Repeat Offender - Judgment Search Results

Lewis Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... the maximum sentence as one who deals to adults and repeat offenders who sell to children subject to three times the normal maximum 18 u s c ..... use of the particular state statute at issue the primary question we repeat is one of legislative intent does applicable federallaw indicate an intent to punish conduct such as the defendant s to the exclusion of the particular state statute at issue ante .....

The Sangli Bank Ltd. Vs. Kanishka Investments Pvt. Ltd. and Others

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1999(1)ALLMR556; 1999(1)BomCR660

..... without considering the seriousness of the issues framed and without considering the consequences when the defendant has been repeatedly and from the beginning asserted that he has signed the blank documents and when the .....

Caron Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

..... intent congress believing that existing state laws provided less than positive assurance that a repeat violent offender no longer poses an unacceptable risk of dangerousness intended to keep guns away from ..... is a predicate for neither the substantive offense nor the sentence enhancement if the offender has had his civil rights restored unless such restoration of civil rights expressly provides .....

Annasaheb Urubasappa Arali Vs. Basappa Virupaksha Dugni

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(5)BomCR699; (1998)2BOMLR207

..... shop was given to the defendant sale deed was to be executed as per the convenience of the parties 6 after the death of gangavva defendant repeatedly requested the plaintiff to perform ..... the contract by executing a sale deed but the plaintiff never executed sale deed and defendant is therefore intending to file .....

Vadde Sanna Hulugappa and Others Vs. Vadde Sanna Hulufappa (Deceased) ...

Court: Karnataka

Reported in: AIR1998Kant325; ILR1998KAR2127; 1998(4)KarLJ365

..... property is the joint family property of the plaintiffs and the first defendant 8 to repeat both the courts have held that the suit house is the joint family property of the plaintiffs and the first defendant but they dismissed the suit solely pn the ground that the plaintiffs .....

Sonia Senroy of Mumbai Vs. Amit Senroy of Mumbai

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR1998Bom302; 1998(3)ALLMR48; 1998(3)BomCR829; I(1999)DMC233; 1998(3)MhLj726

..... even though he was not on night duty she also found packets of condom in defendant s trouser s pocket on being confronted with the same the defendant tried to give some excuse this was again repeated when the defendant came back from one of his foreign trips the plaintiff found out that .....

Thottathil Thamasikkum Cherootty Alias Balan Vs. Puliyaratharayil Vela ...

Court: Kerala

Reported in: AIR1998Ker164

..... injunction as prayed for the second prayer is for a mandatory injunction directing the defendant to restore the b schedule way to its original position as the plaintiff has no ..... planted in the varamba without the consent of the defendant the post was planted on 17 2 1983 in spite of repeated requests the defendant did not remove the post since the defendant has come to know that the post was .....

Netram Ganpat Ingale Deceased Through His L.Rs. Vs. Baliram Vyankat Mi ...

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 1998(3)ALLMR424; 1998(3)BomCR343; 1998(3)MhLj667

..... were being used mainly for residence and business same contention has also been repeated in the written statement when the defendant was in witness box he has admitted in his cross examination as under i prepare ..... serious prejudice as well as injustice to the plaintiffs and even otherwise original defendant had also acquired property viz both the courts have assessed oral as well as documentary .....

K. Ramakrishna Lamia Kathir Ahigusamy Naicker Vs. Narayanaswamy

Court: Chennai

Reported in: (1998)2MLJ306

..... not entitled to the benefit of act 18 of 1980 and in spite of repeated demands the defendant did not repay the amount due the defendant made several pleas and ultimately both the cot is below found that the ..... suit promissory note executed by the defendant was supported by consideration2 learned counsel for he appellant is not seriously disputing the finding .....

Gurdev Singh Vs. State

Court: Delhi

Reported in: 1998IVAD(Delhi)734; 1998CriLJ3580; 1998(4)Crimes676; 76(1998)DLT918

..... to protect society by deterring potential offenders as also by preventing the guilty party from repeating the offence it is also designed ..... to reform the offender and reclaim him as law abiding ..... not deter and the other may frustrate thereby making the offender a hardened criminal in the present case after weighing the .....