Judgment Search Results Home > Cases Phrase: representation of the people act 1951 chapter i corrupt partices Court: karnataka Page 2 of about 56 results (0.188 seconds)

Prasanna Kumar and Another Vs. G.M. Siddeshwar and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... proves that the respondent, his election agent and others with their knowledge and consent, committed the corrupt practice within the meaning of section 123(2) of the representation of people act, 1951 by exercising undue influence and by threatening sri vijayakumar kondajji, his wife, smt. honnamma during the election campaign between 25th and 28th april 2009? ..... the result of the election declared on 16.05.2009? 2. whether the petitioner proves that the provisions contained in sections 36, 37 and 38 of the representation of people act, 1951 are violated? whether the petitioner proves that the said violations, if any, have materially affected the result of the election of the respondent? 3. ..... in e.p.no.2/2009: 1. whether the petitioner proves that the respondent was on the date of election disqualified under section 9a of the representation of people act, 1951 to be chosen to fill the seat of the 15th lok sabha constituency no.13 davanagere lok sabha constituency at the election held on .....

Mrs. Kavitha Mahesh Vs. Chief Election Commissioner, Election Commissi ...

Court : Karnataka

..... no. 1 to initiate suitable disciplinary action against respondent no. 4 as per provisions of representation of people act 1951, so that it serves as a deterrent and discourage such officer's from violating the statutory law and helps in upholding the constitutional right's ..... as null and void and order fresh elections in the interest of justice and equity, as the petitioner is entitled for relief under section 100(1)(c) representation of people act 1951, since rejection of petitioner's nomination paper at the threshold by the 4th respondent is illegal and improper.(b) pleased to direct the respondent's ..... under order vi rule 16 of code of civil procedure [for short the cpc] is by the respondent in an election petition presented under section 81 of the representation of people act, 1951 [for short, the act],2. the petitioner, who claims to have made an attempt to file her nomination papers for seeking election to the .....

Bommegowda Vs. State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : ILR1992KAR3148

..... further, learned counsel submitted that if it be the intention of government to invigorate even such authoritarian entities with a whiff of democratic aura provided by representation of people of that area, government cannot make an invidious distinction in the case of village panchayats and impose on them a non-democratic executive. the content ..... constituency to elect a member or members right up to the final resolution of the dispute, if any, concerning the election is regulated by the representation of the people act, 1951, different stages of the process being dealt with by different provisions of the act. there can be no election to parliament or the ..... state legislature except as provided by the representation of the people act, 1951 and again, no such election may be questioned except in the manner provided by the representation of the people act. so the representation of people act has been held to be a complete and self-contained code within which .....

Ishrath Banu Vs. The Returning Officer (Also, The Assistant Commission ...

Court : Karnataka

..... 13. both these cases deal with the filing of the election petition. thus, they deal with pre-trial situation. interestingly, both the karnataka municipal act and the representation of peoples act, 1951, do contain provisions which warrant that once the trial has begun, then the provisions of cpc would have to be followed as closely as possible. however ..... plaint could be submitted by the advocate, but this argument was rejected inter-alia on the ground that the provisions of cpc are not applicable to the representation of people act, 1951. it is in this context that the apex court observed as under: inspite of existence of adequate provisions in the code of civil procedure ..... presented "by" the plaintiff, but was presented by his advocate. since the requirement of sections 81 (1) and (3), read with 86(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951 was that the election petition has to be submitted "by" the plaintiff, the apex court was of the opinion that the election petition has not .....

B.S. Yeddyurappa Vs. the Lokayukta of Karnataka and Others

Court : Karnataka

..... is it not offering tv, wet grinder etc., to the voters after the election is over amounting to corruption? it is the high time that the representation of the people act, 1950 has to be amended.26. now coming to the point for consideration, we have to take note of the background for the government making ..... therefore both the investigation and acceptance of the report are violative of sections 9, 12 and 13 of k l act;(xxix) that the petitioner made a representation dated 1.8.2011 to the lokayukta seeking re-consideration of the report and give him an opportunity to substantiate his claim, but the same was not ..... been many complaints from transporters associations regarding overloading of transport vehicles, that illegal gratification was sought for allowing overloading of iron etc., and the repeated complaints and representations by transporters associations, it has been alleged to have not been seriously considered by the government. it is also alleged that most of the ore not accounted .....

Sri Sahasra Lingeshwara Temple, Rep. by Its Managing Trustee Sundaresh ...

Court : Karnataka

Reported in : 2007(1)KarLJ1

..... division on the basis of religious diversities. such claims to minority status based on religion would increase in the fond hope of various sections of people getting special protections, privileges and treatment as part of constitutional guarantee. encouragement to such fissiparous tendencies would be a serious jolt to the secular ..... all sections of the society as a united bharat. the directive principles of the constitution themselves visualize diversity and attempted to foster uniformity among people of different faiths. a uniform law though is highly desirable, enactment thereof in one go perhaps may be counter-productive to unity and integrity ..... or tenets propounded by different religions or their off-shoots the founding fathers while making the constitution were confronted with problems to unify and integrate people of india professing different religious faiths, born in different castes, sex or sub-sections in the society speaking different languages and dialects in different .....

Smt. Ishrath Banu Vs. The Returning Officer

Court : Karnataka

..... 13. both these cases deal with the filing of the election petition. thus, they deal with pre-trial situation. interestingly, both the karnataka municipal act and the representation of peoples act, 1951, do contain provisions which warrant that once the trial has begun, then the provisions of cpc would have to be followed as closely as possible. ..... could be submitted by the advocate, but this argument was rejected inter-alia on the ground that the provisions of cpc are not applicable to 14 the representation of people act, 1951. it is in this context that the apex court observed as under: inspite of existence of adequate provisions in the code of civil procedure relating ..... presented "by" the plaintiff, but was presented by his advocate. since the requirement of sections 81 (1) and (3), read with 86(1) of the representation of the people act, 1951 was that the election petition has to be submitted "by" the plaintiff, the apex court was of the opinion that the election petition has not been .....

Smt Jayamma Vs. The State of Karnataka

Court : Karnataka

..... by a larger bench than in gainda ram [gainda ram v. mcd, (2010) 10 scc715 it is quite clear that the decision, whether or not section 8 of the representation of the people act, 1951 is to be amended, rests solely with parliament.11. having regard to the settled position, the impugned directions are unsustainable.94. the division bench of this court .....

Yellappa S/o Shivasharnappa Naikodi Vs. The Chief Secretary And Anr

Court : Karnataka Kalaburagi

..... therefore, he argued that the writ petitions are liable to be dismissed. he also invited the attention of the court 22 to section 30 of the representation of the people act, 1951 and argued that there is no stage of interruption of election process as argued by the learned senior counsel appearing for the petitioners and ..... that, the writ petitions are not maintainable under article 226 of the constitution of india. he invited the attention of the court to section 23 of the representation of the people act, 1950 and submitted that sub-sections (2) and (3) of section 23 of the above act are the consequential orders which are of ministerial ..... area and therefore, he submitted that the arguments advanced by sri a.s. ponnanna, learned senior counsel, cannot be 20 accepted. referring to section 23 of representation of peoples act, 1950, he submitted that inclusion of the additional five voters, is in accordance with law and he further submitted that some of the petitioners have challenged .....

Buoyant Technology Constellations Pvt Ltd Vs. M/s Manyata Reallty

Court : Karnataka

..... high court was competent to frame rule for making provision for receiving the election petitions presented to the high court under section 81 of the representation of the people act. it is in that context that the supreme court elucidated the difference between ministerial act and adjudicatory act. it was observed, by ..... in the elections held to the badarpur legislative assembly constituency of assam. the contesting respondent filed an election petition under sections 80/81 of the representation of the people act, to challenge the election of the appellant. the election petition was presented before the stamp reporter-cum-oath commissioner of the high court ..... address the controversy involved in this case. it was in the - 28 - context of presentation of election petition under section 81 of the representation of the people act, 1951 that the supreme court discussed the difference between the ministerial function and adjudicatory function and further that by which authority and at which .....