Skip to content


Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 139 repealed Sorted by: old Page 25 of about 313 results (0.112 seconds)

Oct 14 1935 (PC)

The Secretary of State for India in Council Vs. Srimutty Parijat Debi

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR125

..... the share of tirthapati mukherjee in the residuary estate, may come up to rs. 25,00,000. the administrator general was of opinion that the petitioner should take out representation at least for such securities. (iii) that upon a construction of the will of pashupati mukherjee it might be held that the residuary estate is not distributable until ..... the share of tirthapati to his mother for three reasons, which were as follows :-(i) the administrator general was of the opinion that until the applicant took out representation of the estate of tirthapati mukherjee she could not claim the estate to be made over to her and she could not give the administrator general a proper and ..... final distribution of the estate as to this honourable court may seem fit.the summons was supported by a petition of parijat debi in which she submitted that no representation was necessary to the estate of her deceased son and that she was entitled to the said ten annas share in the residuary estate in the hands of .....

Tag this Judgment!

Oct 14 1935 (PC)

Secy. of State and Another Vs. Srimutty Parijat Debi and Another

Court : Privy Council

..... the share of tirthapati mukherjee in the residuary estate, may come up to rupees 25,00,000. the administrator-general was of opinion that the petitioner should take out representation at least for such securities. (iii) that upon a construction of the will of pashupati mukherjee it might be held that the residuary estate is not distributable until ..... share of tirthapati to his mother for three reasons, which were as follows : (i) the administrator-general was of the opinion that until the applicant took out representation of the estate of tirthapati mukherjee she could not claim the estate to be made over to her and she could not give the administrator-general a proper and legal ..... distribution of the estate as to this honourable court may seem fit. the summons was supported by a petition of parijat debi in which she submitted that no representation was necessary to the estate of her deceased son and that she was entitled to the said ten annas share in the residuary estate in the hands of the .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1935 (PC)

Tyagaraja Mudaliyar Vs. Vedathanni

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1936)38BOMLR373

..... three days after her husband's death, she refused to sign it, and was only induced to do so two days later by representations that it would not be acted on, and was only intended to provide evidence of the undivided status of the family. it was held by both courts on these facts ..... been in her possession and that no effect was given to the provision for her maintenance. a year after her husband's death she went to live with her own people and has since been maintained by them. somasundara died on january 17, 1925; and his junior widow, defendant no. 2, executed the ante-adoption deed in which provision was made ..... was between rs. 2,000 and rs. 2,500, only rs. 200 a month; and, as regards the house in bazaar street, tiruvarur, the plaintiff stated in her evidence that people of her status and condition of life ' could not live there at all.7. there are concurrent findings of the courts below that when this document was presented to her .....

Tag this Judgment!

Dec 06 1935 (PC)

Tyagaraja Mudaliyar and Another Vs. Vedathanni

Court : Privy Council

..... days after her husband's death, she refused to sign it, and was only induced to do so two days later by representations that it would not be acted on, and was only intended to provide evidence of the undivided status of the family. it was held by both courts on these facts ..... been in her possession and that no effect was given to the provision for her maintenance. a year after her husband's death she went to live with her own people and has since been maintained by them. somasundara died on 17th january 1925; and his junior widow, defendant 2, executed the ante-adoption deed in which provision was made for ..... was between rs. 2,000 and rs. 2,500, only rs. 200 a month; and, as regards the house in bazaar street, tiruvarur, the plaintiff stated in her evidence that people of her status and condition of life could not live there at all. there are concurrent findings of the courts below that when this document was presented to her three .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jan 20 1936 (PC)

M.L.C. Gupta Vs. Emperor

Court : Allahabad

Reported in : AIR1936All314; 162Ind.Cas.507

..... intention of the writer to promote hatred, etc., must be established. the section merely says:whoever by words, either spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representations, or otherwise, promotes, or attempts to promote feelings of enmity or hatred, etc.7. it does not say 'intentionally promotes feelings of enmity, etc.' the language of ..... stands in clear contrast to that of section 499 where it is provided that:whoever by words either spoken or intended to be read, or by signs or visible representations, makes or publishes any imputation concerning any person intending to harm, etc.8. it would, therefore seem to follow that the legislature contemplates that the words spoken ..... the author of a book goes beyond this and generalises his remarks so as to make them apply to the entire community, and characterises them as low class people and belonging to the criminal classes who are guilty of offences and immoral acts, the book ceases to be a purely historical one and is bound to promote .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1936 (PC)

In Re: Jonnalagadda Ramalingayya and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1936)71MLJ357

..... sub-section (1) of section 4 of the act as amended, they come within the definition of 'news-sheet', that is to say, words, signs or visible representations which have the tendency to which we have already referred. one other sub-section must be referred to and that is sub-section (10) to section 2, which defines ..... of imprisonment. karunakara thought 'this is all due to effect of wealth'. the following words by lakshmi are worthy of remark:everyone bearing false titles, deceiving the people outwardly pretending to be working against the government and giving lectures but secretly with the support of the government, robbing the wealth, chastity and the lives of ..... mill-owner and find lakshmi wrongfully confined there because he is poor, karunakara can prove nothing.the millowner on account of his riches did as he pleased and people respected him. if the poor want to substantiate, wealth eclipsed justice, nobody dare put up a case against the sait.12. the enquiry however commenced against him .....

Tag this Judgment!

Apr 29 1936 (PC)

Jonnalagadda Ramalingayya and ors. Vs. Emperor

Court : Chennai

Reported in : AIR1936Mad835; 165Ind.Cas.860

..... sub-section (1), section 4 of the act as amended, they come within the definition of 'news-sheet,' that is to say, words, signs or visible representations which have the tendency to which we have already referred. one other sub-section must be referred to and that is sub-section (10), section 2, which defines ..... of imprisonment. karunakara thought 'this is all due to effect of wealth.' the following words by lakshmi are worthy of remark.:everyone bearing false titles, deceiving the people outwardly, pretending to be working against the government and giving lectures but secretly with the support of the government, robbing the wealth, chastity and the lives of ..... the millowner and find lakshmi wrongfully confined there. because he is poor, karunakara can prove nothing:the millowner on account of his riches did as he pleased and people respected him. if the poor want to substantiate, wealth eclipsed justice. nobody dare put up a case against the sait.8. the enquiry, however, commenced against .....

Tag this Judgment!

Jun 24 1936 (PC)

Superintendent and Remembrancer of Legal Affairs Vs. Akhil Bandu Guha ...

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : AIR1936Cal680,166Ind.Cas.163

..... , in fact it must not be, a mere inventory. it is supposed to be, to use an expression employed in one judgment, a pictorial representation of the trading position of the company, easily appreciated not by ignorant people but by persons who are reasonably able to understand commercial expressions and commercial conditions. there is a well known observation of that great judge ..... my mind, is a striking case of non-disclosure, amounting to a suppression of the truth. i further regret very much to say that there was every inducement for the people who drew up this balance sheet to make it up, in this irregular fashion. it was certainly an improper thing for the directors of the dhakeswari cotton mills to advance .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 06 1936 (PC)

Boodapati Ankamma, Wrongly Described as Nannuru Ankamma in the Decree ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1937)1MLJ192

..... mentioned to him till he actually found himself in the house in the neighbouring village that evening, that he was decoyed to that village by d.w. 1 on a representation that he was merely going in search of a lost cow, that when he found himself in that house in the evening he was surrounded by ..... ready there beforehand, that it was only then that he was asked to go through a marriage form to which he objected, that he was compelled by some of the people assembled there to sit on the plank, that his hand was seized by d.w. 1 and made to tie the thali round the defendant's neck. he denies that .....

Tag this Judgment!

Nov 09 1936 (PC)

Vithalrao Chidambarrao Heblikar Vs. Baswant Bisto Nadgir

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : AIR1937Bom433; (1937)39BOMLR576

..... the present suit will not be complete unless reference is made to the enquiry under act iii of 1874. it appears that various interlocutory orders were passed upon the representation of the nadgirs and after hearing the jahagirdars. the final result of that enquiry which was accepted by government was that the nadgir family were the representative watandars, ..... watandars to create a trust as of the jahagirdars to accept the same.17. the earliest document which militates against the creation of a fiduciary relationship is the representation of the nadgirs to government in the year 1843-vide exhibit 155. in that petition the nadgirs have complained of the obstruction of the jahagirdars to the cultivation ..... the watan formerly of their own free will and now they say that we take the watan by force arid thus they lower us in the eyes of the people.19. the implication of the above is obvious. the utmost that can be said in favour of the nadgirs is that their watan lands were not confiscated and .....

Tag this Judgment!


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //