Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 146c protection of action taken in good faith Sorted by: recent Page 1 of about 610 results (0.367 seconds)

May 13 2013 (HC)

Present: Mr. Padamkant Dwivedi Advocate Vs. State of Punjab and Others

Court : Punjab and Haryana

..... , issued instructions and as per instruction no.16, disciplinary action can be initiated against officials appointed on election duty under section 13 cc of the representation of the people act, 1950 and section 28a of representation of the people act, 1951. these instructions cover all officers/staff and police personnel deputed to perform election duties during the election and, thus, the election commission has .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 13 2012 (HC)

M/S. Jaiprakash Associates Limited and Another Vs. State of Himachal P ...

Court : Himachal Pradesh

..... k.prabhakaran versus p.jayarajan, (2005) 1 scc 754. in k.prabhakaran (supra), question was whether in reference to representation of peoples act, 1951, the word any offence mentioned in section 8(3) of the representation of peoples act, 1951 should mean a single offence or the word any shall include all offences. the honble ..... on the fulfillment of commitments of government of himachal pradesh as made by it in the said policy; (paragraph-49) 9. the petitioner had made a representation to the principal secretary, excise and taxation, government of himachal pradesh, shimla requesting for issuance of notification in consonance to clause-19.1 of rules 2004. ..... the hill areas will sadly reflect their credibility and people will not take the word of the government. that will shake the faith of the people in the governance. therefore, in order to keep the faith and maintain good governance it is necessary that whatever representation is made by the government or its instrumentality which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 16 2024 (HC)

Buoyant Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd Vs. M/s Manyata Reallty

Court : Karnataka

..... high court was competent to frame rule for making provision for receiving the election petitions presented to the high court under section 81 of the representation of the people act. it is in that context that the supreme court elucidated the difference between ministerial act and adjudicatory act. it was observed, by ..... in the elections held to the badarpur legislative assembly constituency of assam. the contesting respondent filed an election petition under sections 80/81 of the representation of the people act, to challenge the election of the appellant. the election petition was presented before the stamp reporter-cum-oath commissioner of the high court ..... address the controversy involved in this case. it was in the - 28 - context of presentation of election petition under section 81 of the representation of the people act, 1951 that the supreme court discussed the difference between the ministerial function and adjudicatory function and further that by which authority and at which .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 03 2024 (SC)

Sukanya Shantha Vs. Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... : a) to ensure that legal aid lawyers have been appointed to represent all undertrials. in circumstances where any prisoner is found without legal representation during the visit by the dlsa, immediate steps to be taken towards ensuring appointment. b) to verify whether panel lawyers are meeting and interacting ..... societal hierarchies. by assigning specific types of work to marginalized castes based on their supposed "customary" roles, the manuals perpetuate the stereotype that people from these communities are either incapable of or unfit for more skilled, dignified, or intellectual work. 174 the manuals/rules also reinforce stereotypes against ..... individual .34 the court also acknowledged that throughout history, socio-cultural revolts, anti-discrimination assertions, movements, literature and leaders have worked at socializing people away from supremacist thought and towards an egalitarian existence. 35 in that backdrop, the indian constitution was an attempt to reverse the socializing of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 24 2024 (HC)

Shri Siddaramaiah Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... / (cid:29) (cid:31) ?.@ st (cid:5) 6 7 st (cid:15)v aap [ z ) .0 . sd/- parvathi 75 it is interesting to notice the representation. the representation indicates few factors. they are, the muda had formed the layout and distributed the sites in the year 2001 itself. if the wife of the petitioner was aware that muda ..... what is further shocking is the brother-in-law of the petitioner applies for conversion before the deputy commissioner. the deputy commissioner directs spot inspection and report. two people are said to have inspected the property and given a report that agricultural status of the land still subsists. 7.2. he would submit that in the ..... that the petitioner has been benefited out of any transaction nor the wife of the petitioner was the sole applicant for grant of compensatory sites. there are 120 people whose lands were taken over by the mysore urban development authority ( muda for short), notwithstanding the lands have either been notified or de-notified or without notification .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (HC)

Sri Suresha Vs. The State Of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... residence, language, etc., and doing acts prejudicial to maintenance of harmony. (1) whoever (a) by words, either spoken or written, or by signs or by visible representations or otherwise, promotes or attempts to promote, on grounds of religion, race, place of birth, residence, language, caste or community or any other ground whatsoever, disharmony or ..... upon careful perusal of the offending news article, reproduced (supra), it is crystal clear that there is no reference to any group or groups of people in the said article. the publication focuses totally on the complainant imputing that he had encroached upon public land where the foundation stone laying ceremony was proposed ..... supra only refer to the complainant, imputing that his activities are prejudicial to the hills. these words have no connection whatsoever with a group or groups of people or communities. hence, the foundational facts essential to constitute the offence - 19 - nc:2024. khc:38865 crl.p no.5694 of 2024 under section .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 20 2024 (SC)

M/s Ultra Tech Cement Limited Vs. Mast Ram

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... . state of maharashtra & ors., 2024 scc online sc2547wherein it has been held that once the compensation has been 32 determined, the same is payable immediately without any requirement of a representation or request by the landowners and a duty is cast on the state to pay such compensation to the land losers, otherwise there would be a breach of article 300 .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 13 2024 (SC)

Kimneo Haokip Hangshing Vs. Kenn Raikhan

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... corrupt practices in the election. the appellant filed an application under order vii rule 11 of the code of civil procedure, 1908 ( cpc ) read with section 86 of the representation of the people act, 1951 ( rpa ) for rejection of the petition, which was dismissed. the application dismissed by the high court on 05.07.2023 is presently under challenge before this court .....

Tag this Judgment!

Sep 12 2024 (SC)

Jaseela Shaji Vs. The Union Of India

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... the detenu/the husband of the petitioner. however, after receipt of this petition, the office of the jail authorities was contacted. the jail authorities informed that three representations dated 27.09.2023 addressed to the joint secretary (cofeposa), director general, ceib and the chairman, cofeposa advisory board were submitted by the detenu/the husband of ..... of suresh forex at kottayam, native of parur shambu, simon from kottayam, etc.; that you have also given currencies to people going abroad 27 from kerala; that mainly you sell currency to khader from chennai; that the currency collected from kerala will be sent to chennai via madhurai ..... .e. you were recorded on 11.0.7.2023 wherein you, inter-alia, stated that you buy foreign currencies from foreign currency dealers and buy from people who are nri's in kerala when they come home; that these are done without any documents; that you mainly purchase foreign currency from traders like suresh .....

Tag this Judgment!

Aug 29 2024 (SC)

A.b. Govardhan Vs. P. Ragothaman

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... by a defendant bereft of evidentiary material to back up such averment/statement takes such defendant s case nowhere. while deciding a statutory appeal under section 116a of the representation of the people act, 1951 against an order of the gauhati high court rejecting an election petition, this court in kalyan kumar gogoi v ashutosh agnihotri, (2011) 2 scc532commented that the term .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //