Request - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: request Court: mumbai Year: 1934 Page 1 of about 168 results (0.13 seconds)Yeshvanta BIn Bala Gaekwad Vs. Antu BIn Navaji Salunke
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-24-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom351; (1934)36BOMLR671
..... because of his demise held high court of bombay is not correct in rejecting arbitration petition filed by appellant on ground of lack of jurisdiction justice baker on almost precisely similar .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Collector of Gorakhpur Vs. Ram Sundar Mal
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jun-11-1934
Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR867
the exclusion of his widow on whose behalf the present appeal is presented the contention of the respondents was that lndarjit
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTRachotappa Ishvarappa Vs. Konher Annarao Deshpande
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-12-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom41; (1934)36BOMLR1083; 155Ind.Cas.516
their costs from the other party even in letters patent appeal no 13 so far as that case is concerned we
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKrishnarao Raghunath Yardi Vs. Ghaman Ghama Valad Chima
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-15-1934
Reported in : (1934)36BOMLR1074
from creditors the suit was decided in 1920 and in appeal the decision of the lower court was confirmed in august
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAbdul Karim Haji Dagubhai Vs. the Secretary of State for India
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-15-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom489; (1934)36BOMLR1064
..... section 208 of the bombay land revenue code if therefore a petition of appeal must be accompanied by the order appealed against then ..... the government but the right may be only of a revisional petition under section 211 of the bombay land revenue code but i ..... plaintiff s own statements in the plaint and his deposition the original petition was to the collector and not to any subordinate officer with .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTThe Secretary of State for India Vs. Rajaram Parashram Deshpande
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Mar-02-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom47; (1934)36BOMLR1055; 155Ind.Cas.763
the high court was not precluded from considering in second appeal 7 the question whether the sanadi inam lands were kadim
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShripad Shivram Sardeshpande Vs. Shivram Bhikaji Patki
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Jan-15-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom466; (1934)36BOMLR1052; 152Ind.Cas.1031
patent apparently on the ground that he had overlooked the plea as to title by adverse possession set up by the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMuncherji Cursetji Khambata Vs. Jessie Grant Khambata
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Apr-20-1934
Reported in : AIR1935Bom5; (1934)36BOMLR1021
..... implication under section 10 of the act a wife may present a petition for divorce upon the grounds among others that her husband has been ..... and the christian wife is for this reason given the right to petition for a divorce in such an event a mahomedan who married a ..... the non christian party to a mixed marriage had no right to petition for divorce under the act and therefore no right of divorce at .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKilachand Devchand and Co. Vs. Ajodhyaprasad Sukhanand
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-13-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom452; (1934)36BOMLR992
was refused by the trial court and also by the appeal court rankin c j in delivering judgment expressly refrained from
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTKodoomal Jethanand Wadhwa Vs. Hiranand Vishindas
Court : Mumbai
Decided on : Feb-27-1934
Reported in : AIR1934Bom450; (1934)36BOMLR987
mirza j 1 this is a notice of motion taken out on behalf of defendant no 2 applying for an...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT