Skip to content


Repeatedly - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: repeatedly Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 1,577 results (0.03 seconds)
Jan 22 2002 (FN)

Kansas Vs. Crane

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-22-2002

..... required finding of a causal connection between the likelihood of repeat acts of sexual violence and the existence of a mental ..... safety of others 420 order that causes a likelihood of repeat sexual violence in itself establishes the requisite difficulty if not ..... and volitional impairments id at 352 it is true that we repeatedly referred to hendricks s volitional problems because that was evidently .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 2002 (FN)

Eldred Vs. Ashcroft

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Oct-09-2002

286 u s 123 127 1932 as this court has repeatedly said the congress did not sanction an existing right but

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 22 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Customs Vs. Dipen Enterprises

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Oct-22-2002

Reported in: (2003)(160)ELT632Tri(Mum.)bai

..... and that by itself cannot act as proof of repeated violation of exim policy repeated violation would need strict proof which we find ..... 34 the law gives a number of weapons to deal with repeated offenders section 125 itself permits the authority to confiscate the ..... xvi of the act provides for prosecution the importers who repeatedly flout prohibitions in force can be prosecuted under section 135 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jan 09 2002 (FN)

National Railroad Passenger Corporation Vs. Morgan

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jan-09-2002

..... lindemann p grossman employment discrimination law 348 349 3d ed 1996 hereinafter lindemann the repeated nature of the harassment or its intensity constitutes evidence that management knew or should ..... vii such claims are based on the cumulative effect of individual acts we have repeatedly made clear that although title vii mentions specific employment decisions with immediate consequences the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 09 2002 (HC)

Union of India (Uoi) and anr. Vs. Central Administrative Tribunal, Cha ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Dec-09-2002

Reported in: (2003)134PLR200

g s singhvi j 1 whether the central administrative tribunal for short the tribunal established under the administrative tribunals act...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2002 (HC)

Cit Vs. Hindustan Coconut Oil Mill

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: (2002)174CTR(Cal)583

by the courtthe questions which have come up for answer by us in this reference are as follows 1 whether...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 13 2002 (HC)

Commissioner of Income-tax Vs. Hindustan Coconut Oil Mill

Court: Kolkata

Decided on: Mar-13-2002

Reported in: [2002]255ITR428(Cal)

1 the questions which have come up for answer by us in this reference are as follows 1 whether on...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 21 2002 (HC)

Mohammad Suleman Vs. State of U.P. and ors.

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Mar-21-2002

Reported in: 2002CriLJ2725

j c gupta j 1 the petitioner mohd suleman has been detained under section 3 2 of the national security...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2002 (FN)

Hope Vs. Pelzer

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Jun-27-2002

..... 240 f 3d 975 2001 before reaching the 2 the most repeated complaint of the hitching post however was the strain it ..... this suggestion is plainly wrong rather this court of appeals has repeatedly made clear that it imposes no such requirement on plaintiffs seeking ..... 741 one wonders how federal district courts in alabama could have repeatedly arrived at the opposite conclusion and how respondents in turn .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 06 2002 (FN)

Norfolk and Western R. Co. Vs. Ayers

Court: US Supreme Court

Decided on: Nov-06-2002

..... lower court authority for the proposition that the fela contemplates apportionment and this court has repeatedly stated that joint and several liability is the traditional rule see e g the atlas ..... the time of fela s enactment in 1908 brief for petitioner 32 this court s repeated statements concerning joint and several liability refute that contention many of norfolk s historical authorities .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //