Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 139 repealed Sorted by: old Page 13 of about 313 results (0.266 seconds)

Abdul Sawan Sheikh and ors. Vs. Nekbar Mandal

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : 16Ind.Cas.632

..... obviously not open to the decree-holder subsequently to turn round and contend that what had been sold is the interest of an under-raiyat. he is bound by his representation and cannot be permitted to resile from his statement, to the detriment of the purchaser. in the case before us, if the plaintiff were allowed to succeed on the ground .....

Subramaniam Chetti and ors. Vs. Doraisinga Tevar and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1913)24MLJ49

..... v. rangasawmy nainar : (1912)23mlj301 where the learned judge expressed an opinion that an attestation, having regard to the habits of the people of this country, by a person who is interested may amount to representation. but i think the application of that rule must depend upon the facts found in each case. it cannot be said that it ..... plaintiff really took little or no part in the negotiations and was probably not the person really interested. apart from that, i take it that the evidence of representation which can be relied on at all is only the attestation of the document by the 1st plaintiff. at the time the 1st plaintiff attested the document, he ..... passed it on to her, and, consequently, he is now estopped from endeavouring to recover that property from the possession of the 1st defendant. the only evidence of representation is the fact that he attested the document, and the allegation of the 1st defendant that the 1st plaintiff negotiated the sale. that allegation is one which i am .....

Heilbut, Symons and Co. Vs. Buckleton

Court : House of Lords

..... ought then to have entered judgment for the defendants notwithstanding the verdict. it will, of course, be evident that i have been dealing only with warranty or representation relating to a specific thing. this is wholly distinct from the question which arises when goods are sold by description and their answering to that description becomes a ..... company. at the trial the substantial case which was sought to be made on behalf of the plaintiff had reference solely to the alleged false and fraudulent representation. evidence was given by the plaintiff and not challenged by the defendants as to a conversation which took place over the telephone between the plaintiff and mr. ..... shares in liverpool. johnston, who had seen a draft prospectus in london but had at the time no copy of the prospectus, mentioned the company to several people in liverpool, including a mr. wright, who sometimes acted as broker for the respondent. on april 14 the respondent telephoned to johnston from wright's office. .....

Kesavasami Aiyar Vs. A.L.R.A.R.R.M. Narayana Chetty and anr.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : (1913)24MLJ228

..... the sale is not binding on the plaintiffs.4. the next question is one of estoppel. the facts found, set forth above show that the plaintiff has not made any representation by words or conduct to lead the zemindar to believe that narasimmier alone was his tenant and that the plaintiff had no interest in the property. his omission to give .....

In Re: Mahomed Ali

Court : Kolkata

Reported in : (1914)ILR41Cal466

..... been deposited as required by section 3 is used for the purpose of printing or publishing any newspaper, book or other document containing any words, signs or visible representations which are likely or may have a tendency, directly or indirectly, whether by inference, suggestion, allusion, metaphor, implication or otherwise--to bring into hatred or ..... necessary to a forfeiture in accordance with the terms of section 12. first, it must appear to the local government that the publication contains words, signs or visible representations of the nature described in section 4, sub-section (1), and, secondly, the local government must by notification in the local official gazette, stating the grounds ..... a stop to outrages that shock all feelings of humanity, if they in fact occurred.23. and so, it is contended this is an appeal to the people of a christian nation, just because they are a christian nation, and thus would be the first to protest against the cruel disregard of the principles of .....

Sturges and Burn Mfg. Co. Vs. Beauchamp

Court : US Supreme Court

..... , 219 u. s. 568 -569. it is urged that the plaintiff in error was not permitted to defend upon the ground that it acted in good faith relying upon the representation made by beauchamp that he was over sixteen. it is said that, being over fourteen, he at least had attained the age at which he should have been treated as ..... the age specified. the imposition of absolute requirements of this sort is a familiar exercise of the protective power of government. reg. v. prince, l.r. 2 c.c. 154; people v. werner, 174 n.y. 132; ulrich v. commonwealth, 6 bush, 400; state v. heck, 23 minn. 549; state v. hartfiel, 24 wis. 60; state v. tomasi, 67 page 231 .....

Emperor Vs. Anandrao Balkrishna Rangnekar

Court : Mumbai

Reported in : (1915)17BOMLR82

..... those allegations his action came under section 500 of the indian penal code, he answered that he had not exceeded the privilege given by law to aggrieved persons to make representions to superior officers. there is thus no question of the responsibility of the accused for the petition he presented, and there is no doubt that in that petition he ..... biswas had publicly addressed the following words to the plaintiff in the presence of several persons:- 'you are unchaste, you are a prostitute. i will publish before the caste people that you are a prostitute and stop invitations to you. i took you to the garden house at kalighut and had illicit intercourse with you.' the woman filed a suit ..... , the mamlatdar says that he acted as he did towards the accused ' with intent to make a deterrent example in a case.' he admits that there were other people in the village who were equally in default as the accused, but pleads that he selected the accused because his name was first in a list of about ten or .....

Mutual Film Corp. Vs. Industrial Comm'n of Ohio

Court : US Supreme Court

..... be regarded, nor intended to be regarded by the ohio constitution, we think, as part of the press of the country, or as organs of public opinion. they are mere representations of events, of ideas and sentiments published and known; vivid, useful, and entertaining, no doubt, but, as we have said, capable of evil, having power for it, the ..... the court cited the following cases: marmet v. state, 45 ohio st. 63, 72-73; baker v. cincinnati, 11 ohio st. 534; commonwealth v. mcgann, 213 mass. 213, 215; people v. steele, 231 ill. 340, 344-345. the exercise of the power upon moving picture exhibitions has been sustained. greenberg v. western turf. ass'n, 148 cal. 126; laurelle v ..... board of censors legislative power, page 236 u. s. 232 which is vested only in the general assembly of the state, subject to a referendum vote of the people, in that it gives to the board the power to determine the application of the statute without fixing any standard by which the board shall be guided in its determination .....

Sri Sri Bommadevera Sattynarayana Varaprasada Rao Naidu Bahadur Zamind ...

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 30Ind.Cas.178

..... liability for water rate and was benefited and (if so) to what extent?(ii) whether penal rate was levied from plaintiffs in consequence of any wrongful or negligent representation to the 1st defendant by the 2nd defendant or his servants and (if so) whether the 3rd defendant is bound to compensate the plaintiffs and to what extent?( ..... the 2nd defendant wrongfully represented to the 1st defendant that the lands from which water cess could he levied included the plaintiffs' lands: that by reason of such representation the plaintiffs were made to pay the water cess though the lands in their occupation wore not subject to the water cess: and that the said other lands ..... for water rate and was benefited and (if so) to what extent?2. whether penal water rate, was levied from plaintiffs in consequence of any wrongful or negligent representation to 1st defendant by and defendant or his servants, and (if so) whether 3rd defendant is hound to compensate plaintiffs and to what extent?3. to what reliefs .....

Paru Amma and ors. and Vs. Itticheri Amma and ors.

Court : Chennai

Reported in : 32Ind.Cas.459

..... under exhibit ia; inasmuch as the 1st defendant was the owner of the equity of redemption under exhibit 4 and as they bona fide paid full value believing the representations made that the kanom in favour of the family had been discharged, they were entitled to hold the properties against the plaintiffs. as regards their title to the equity ..... only properties which the tavazhi possessed was this kanom of rs. 3,000 and two other sums of rs. 1,200 and rs. 1,000 due by the manayil people and ayyatturai pattar, the sambandakkar of the 15th defendant. he also made the following statement which is significant: 'i cannot boldly say that the rent of the kanom of ..... panamballi people was not enjoyed by the 7th defendant and the income of the other two by the 15th defendants.' this statement was made in the cross-examination of the witness by .....