Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 section 139 repealed Court: supreme court of india Page 12 of about 122 results (1.908 seconds)

The State of Karnataka and ors. Vs. Gunjahalli Nagappa and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1975SC1708; (1976)1SCC204; [1976]1SCR57; 1975(7)LC568(SC)

..... fulfilled in order to entitle a per son to be enrolled as an electoral of the ajmer municipalities, namely, (1) that he should be entitled under the representation of the people act, 1950 to be registered in the electoral roll for a parliamentary constituency, if that constituency had been co-extensive with the municipality, and (2) that his ..... or in their addresses, including house numbers in which the reside, can be corrected by applying for rectification of the electoral roll under section 22 of the representation of the people act, 1950. so long as such rectification is not made, the entries in the electoral roll would stand and they would necessarily be reflected in the list ..... this contention is also without force. it is true that there is no provision in the act similar to section 23, sub-section (3) of the representation of the people act, 1950 providing that no amendment, trans-position or deletion of any entry in the 1ist of voters for a division shall be made and no direction for .....

Harmohinder Singh Pradhan Vs. Ranjeet Singh Talwandi and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC2379; 2005(5)ALLMR(SC)581; JT2005(5)SC4; (2005)5SCC46; 2005(2)LC870(SC)

..... round development of the area and spearheading the religious works.''appeal cast your precious vote and elect s. ranjeet singh talwandi the educated, honest, guardian of rights and truth and people friendly candidate of shiromani akali dal (badal), bjp-bsp from raikot assembly constituency.'6. below the two appeals, names of certain religious heads, to whom the appeals are attributed, ..... vaid, sant avtar singh, badni kalan, sant bir singh, madoke, member, sgpc, sant atma singh, dhurkot, member, sgpc and sant bharpoor singh barmi wale. he had called upon the people to cast their votes in furtherance to the wishes of their respective leaders and to keep their symbols high by letting his son - sh. ranjeet singh talwandi, to win from ..... r.c. lahoti, c.j.1. this appeal under section 116a of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter 'the act' for short) puts in issue an order passed by the designated election judge of the high court, whereby an election petition filed by the .....

Thakur Sen Negi Vs. Dev Raj Negi and Another

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1994SC2526; JT1993(3)SC189; 1993(2)SCALE738; 1993Supp(3)SCC645

..... ahmadi, j.1.the appellant filed an election petition no. 12 of 1985 in the high court of himachal pradesh under sections 80 81 100 and 101 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter called 'the r.p. act') challenging the election of respondent no. 1, dev raj negi from kinnaur (scheduled tribe) assembly constituency to the ..... election, as alleged in para 8 of the petition? if so, whether the same is a corrupt practice within the meaning of section 123(4) of the representation of people act, 1951?in this behalf the allegation was that the poster exh. p-l was got printed at the instance of respondent no. 2 at the printing press ..... and highlighting the promises made in his party's election manifesto, proposed developmental programmes envisaged by his party, etc., if returned to power, but if he threatens people of dire consequences for their failure to vote for his candidate or even threatens to shut down developmental programmes and schemes of the area, that would be a different .....

Shiv Charan Singh Vs. Maharaj Kumar Sri Brijendra Pal

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR1976SC785; (1976)2SCC928; [1976]1SCR416; 1975(7)LC749(SC)

..... regular and correct account of expenses incurred by them in connection with the election and that they incurred or authorised expenditure in contravention of section 77 of the representation of the people act, 1951. as regards the first ground, it was stated that the respondent and his election agent got published news item ex. 1 in 'kroach ..... them in connection with the election of the respondent 5. have the respondent and his election agent incurred or authorised expenditure in contravention of section 77 of the representation of the people act, 1951, as alleged in the election petition ?issues (1) and (2) were decided against the appellant. in view of the findings on issue ..... the respondent in that respect is that he was charged rs. 35 as daily hiring charge because he prevented the requisitioning of those trucks by making a representation that they were needed for his election campaign. evidence was also produced in support of the above stand of the respondent. the high court found the .....

Shivajirao B. Patil Kawekar Vs. Vilasrao D. Deshmukh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2000SC341; JT1999(9)SC448; 1999(7)SCALE310; (2000)1SCC398; 2000(1)LC147(SC)

..... on the ground of religion and community for prejudicially affecting the election of petitioner and thereby committed corrupt practice under section 123(3a) of the representation of people act? 4. preliminary objections were raised in the written statement filed before the high court by the appellant submitting that material facts and particulars relating ..... in weekly 'lawa lawi' communal tension was created in constituency and muslim voters had gathered in groups and thereby ultimately complaint under section 125 of the representation of people act and section 153a of the indian penal code bearing no. 9/1993 was filed with the gandhi chowk police station, latur?15) does petitioner ..... as a result of the magic played by the words 'mamuli' and thereby accepted the commission of corrupt practice under section 123(3a) of the representation of the people act?10) does petitioner prove that prof. m.b. pathan editor of weekly 'lawa lawi published article on 5.2.1995 under heading 'vilasrao .....

Ram Bhual Vs. Ambika Singh

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2005SC4233; 2005(4)AWC3786(SC); JT2005(12)SC49; 2005(7)SCALE669; (2005)12SCC121

..... trained in law could have come to, in the circumstances of the case. therefore, even while exercising our wide jurisdiction under section 116-a of the representation of the people act, 1951, we find no ground to interfere with the decision of the high court. we, therefore, confirm the decision of the high court declaring ..... it is well settled by the decisions of this court, that pleadings are very important and they, in fact, play a large part in adjudications arising under the representation of the people act, 1951. in sushil kumar v. rakesh kumar : air2004sc230, this court stated, 'the pleadings in an election petition must likewise be construed strictly.' therefore, the ..... the respondent, the defeated candidate, by election petition no. 5 of 2002 filed in the high court of allahabad under section 80 read with section 81 of the representation of the people act, 1951. the challenge to the election was rested on section 100 (1) (c) of the act. the plea was that the returning officer, while .....

Harikrishna Lal Vs. Babu Lal Marandi

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : 2004(5)ALLMR(SC)136; 2004(2)ALT53(SC); 2003(3)BLJR2337; [2004(1)JCR192(SC)]; JT2003(8)SC460; (2004)1MLJ119(SC); 2003(9)SCALE74; (2003)8SCC613

..... , 2001. february 3, 2001 was the date for withdrawal of nomination, if any. the nomination paper filed by the appellant was rejected by reference to section 8 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter 'the act', for short) for failure of the appellant to furnish certain information in a prescribed proforma supported by an affidavit, stating as to whether the ..... proviso as under:'.......... the new proviso to sub-section (4) is comprehensive in nature and it is on the lines of sub-section (5) of section 39 of the representation of the people act, 1951. this has been done to remove all possible doubts about the power of the returning officer to correct any misnomer or inaccurate description in regard to the .....

Meera Kanwaria Vs. Sunita and ors.

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2006SC597; 2006(1)AWC678(SC); 2006(2)BomCR566; 125(2005)DLT776(SC); JT2005(10)SC429; 2006(I)OLR(SC)186; (2006)1SCC344

..... this court found that at no stage of the proceedings, the appellant before it took any part in the proceedings. havine regard to section 116c of the representation of the people act 1951, it was held that the person would be entitled to maintain an appeal if the following conditions are satisfied :'(1) that the subject-matter ..... a seat reserved for tribal. article 332 of the constitution speaks of reservation of seats for scheduled tribes in legislative assemblies. the object is clearly to give representation in the legislature to scheduled tribe candidates, considered to be deserving of such special protection. to permit a non-tribal under cover of a marriage to contest ..... was held :'reservation must be considered from the social objective angle, having. regard to the constitutional scheme, and not as a political issue and, thus, adequate representation must be given to the members of the scheduled castes as a group and not to two or more groups of persons or members of castes.the very fact .....

Baldev Singh Mann Vs. Surjit Singh Dhiman

Court : Supreme Court of India

Reported in : AIR2009SC1045; (2009)1SCC633:2008AIRSCW188:2008(16)SCR540

..... in para nos. 5 and 7 of the election petition and thereby committed corrupt practice as defined under section 123(7) of the representation of people act? 18. issues 1 to 4 were treated as preliminary issues.19. on january 13, 2004, issues 1 to 4 were decided ..... 6-a to e and 7 of the election petition and thereby respondent committed corrupt practice as defined under section 123(7) of representation of people act, 1951? if so, its effect.17. on october 17, 2003, an additional issue was framed which reads as under:whether ..... in bhawanigarh. while addressing meetings in villages, the respondent specially thanked bachhi for the sacrifice made by him. bachhi also thanked the people for voting and supporting the respondent. there was a news item in this regard in the punjabi tribune dated 6.4.2002.11. ..... dalveer bhandari, j.1. this appeal has been preferred under section 116a of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the said act) against the judgment dated 8.12.2006 .....

G.M. Siddeshwar. Vs. Prasanna Kumar.

Court : Supreme Court of India

..... aharwar [1968] 3 scr 13 the question raised was as follows:whether the election petition is liable to be dismissed for contravention of section 81 (3) of the representation of the people act, 1951 as copy of annexure a' to the petition was not given along with the petition for being served on the respondents.58. it was noted that ..... sabha constituency in the election held on 13th april 2009. it was submitted in the application that the provisions of section 81(3) and section 83 of the representation of the people act, 1951 (hereinafter referred to as the act) had not been complied with and therefore, in view of section 86 of the act read with order vii ..... cure the defect. further, merely because the affidavit may be defective, it cannot be said that the petition filed is not an election petition as understood by the representation of the people act, 1951.the facts:4. the challenge in these appeals is to a judgment and order dated 24th february 2010 passed by a learned single judge of the .....