerce footnote 2 5 as both the union and the state are more and

Kukheswar Saikia Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court : Guwahati

coi was therefore held under rule 31 of the central reserve police force rules 1955 hereinafter referred to as the crpf who was a person subject to the central reserve police forces act hereinafter referred to as the crpf act has approached to imprisonment for having committed some offence s under the act question of invoking section 12 and or dismissing him from authority appear to have misunderstood the scope and ambit of section 11 inasmuch as each of the four grounds for which and mr bipul sharma learned addl cgsc for the respondents 5 it has been submitted on behalf of the petitioner that

In Re: Tripura Modern Bank Ltd.; Her Highness Maharani Regent Mohadebi ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1950Cal240,54CWN262

which really removed the fetter whereby a certificate of the reserve bank was made a condition precedent to the court s as he did in view of the ordinance then in force 7 on appeal it was contended by mr s c its enactments unles in express terms they apply to pending actions do not affect them it is said that there is lal in that case the patna high court had declared section 11 bihar money lenders act act iii 3 of 1938 50 000 and a paid up capital of rs 15 54 000 it was made a scheduled bank in the year

Malkiat Singh Khela Vs. Union of India and anr.

Court : Supreme Court of India

of commission b mobilized commissioned service in the indian naval reserve indian army in india reserve of officers or called up commissioned service as an officer of the late indian territorial force or of the late auxiliary force india or of the which was forfeited under section 82 f l of the act 17 in the instant case though the appellant has completed upon such service 14 after noticing sub section 12 of section 82 appendix iii framed under regulation 20 of the navy was tried by a court martial in the year 1989 5 after the inquiry the court martial has held that the

Indian Air Force Employees Union Vs. State of Maharashtra,

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : 2003(2)ALLMR804; 2003(5)BomCR817; 2003(4)MhLj609

in any part of the world including personsbelonging to the reserve forces and theterritorial army when called out on permanentservice the of petitioner union did not fall within definition of armed forces as defined in section 27 a a petitioners not entitled civil servicerules could be curtained under section 21 of thearmy act the employees therein had taken astand that they were not the tax under the said act it iscontended that under section 27 a of the saidact members of armed forces of clause isdeleted by maharashtra act 28 2000 with effectfrom 1 5 2000 10 this court in pratiraksha mazdoor casesurveyed the history

Madan Tiwari, Constable Vs. Deputy Inspector General of Police (Group ...

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : 1999(4)AWC2908; (1999)2UPLBEC1494

a strict military discipline for the members of the central reserve police force the object of creation of the force appears constitution applies to civil servant and in case of armed forces the different rules may be framed and the same are to dismissal on imprisonment 1 every person sentenced under this act to imprisonment may be dismissed from the force and shall by forfeiture of pay etc by sub section 2 of section 12 it has been provided that if dismissal does not the punishing authority is d i g p the remaining 5 categories of punishment from sl nos 7 to 11 the