Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... of the code. shri katare submits that along with the return, the respondents have filed the document dated 9.7.2014 (annexure r/1), whereby petitioner's representation dated 5.7.2014 is rejected. this runs contrary to section 126(3) of the act. 6. lastly, it is urged that the petitioner has a right ..... in the office of the respondents. his signatures were obtained and copy of supplementary bill (annexure p/1) was furnished to him. thereafter, the petitioner submitted representation (annexure p/8) for furnishing copy of mr report, annual report and documents on which signatures of manager of petitioner company were obtained. thereafter, the petitioner ..... submitted another detailed representation dated 5.7.2014 stating that the whole action is based on malafide and ulterior motive to harm the petitioner. 5. shri katare further submits that .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... or group of individuals is made to maintain the aforesaid contempt petition in context whereof order passed by principal seat and annexed in the contempt petition. moreover, not a single representation appears to have been filed for ventilating of any grievance, before the appropriate authority, as such, the proceedings instituted is based on skeleton petition. even otherwise, it is explicit after ..... of the guidelines issued by the election commission in para 8 of the order and based thereupon has disposed of the writ petition by directing petitioner therein to make a representation to state election commission in the context of municipal and panchayat elections for redressal of his grievances. on record the respondents have also referred the guidelines issued by the election .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR. WRIT PETITION NO.9860/2012(S) Madhya Pradesh Vidyut Mandal Abhiyanta Sangh & otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.11083/2012(S) Devendra Kumar Tiwari -Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12298/2012(S) Arvind Kumar Upadhyay and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.WRIT PETITION NO.12302/2012(S) J.P.Soni and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.And. WRIT PETITION NO.22145/2012(S) Deepak Kumar Shrivastava and otheRs.-Versus- State of M.P.& otheRs.PRESENT : Honble Shri Justice K.K.Trivedi. 2 Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respondents No.2 and 3. Shri B.L.Nag, learned counsel for the interveners......[in W.P.No.9860/2012(S)].Shri Manot Sharma, learned counsel for the petitioneRs.Shri Rahul Jain, learned Govt. Advocate for respondent No.1. Shri Anoop Nair, learned counsel for respond...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... as they relate to the grievance of the petitioners regarding non-payment of arrears, are disposed of with a direction to the effect that in case the petitioners file a representation before the respondent/authorities giving details of the arrears alongwith a copy of the order passed by this court and a copy of petition within three weeks of obtaining the .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... other hand, the learned counsel for the respondent no.1 has submitted that the contention of the learned counsel for the applicants was dependent upon the provisions of the representation of the peoples act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as rp act .), whereas the provisions relating to election are different in the rp act and the act of 1956, and therefore the law .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... not a case of the petitioner that it was not aware of earlier revenue proceedings in respect of fixation of lease and renewal of lease or there was any fraudulent representation made to it, therefore it is bound by its accepted status of a lessee by its deeds and the same operates an conclusive bar and the plea of non-est .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
1 AFR HIGH COURT OF MADHYA PRADESH PRINCIPAL SEAT AT JABALPUR DIVISON BENCH WRIT PETITION No.2597/2013 Tanzeel Khan, aged about 24 yeaRs.s/o Mohd. Idrees, r/o House No.215, Behind Ravinder College, Panchsheel Nagar, Bhopal, M.P.Versus 1. The State of Madhya Pradesh, Through Secretary, Home Department, Vallabh Bhawan, Bhopal, M.P.2. Collector, Bhopal, M.P.3. Superintendent of Police, Bhopal, M.P.4. Town Inspector, T.T.Nagar, Bhopal, M.P.----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For the petitioner: Shri A.K.Pare, Adocate. For the State: Shri Umesh Pandey, Government Advocate. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- PRESENT: HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE RAKESH SAKSENA HONOURABLE SHRI JUSTICE M.A.SIDDIQUI ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Date of hearing:...
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... law laid down by hon'ble supreme court, in the absence of suspension/stay of conviction, the applicant will suffer a disqualification as envisaged under section 8(3) of the representation of people act, 1951. if the applicant is disqualified, he would suffer irreparable loss. his entire political career is on stake. thus, it would be equitable and in the interest of ..... bail by this court vide order dated 1.2.2010. the applicant is an ex-mla. he was a dedicated public servant and he has served the assembly and the people of assembly with utmost dedication to his duty. he has also filed public interest litigations in constitutional courts with a view to subserve public good. the applicant has a very .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... election, in so far no as it concerns the respondent no.1 was materially affected due to non- compliance with the provisions of the constitution or of the representation of the people act, 1951 or if any rules or orders made under the act ?. 5 whether the election of the respondent no no.1 to the constituency deserves to be ..... no.68 (for short the constituency ) has been called in question on the grounds mentioned in sub-clauses (iii) and (iv) of section 100(1)(d) of the representation of people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act ). act. the petitioner has further sought 2 election petition no.9/2009 (i) an order for re-inspection/re-count of ..... said to have been disseminated through website or television or radio. as further averred by him, even if it is assumed that the petitioner was precluded from making representation in view of a wrong declaration of result on the website or on the television, he was required to offer an explanation as to why the facts pertaining to .....
Tag this Judgment!Court : Madhya Pradesh
..... not roc-g/391-394/sta dated 05-04-2013 and as per the said report, no complaints have been received against any of the petitioner companies including any complaint/representation against the scheme of arrangements and amalgamation of the petitioner companies. (e) that, the deponent further submits that, there appears no other objection, to the proposed scheme of arrangement and .....
Tag this Judgment!