Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 19 definition Sorted by: recent Court: madhya pradesh Page 1 of about 47 results (0.101 seconds)

Nirbhayadas Gangaram Vs. Rameshwar Agnibhoj

Court : Madhya Pradesh

Reported in : AIR1960MP115; 1960CriLJ484

..... in all essential matters to proceedings in civil courts.'we have, therefore, no hesitation in holding that an election tribunal is a court.6. section 116a of the representation of the people act (xliii of 1951) provides for an appeal to the high court from an order made by an election tribunal. the election tribunal is therefore, a court subordinate ..... at an election held on 11-3-1957. the petitioner has filed an election petition (annexure-b) before the election commission of india under the provisions of the representation of the people act, 1951 for an order declaring the election of salt, gulab bai as well as of the other candidate shri laxnian rao naysk as void.the petition was ..... election petition. all that the non-applicant stated therein was that he and his daughter should not be called as katias. the reference to the words 'i and my people' and 'our caste' in para 10 of the notice when read in the context of the statements made in the earlier portion thereof can only mean the non- .....

Dharmendra Singh Tiwari Vs. Dr. Rajendra Kumar Singh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... statement including name of person, time and place where election agent has committed such corrupt practice. thus, there is no non-compliance of section 81 or 82 of the representation of the people act, 1951 therefore, in my opinion, petition cannot be dismissed as threshold under section order vii rule 11 of c.p.c. read with section 86 of the r ..... has been filed by respondent no. 1 under order vii rule 11 of the code of civil procedure (hereinafter referred to as cpc ) read with section 86 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereafter referred to as the r.p.act ), inter-alia on the ground that the petitioner has called in question, the election of respondent no.1 from .....

Prahlad Singh Raghuvanshi Vs. State of M.P. and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... occurring in article 329 of the constitution of india has been held to mean and include the entire process from the issue of the notification under section 14 of the representation of people act, 1951 to the declaration of result under section 66 of the said act. 12. true, it is that power of judicial review is part of a basic structure .....

Narayan Singh Lodhi Vs. Amar Singh Rajput and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... the purposes of these rules :- (i) bribery as defined and explained in clause (1) of section 123 the representation of the people act, 1951 (no.43 of 1951). (ii) undue influence as defined in clause (2) of section 123 of the representation of the people act, 1951. (iii) the systematic appeal by a candidate or his agent or by any other person with the .....

Sangeeta Bansal Vs. State of Madhya Pradesh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... to the filling in the seats in the municipality, making of territorial constituencies in the name of wards within the municipal area and the law for representation in a municipality but nominated members are not authorized to cast a vote in the meeting of the municipality. the other special power provided to the ..... . (2) the legislature of a state may, by law, provide-- (a) for the representation in a municipality of-- (i) persons having special knowledge or experience in municipal administration; (ii) the members of the house of the people and the members of the legislative assembly of the state representing constituencies which comprise wholly or partly ..... person residing within the municipal area and being otherwise not ineligible for election as a councillor may be nominated; (d) members of the house of the people and the members of the legislative assembly of the state representing constituencies which comprise wholly or partly the municipal area; (e) members of the council of state .....

Arjun Kakodiya Vs. Kamal Marskole and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

1. the petitioner has preferred this election petition under section 80 read with section 81 of representation of people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1951) calling in question the election of respondent no.1 as a member of legislative assembly of the state ..... chief election officer, new delhi through sub divisional magistrate, barghat, district seoni on 9.12.2013 but same has yet not been decided. petitioner further filed a detailed representation to the district election officer through returning officer on 10.12.2013. after counting of votes there was a dispute in relation to number of postal ballots and its polling ..... objection at proper stage. it is further pleaded that petitioner was polled the highest number of votes in counting of votes through electronic voting machine and as per newspaper peoples samaachar news, jabalpur dated 9.12.2013 petitioner was declared as winning candidate by 728 votes. on the basis of aforesaid pleadings and grounds, prayer has been made .....

Dr. Rajendra Singh Yadav Vs. Union of India and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... "public interest litigation" in its report of public interest law, usa, 1976 as follows: "10. ... public interest law is the name that has recently been given to efforts providing legal representation to previously unrepresented groups and interests. such efforts have been undertaken in the recognition that ordinary marketplace for legal services fails to provide such services to significant segments of the ..... (p) ltd. v. prem chandra mishra (2007) 14 scc 281 : air 2008 sc 913, scc p.288, para 10 : air p.918, para 19.) (emphasis supplied) 28. this court in people's union for democratic rights v. union of india (1982) 3 scc 235 : 1982 scc (lands) 275, defined "public interest litigation" and observed that (scc p.242, para 2) the .....

Lakhan Ghanghoriya Vs. Anchal Sonker and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... the application and submitted that the pleadings of paragraphs 9, 10, 11, 12 of the election petition have been made in strict compliance of the provisions of the representation of people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act of 1951) and are duly covered under the grounds enumerated under section 100 of the act of 1951. so ..... constituency no. 97. it is further pleaded that their names found place in the previous voters list of assembly elections held in the year 2008. the petitioner made representation before the election officer for addition of the names of the aforesaid voters in the voters list, but the same was not considered, then the petitioner filed w. ..... concerned, they also pertain to non- compliance of section 130 of the act of 1951. it is specifically pleaded against respondent nos. 2 and 3 that despite representation made by the petitioner, they have not complied with the provisions of section 130 of the act of 1951 and this pleading is covered under section section 100(i .....

M/s. G.D. Oil and Floor Mill Vs. Madhya Pradesh Madhya Kshetra Vidyut ...

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... , reliance on section 26 of 1910 act and section 126 of 2003 act is misconceived. apart from this, under section 135, there is no scope of preferring representation to respondents. hence, decision on any such representation by annexure r/11 dated 9.7.2011 is of no consequence. more so, when validity of this rejection is not called in question. 19. the .....

Sharadendu Tiwari Vs. Ajay Arjun Singh and Others

Court : Madhya Pradesh

..... the petition or same is otherwise an abuse of the process of the court. 14. as far as exemption provided under the explanation of section 77 of representation of people act on the ground that respondent no.1 was star campaigner of his political party is concerned, since it is pleaded on behalf of the petitioner that ..... is granted and those expenses ought to have been included as election expenditure. it is further pleaded that eligibility of certain exemption under section 77 of the representation of people act, 1951 is a subject matter of trial and it is only trial court which can give any final adjudication upon the aforesaid subject. as far as ..... the election petition are crucial part of pleading, disclosing cause of action in respect of corrupt practices under section 77(3) read with section 123(6) of the representation of people act, 1951. in these circumstances, the aforesaid pleadings cannot be struck off as frivolous. it is further replied that in paragraphs 14, 15 to 17 and .....