Skip to content


Represent - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: represent Sorted by: old Year: 1932 Page 1 of about 307 results (0.052 seconds)
Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Transit Commission Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... volume of freight 75 percent of which is interstate in these respects the branch is representative of conditions throughout the system there are five passenger stations on the branch line flushing ..... claimed by the carrier the commission however concluded that the railroad s figures came nearer representing the true situation than those offered by the intervenors the latter further assert that the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Marine Transit Corp. Vs. Dreyfus

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... or territories or with foreign nations be it enacted by the senate and house of representatives of the united states of america in congress assembled that maritime transactions as herein defined ..... united states arbitration act footnote 2 the committee on the judiciary of the house of representatives in its report upon the bill which with the senate amendment became the act in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (PC)

Vishnu Sitaram Auchat Vs. Ramchandra Govind Joshi

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

Reported in: AIR1932Bom466; (1932)34BOMLR849

..... lal srimali a minor not a party to the suit was concerned and was not represented before the court in the present case vinayak govind and plaintiff and defendant and their .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 04 1932 (FN)

Atchison, Topeka and Santa Fe Ry. Co. Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-04-1932

..... percent of their total revenues in 1924 that year being used in the report as representative and that the effect of the order in question would be to reduce the general ..... description of the traffic of the carriers in a vast territory cannot be regarded as representative of the conditions existing in page 284 u s 261 1931 that record pertains to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

Adhar Kumar Mitter and ors. Vs. Radha Madan Mohan Jiu and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: 139Ind.Cas.180

..... circumstances of the present case the receiver appointed by this court representing the thakur appears to be absolutely entitled to the money ..... the owner in this case the thakur so that the receiver representing the thakur is absolutely entitled to the property and therefore ..... become a person competent to alienate the land the receiver represents not only the shebaits but the thakur and the thakur .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

Adhar Kumar Mitter and ors. Vs. Radha Madan Mohan JIn and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: AIR1932Cal660

..... circumstances of the present case the receiver appointed by this court representing the thakur appears to be absolutely entitled to the money ..... the owner in this case the thakur so that the receiver representing the thakur is absolutely entitled to the property and therefore ..... become a person competent to alienate the land the receiver represents not only the shebaits but the thakur and the thakur .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

M.V.K. Venkataraman and ors. Vs. S. Sivagurunatha Chettiar and ors.

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: AIR1933Mad639

..... by decision of the privy council the creditors of the temple whose interests the plaintiffs represent must be held to be protected if it appears that immediate necessity existed for contracting ..... by decision of the privy council the creditors of the temple whose interests the plaintiffs represent must be held to be protected if it appears that immediate necessity existed for contracting .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

The Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. K. Siddha Goudar and Sons

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: (1932)62MLJ638

..... was rs 55 584 on this liability of rs 55 584 which represented borrowed money a sum of rs 6 967 was due for interest ..... they were admitted by the petitioners viz 1 that the deduction claimed represents the interest on capital borrowed entirely for the purpose of the two ..... to say upon such a distribution that some part of it represented trading profits and some part of it trading losses it was in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 05 1932 (PC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Messrs K. Siddha Gouder and Sons

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jan-05-1932

Reported in: AIR1932Mad375; 137Ind.Cas.689

..... was rs 55 584 on this liability of rs 55 584 which represented borrowed money a sum of rs 6 967 was due for interest ..... they were admitted by the petitioners viz 1 that the deduction claimed represents the interest on capital borrowed entirely for the purpose of the two ..... to say upon such a distribution that some part of it represented trading profits and some part of it trading losses it was in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 06 1932 (PC)

Puttoo Lal and ors. Vs. Munshi Lal and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Jan-06-1932

Reported in: AIR1932All466; 140Ind.Cas.529

..... for the balance of the decree still subsists whoever allege themselves to be the legal representatives of behari lal are competent to make an application for substitution of names we allow .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT


Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //