Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 chapter i corrupt partices Court: karnataka Page 4 of about 56 results (0.071 seconds)

H.M. Krishna Reddy Vs. H.C. Narayana Reddy

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : AIR2001Kant442; ILR2001KAR3870

The Court1. This is a defendant's second appeal. The respondent to this appeal is the plaintiff.2. Parties will be referred to with reference to the rank in the Trial Court.3. The plaintiff filed the suit for 'specific performance' of an agreement of sale dated 31-10-1975 by directing the defendant to execute the sale deed in his favour. He contended in the suit that the defendant is the owner of the land measuring 30 guntas in Survey No. 63/7 situated at Halanayakana Halli, Varthur Hobli, Bangalore South Taluk. By an agreement dated 31-10-1975, he 'Agreed to sell', the said land for a sale consideration of Rs. 4,000/-. After receiving the sale consideration the defendant parted with the land, and agreed to execute the 'sale deed', as and when the ban for selling the land, under the 'Karnataka Prevention of Fragmentation and Consolidation of Holdings Act', 1966 (hereinafter referred to as 'an Act') was repealed. On 28-10-1993, after the Act was repealed plaintiff by a written notice ca...

The Assistant Commissioner of Income Tax Vs. Abcon Engineering and Sys ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : (2007)208CTR(Kar)146; [2006]287ITR201(KAR); [2006]287ITR201(Karn)

1. All these cases are disposed of by this common order.ITA 86/99This appeal is at the Instance of the revenue. In relation to the assessment year 1995-96, the assessment was concluded in the respondent assessee's case, disallowing deduction as claimed under Section 80(O) of the Income Tax Act. An appeal was filed before the Appellate Commissioner. The appeal Stood dismissed. Thereafter an appeal was preferred to the tribunal. The tribunal allowed the appeal in terms of an order dtd 8-4-1999. Aggrieved by the order of the tribunal, the revenue is before us. The following questions of law are framed by this Court;Whether on the facts and in the circumstances of this case, the tribunal is correct in law in holding that the appellant is entitled for the relief in respect of deduction under Section 80-O of the Act?Whether on the facts and circumstances of the case, the tribunal is correct in law in entertaining the appeal by condoning the delay?ITRC 25/2000This reference is again at the in...

Shree Renuka Sugars Limited Vs. Union of India Ministry of Consumer Af ...

Court : Karnataka

..... petition. 21. all the prayers to the concerned authorities to stop the company from putting up unauthorized structure, have met with silence. the villagers have made representations to respondents no.7, 8 and 9 who are the district, sub-division and taluka magistrate to take action under section 133 of the code of criminal ..... express their resentment and opposition to the illegal activities and voices of people raised against construction of the factory without following the due procedure of law and the state authorities on the other hand are turning a deaf ear to the various representation made by the villagers to them. respondent no.17 is thus acting ..... openly express their resentment and opposition to the illegal activities and voices of people raised against construction of the factory without following the due procedure of law; and the state authorities on the other hand are turning a deaf ear to the various representation made by the villagers to them. respondent no.17 is thus acting .....

N. Satish and Others Vs. State of Karnataka, Represented by its Princi ...

Court : Karnataka

..... some of the provisions of the aggregator rules imposed onerous and vicarious liabilities on the petitioners, on 05.04.2016, the petitioner no.1 filed a representation before the principal secretary to the government, transport department, seeking certain clarifications with respect to the aggregator rules. thereafter, on 18.04.2016, the petitioner ..... and unbridled. moreover, technicalities of law cannot be permitted to become obstacles in the road to justice. if the impugned aggregator rules do violate the peoples' right to privacy, then mere technicality cannot be permitted to shield such a law from the power of judicial review. 152. constitutional history and ..... to the digital age, a person's personal information was known within a limited circle; in the digital age the personal information is available to unlimited people, institutions, and the government. personal information is co-related to right of privacy, as discussed above. the law also recognizes the importance of safeguarding the .....

Sri Samsthana Mahabaleshwara Devaru Vs. Secretary

Court : Karnataka

..... or training which are pertinent to the institution. the government order further states that gokarna temple is attached to the respondent - mutt and in light of the representations made by respondent- mutt, the temple was being deleted from the list of notified institutions on the basis of the opinion of the learned advocate general. but ..... statute or law. even in united states of america parens patriae jurisdiction has been exercised by the state for enhancing public interest such as health of the people or at times of strive or calamities. it cannot be exercised for or on behalf of individual entities such as respondent mutt or pontiff in the instant ..... of the power of original applicant. but public interest litigation cannot be a medium for settling disputes between individual parties or securing benefits to a particular section of people for furtherance of their personal rights. the court would disapprove any attempt which projects a private concern as a pil when no issue of law or of .....

Satish N Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... some of the provisions of the aggregator rules imposed onerous and vicarious liabilities on the petitioners, on 05.04.2016, the petitioner no.1 filed a representation before the principal secretary to the government, transport department, seeking certain clarifications with respect to the aggregator rules. thereafter, on 18.04.2016, the ..... and unbridled. moreover, technicalities of law cannot be permitted to become obstacles in the road to justice. if the impugned aggregator rules do violate the peoples' right to privacy, then mere technicality cannot be permitted to shield such a law from the power of judicial review.152. constitutional history and ..... to the digital age, a person's personal information was known within a limited circle; in the digital age the personal information is available to unlimited people, institutions, and the government. personal information is co-related to right of privacy, as discussed above. the law also recognizes the importance of safeguarding .....

High Court of Karnataka Vs. Sri Jai Chaitanya Dasa @ Jayanarayana K

Court : Karnataka

..... context otherwise requires,- (a) xxxxxx (b) xxxxxx (c) criminal contempt means the publication (whether by words, spoken or written, or by signs, or by visible representation, or otherwise) of any matter or the doing of any other act whatsoever which- (i) (ii) scandalises or tends to scandalise, or lowers or tends to ..... 4th appellant. the appellants respectfully state that they have made extensive enquires with the said temple/branch of the 1st appellant situated at seshadripuram, bangalore and people connected with it. neither the appellants, nor the disciples of the 4th appellant, nor anyone remotely connected with them have sent the said communication. 101 ..... .4. the appellants respectfully state that they have made extensive enquires with the said temple/branch of the 1st appellant situated at seshadripuram, bangalore and people connected with it. neither the appellants, nor the disciples of the 4th appellant, nor anyone remotely connected with them have sent the said communication. .....

Sri Vishwanath H M Vs. Government of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... certainly left in the lurch. what would be the fate of the minorities?. [article 296 stated that special considerations shall be shown to minorities to ensure representation in the services {(volume vii) debate on 30 may 1948} (emphasis supplied) 110. dr. b. r. ambedkars response summarises the different conceptions of ..... dignity of the individual. the great importance which the founding fathers of the constitution attached to the protection, advancement and prevention of exploitation of tribal people may be gathered from the several provisions of the constitution. apart from article 14 which, interpreted positively, must promote legislation to protect and further ..... socio-economic justice. the doctrine of political economy must include interpretation for the public good which is based on justice that would guide the people when questions of economic and social policy are under consideration.43. the learned senior counsel further stressed that the distinguishing characteristic of a welfare .....

The Tabocco Institute of India Vs. Union of India

Court : Karnataka

..... order.83. in s.r.chaudhuri vs. state of punjab and others [(2001) 7 scc126, it has been observed that, parliamentary democracy generally envisages (i)representation of the people, (ii) responsible government, and, (iii) accountability of the council of ministers to the legislature. the essence of this is to draw a direct line of ..... counsel, sri s.vijayashankar, has contended that in the instant case, after the impugned rules were laid before the parliament, there were several objections raised and representations made against the said rules. the said rules were referred to the parliamentary committee. the said committee submitted its interim report on 18/03/2015. by then ..... was no specific information available with the health ministry as to whether the images were the real images of human beings or were merely computer edited representational images. he has pointedly referred to the reply of the health ministry when asked to provide the source of images, stating that pictures were collected .....

Securities Exchange Board Of India Vs. Franklin Templeton Trustees Ser ...

Court : Karnataka

..... funds, shareholders of the asset management companies or trustee companies, their associates or group companies which results in the incidental acquisition of shares, voting rights or representation on the board of the asset management companies or trustee companies, this regulation shall be complied with within a period of one year of coming into ..... common law, custom or even contract. we share this view. the judicial control over the fast expanding maze of bodies affecting the 257 rights of the people should not be put into watertight compartment. it should remain flexible to meet the requirements of variable circumstances. mandamus is a very wide remedy which must be ..... indicated earlier. there also, the main consideration is that the company itself may not sink because of its own mismanagement or the interest of the shareholders or people generally may not be jeopardized for that reason. besides taking care of such interest as indicated above, there is no other interest of the state, to .....