Request - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: request Court: mumbai Year: 1980 Page 1 of about 223 results (0.353 seconds)Venubai Widow of Bajirao Ingale and anr. Vs. Saraswatibai Alias Sumitr ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-16-1980
Reported in: 1980MhLJ907
was thus dismissed appeal therefrom also failed hence this second appeal 6 before proceeding ahead the relevant provisions of the two
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra State Electricity Board Vs. M.C. Chitale and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jul-14-1980
Reported in: [1980(41)FLR199]; (1981)ILLJ462Bom
..... the maharashtra state electricity board is involved in the present petition 2 to discuss the core question it will be necessary ..... case has no application to the point involved in the present petition that the petitioner is an authority falling within the definition ..... exemption and have decided the said point 17 to conclude the petition is dismissed and rule discharged no costs labour and industrial .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCajubhai Balabhai Pradhan Vs. the State of Maharashtra
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-30-1980
Reported in: 1982(1)BomCR284; 1981CriLJ209
order1 the rule in this application raises a narrow question whether the petitioner accused has by his act or omission...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTCentral Bank of India Vs. New India Assurance Co. Ltd.
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-14-1980
Reported in: [1983]53CompCas522(Bom)
the trial judge dismissed the suit and the court of appeal confirmed that decree on the ground that the loss suffered
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSarabhai M. Chemicals Private Ltd. Vs. P.N. Mittal Competent Authority ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Feb-05-1980
Reported in: (1980)16CTR(Bom)315; [1980]126ITR1(Bom); [1980]3TAXMAN541(Bom)
..... letter dated september 7 1973 part of annex d to the petition in special civil application no 1394 of 1973 ultimately on ..... the learned advocate general appearing for the respective petitioner in each petition has contended that what he is challenging in these special civil ..... the first affidavit filed by the appellant in support of his petition but in the affidavit in rejoinder filed by the appellant .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSugar Selling Agency P. Ltd. and Another Vs. R. Kannan, Income-tax Off ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Mar-13-1980
Reported in: [1981]130ITR801(Bom)
..... of the appellant company and has joined in filing this writ petition 3 the particular clause of the said agreement which is material ..... ultimately the appellant company and the second appellant filed the writ petition out of which this appeal arises to quash and set aside ..... any of them 10 the learned single judge who heard that petition came to the conclusion that the appellant company was under an .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAmar Dye-chem. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-11-1980
Reported in: 1982(10)ELT948(Bom)
..... came to be rejected this view of the union government is now challenged in this petition 3 it appears that it is wholly unnecessary for us to go into the ..... chandurkar j 1 the only question which has been argued in this petition is whether beta naphthol is excisable under item 14d of the central excise tariff ..... naphthol was excisable under item 14d the petitioners to get the costs of this petition
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTD.R. Kohli, Collector of Central Excise and Others Vs. Associated Film ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Aug-05-1980
Reported in: 1983(12)ELT754(Bom)
..... the judgment and order dated january 29 1975 passed by bhatt j allowing the respondents petition under article 226 of the constitution of india 2 the facts which are not in ..... rejected the petitioners challenged the various orders of demand made to them by filing the petition under article 226 of the constitution before the learned trial judge two principal contentions were .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKores (India) Limited Vs. Union of India and Others
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Nov-17-1980
Reported in: 1982(10)ELT253(Bom)
..... the teleprinter machines are printed the process of making teleprinter rolls as stated in the petition is really not complicated the petitioners purchase from paper manufacturers and or paper dealers paper ..... in their opinion no central excise duty was applicable to the teleprinter rolls the petitioners requested the superintendent to visit their factory and inform them the correct position in the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMaharashtra Vegetable Products Pvt. Ltd. and Another Vs. Union of Indi ...
Court: Mumbai
Decided on: Jun-21-1980
Reported in: 1981(8)ELT468(Bom)
..... freight marketing and distribution expenses since a major part of the controversy involved in the petition is concluded by a decision of this court which held that post manufacturing expenses ..... already recovered excise duty from customers existence of alternative remedy not exclusive bar to entertain petition under article 226 petitioners entitled to refund as claim for refund cannot be rejected .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT