Repealing - Judgment Search Results

Khopade Kisanrao Manikrao Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2000)74ITD25(Pune.)

1 this appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of asstt commissioner of income tax inv cir 2...

Khopade Kisanrao Manikrao Vs. Assistant Commissioner of Income

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

1 this appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of asstt cit inv cir 2 1 jalgaon under...

Williams Vs. Taylor, Warden

Court: US Supreme Court

williams v taylor warden 529 u s 362 2000 october term 1999 syllabus williams v taylor warden certiorari to the...

R. Sivakumar, Ias Vs. Union Public Service Commission

Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras

1 the applicant in oa nos 238 and 781 of 1998 is the same person and has assailed the impugned...

India Seed House Vs. Assistant Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi

1 this appeal of the assessee is relevant for the block period 1st april 1986 to 20th july 1996 the...

Roe Vs. Flores-ortega

Court: US Supreme Court

roe v flores ortega 528 u s 470 2000 october term 1999 syllabus roe warden v flores ortega certiorari to...

M.B. Chemicals Vs. Deputy Commissioner of

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2000)76ITD1(Pune.)

1 this appeal by the asscssec is directed against the order of the cit a nasik relating to assessment year...

M.B. Chemicals Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

Reported in: (2001)76ITD1(Pune.)

this appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the commissioner appeals nasik relating to assessment year 1994...

M. B. Chemicals Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Pune

1 this appeal by the assessee is directed against the order of the cit a nasik relating to asst yr...

Shalala Vs. Illinois Council on Long Term Care, Inc.

Court: US Supreme Court

..... different meaning with regard to part a than with regard to part b nor since repeals by implication are disfavored any basis for holding that the subsequent addition of a judicial .....