Representative - Year 1936 - Judgments

Oct 05 1936 (PC)

The Rajah of Vizianagaram Vs. the Secretary of State for India in Coun ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Oct-05-1936

Reported in: (1936)71MLJ873

..... would be idle to pretend that the servant of the court of wards can effectively represent the petitioner or adequately safeguard his interests in my opinion therefore there is no substance ..... that the contention that this application is not maintainable without the manager or other officer representing the rajah can be met successfully with a construction of section 50 which probably least .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 12 1936 (PC)

Chinnammal Vs. Chidambara Kothanar (Since Alleged to Have Become Insan ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Mar-12-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Mad626; 165Ind.Cas.481; (1936)71MLJ506

..... we may observe did neither appear in court nor was he represented 3 the question argued in the appeal is whether the plaintiff ..... the costs awarded to her by the decree ii a further sum representing certain other costs which she was entitled to recover by way ..... later order of the judicial committee in the same suit an amount representing costs was payable by him the appellant to his opponent when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 25 1936 (PC)

Shanmukam Alias Muthukaruppan, Minor Represented by His Guardian Shanm ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Sep-25-1936

Reported in: (1937)1MLJ278

..... of execution as assets descending to his undivided sons as legal representatives likewise under the insolvency acts courts in india have held ..... of father and son the other arises out of a representative character whether de jure or de facto where the transferor ..... have passed for the discharge of antecedent debts because it represents the amount disbursed to the creditors referred to in some of .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 08 1936 (PC)

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Apr-08-1936

Reported in: AIR1936Mad923; 166Ind.Cas.200; (1936)71MLJ268

..... work from about 1913 4 the plaintiffs filed this suit as representatives of the ryots owning lands in the villages of thenkarai ..... channel which ultimately joins the varahanadi river defendants 2 to 25 represent the ryots of kilamangalam and other villages which are irrigated by ..... river is entered as the source of irrigation for the villages represented by defendants 2 to 25 5 the substantial point in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 17 1936 (PC)

The Secretary of State for India in Council Represented by the Collect ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Dec-17-1936

Reported in: AIR1937Mad548; (1937)1MLJ732

..... this letters patent appeal was posted before a bench of three judges as it was represented on behalf of the government that the decision in kanniappa mudaliar v secretary of state ..... the government pleader and we are indebted to mr nambiar who had kindly agreed to represent the other side as amicus curiae it is not disputed that the case is directly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 25 1936 (PC)