Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 146c protection of action taken in good faith Sorted by: recent Court: kerala Page 2 of about 17 results (0.443 seconds)

Jan 25 2016 (HC)

A. Shanmughan and Another Vs. Vandazhy Grama Panchayat, represented by ...

Court : Kerala

..... that the 8th respondent has now started construction of the m sand unit without any permission/noc/consent or licence from any competent authorities. they have submitted a representation to the district collector and since no action has been taken in the matter, this writ petition is filed. 7. it is inter alia contended that the board ..... him and it can be objected only on sufficient and reasonable grounds. right to carry on business cannot be objected merely for the reason that certain group of people had objected to the same. it will amount to violation of the fundamental right of any citizen to carry on the business activities. reasonable restrictions have already been ..... an order passed by the panchayat on 18/8/2014 refusing to grant permission to put up the industrial unit on the ground that there is objection from the people in the locality. writ petitioner contended that when the board had already taken a decision in the matter, panchayat cannot refuse to grant permission. in this case, .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 15 2016 (HC)

P.P. Govindan Vs. The Joint Registrar of Co-Op. Societies (General) an ...

Court : Kerala

..... . it is trite to observe that what cannot be achieved directly cannot be, equally, achieved indirectly either. 28. further woeful is the situation going by exhibit p2 representation of none other than the secretary of the society. he complains that the third respondent has taken away all the records and kept them in his house. the secretary ..... to oversee the administrative affairs of the respondent bank. as a result, he supposedly exercised his powers under section 33 of the act. 24. among the thousands of people, members and strangers included, the first respondent has handpicked only those persons who initially were not interested in being the members of the managing committee: those members who ..... 1. co-operative societies are supposed to showcase the spirit of co-operation among the people, even at the grassroots, to come together and organize themselves for mutual benefit or the common good. unfortunately, they have become miniature training grounds for deception, simulation .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 23 2015 (HC)

A.M. Abdul Naser Vs. Kerala State Election Commission and Others

Court : Kerala

..... governed by section 29(2) of the limitation act. in our opinion however the limitation act cannot apply to proceedings like an election petition in as much as the representation of the people act in a complete and self contained code which does not admit of the introduction of the principles or the provisions of law contained in the indian limitation act .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 16 2015 (HC)

Manakunnam Village Padasekhara Samrakshana Samithi, Kandanad, Rep. by ...

Court : Kerala

..... immediate enquiry and interference and appropriate action against all concerned. allegedly since nothing transpired, the petitioner moved the hon'ble chief minister of kerala by filing ext. p8 representation on 28.08.2006. 6. in the meanwhile, the 8th respondent company herein (lakshmi paper industries limited) came to be aggrieved of two orders dated 23.11. ..... from any corner and that the objection arose only when the respondent company sought to set up an eco-friendly resort in the property. it is stated that people in the locality had even taken law into their hands, which necessitated filing of w.p.(c) nos. 880 and 893 of 2007, leading to ext. r8 ..... owners way back from 1997 onwards, by filing o.p.20484 of 1997 (when such attempt was made by st. mary's properties ltd and others). various representations and proceedings were being filed against all the concerned wrongdoers before the departmental authorities /state and also before this court at different points of time. the properties .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 03 2015 (HC)

State of Kerala, Represented By the Principal Secretary to Government ...

Court : Kerala

..... complaints, the government have directed the committee to consider these matters as well, and the committee minutely examined this issue. the representations/complaints received from the people residing in cheruvannur, nallalam, beppur, elathoor etc. which were added to the corporation, praying that those areas may be bifurcated ..... nearby thalakulathoor grama panchayat, which will give a planned and balanced development of the areas, and better services to the people. on an examination of the representation submitted, demanding constitution of a new municipality with headquarters at kazhakootam, from out of the thiruvananthapuram corporation, it is reckoned ..... that constitution of 3 new municipalities in kozhikode district and one municipality at thiruvananthapuram was a long standing public demand. there were various representations received from the general public. government constituted a committee comprising of the director of urban affairs, state performance audit officer, chief town .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 20 2015 (HC)

State of Kerala, represented by The Secretary to Forest and Wildlife D ...

Court : Kerala

..... appropriate authorities and then take a decision on the matter finally. the petitioner and the additional respondents or their authorised representative(s) are directed to file a representation before the district collector within a period of one month and the district collector shall, after convening the meeting as directed hereinabove and after hearing the petitioner and ..... the ground water act have a duty to examine whether petitioner is using excessive ground water so as to deplete the water source affecting the people who are living in the panchayat area. panchayat as well as the authorities functioning under the ground water act are equally concerned with the welfare of the ..... people who are residing in the panchayat area, a matter which can always be taken up by the panchayat before the authorities functioning under the ground water .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 19 2015 (HC)

United Spirits Ltd., represented by its General, K. Jagadishwarlu Vs. ...

Court : Kerala

..... retroactive revision of the pay. clarification: 20. contending that the overtime allowance could not be treated as part of the regular pay, the petitioner submitted exhibit p4 representation before the commissioner of excise, who, then, through exhibit p5 rejected the petitioner's interpretation of exhibit p1. this court is, therefore, called upon to ..... from the third respondent to pay the overtime allowance at an enhanced rate, apparently, in tune with exhibit p1 revised pay, the petitioner submitted exhibit p4 representation before the second respondent, the commissioner of excise. 5. in response, the second respondent communicated through exhibit p5 that in terms of rule 128 of the ..... in this development of meaning. from pax, meaning peace and also a settlement of hostilities, was derived the word pacare, to impose a settlement on peoples or territories. in late latin pacare was extended in sense to mean to appease. the old french word paiier that developed from latin pacare came to .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 03 2015 (HC)

Lalitha Muralidharan Vs. The Commissioner of Commercial Taxes and Othe ...

Court : Kerala

..... , the petitioner was permitted to approach the 2nd respondent with an application for exemption from tax on the sales effected to her. she accordingly preferred ext.p18 representation before the 2nd respondent. the said representation was, however, rejected by ext.p19 communication informing the petitioner that no exemption was available. the petitioner, therefore, withdrew w.p.(c).no.9096/2015 without prejudice .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 02 2015 (HC)

Nirmala Thomas, Retired Manager (Finance and Accounts), Kerala State C ...

Court : Kerala

..... .5,24,260/- as gratuity, but he was paid only rs. 3,50,000/-. 2. aggrieved at the reduced amount of gratuity paid to him, the petitioner submitted exhibit p1 representation to the joint registrar, who disposed it of through exhibit p2 order of rejection. further aggrieved, the petitioner filed exhibit p3 appeal before the government, which also dismissed, through exhibit .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 30 2015 (HC)

Sajeev Vs. The State of Kerala, represented by The C.I. of Police, Per ...

Court : Kerala

..... a criminal case to be defended by a pleader of his choice. therefore, in view of article 22(2) it has become obligatory on the state to make provision for representation of the accused through a legal practitioner of his choice and that has become fructified when section 303 was brought within the ambit of cr.p.c. 24. section 303 ..... as to give effect to the constitutionally recognized right of an accused to consult and defend through a counsel of his choice. 21. the preamble to the constitution states that people of india have given the constitution to themselves to secure to all its citizens justice, social, economic and political, liberty of thought, expression, belief, faith and worship, equality of status .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //