Skip to content

Did you mean: preventive?


Resentive - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: resentive Year: 2004 Page 1 of about 63 results (0.003 seconds)
Feb 25 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mutual Inds. Ltd. and ors.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Feb-25-2004

1 1 m s mutual industries are the main respondents they have two factories one at kandivali and the other...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 17 2004 (HC)

Delhi Transport Corporation Vs. N.L. Kakkar Presiding Officer, Industr ...

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Mar-17-2004

Reported in: 2004(73)DRJ568; [2004(101)FLR777]; 2004(3)SLJ366(Delhi)

madan b lokur j 1 the petitioner dtc is aggrieved by orders dated 25th april 1977 and 11th july 1979...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 05 2004 (HC)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Mil India Ltd.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Nov-05-2004

Reported in: 2005(98)ECC709; 2008(222)ELT497(All)

r k agrawal j 1 in the present appeal filed under section 35g of central excise act 1944 hereinafter referred...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 15 2004 (TRI)

Shri Mahesh Parikh Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Dec-15-2004

Reported in: (2005)62SCL32SAT

1 the appeal is taken up with consent of parties for final disposal certain directions were issued under section 11b...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 10 2004 (TRI)

Tower Steels (i) Ltd. Vs. Cc

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-10-2004

Reported in: (2005)(118)LC85Tri(Chennai)

1 the appellants imported a consignment of goods declared as light melting scrap misprint sheets sheet cutting scrap weighing 193...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 09 2004 (TRI)

Commissioner of C. Ex. and Cus. Vs. Mehar Shoes Industries

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Jun-09-2004

Reported in: (2004)(172)ELT409Tri(Kol.)kata

1 this appeal has been filed against the order in appeal dated 26th september 2002 passed by the commissioner of...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 28 2004 (SC)

State of Rajasthan and anr. Vs. J.K. Udaipur Udyog Ltd. and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-28-2004

Reported in: JT2004(8)SC137; 2004(8)SCALE288; (2004)7SCC673; [2004]137STC438(SC)

..... agree to the said appointment since ec did not agree to it cil filed the resent application under section 11 5 of the arbitration and conciliation act 1996 for appointment of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 04 2004 (HC)

State of M.P. and anr. Vs. Sushri Manorama Gour

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Nov-04-2004

Reported in: 2005(2)MPHT108; 2005(2)MPLJ323

..... quashed by single judge on ground that two councillors were not present at time of resentation of proposal said finding is not sustainable for reasons that signatures of councillors present on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 30 2004 (HC)

Rati Traders Vs. K.P. Pouches Pvt. Ltd.

Court: Madhya Pradesh

Decided on: Jul-30-2004

Reported in: 2004(29)PTC254(MP)

..... of temporary injunction strong prima facie case has to be made out by respondent in resent case from initial evidences produced by parties it established that respondent was using the trade .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 16 2004 (HC)

Mahalingappa Vs. Kenchamma

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Sep-16-2004

Reported in: ILR2004KAR4689; 2004(7)KarLJ549

..... the decided cases there were veiled attempts to nullify the judgment or order in the resent case on hand it is a positive declaration that notwithstanding a judgment or order of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //