Skip to content


Repayable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: repayable Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 6,227 results (0.079 seconds)
Jun 07 2002 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Meco Tronics (P) Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Jun-07-2002

Reported in: (2002)LC662Tri(Chennai)

1 this is revenue appeal against order in original no 28 96 dated 2 8 96 passed by cce madras...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 23 2002 (HC)

Abdul Jabbar Ansari and ors. Vs. Bhola Tiwari and ors.

Court: Patna

Decided on: Jul-23-2002

radha mohan prasad j 1 this appeal at the instance of the defendant ist party is directed against the judgment...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 27 2002 (HC)

M. Liaquat Ali, Proprietor, M.C. Packaging, Pudukkottai Vs. Sri Brahad ...

Court: Chennai

Decided on: Jun-27-2002

Reported in: (2002)3MLJ296

k govindarajan j 1 the unsuccessful defendants in the suits have filed these second appeals having aggrieved by the judgments...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 10 2002 (TRI)

Manoj Hajela Vs. State Bank of India

Court: Delhi State Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission SCDRC New Delhi

Decided on: Apr-10-2002

lokeshwar prasad president 1 the present appeal filed by the appellant under section 15 of the consumer protection act 1986...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 2002 (SC)

Sampath Kumar Vs. Ayyakannu and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Sep-13-2002

Reported in: AIR2002SC3369; 2002(6)ALD63(SC); 2002(4)ALLMR(SC)866; 2003(1)AWC18(SC); 2002(51)BLJR93; [2003(1)JCR283(SC)]; JT2002(7)SC182; (2002)3MLJ160(SC); RLW2003(1)SC49; 2002(6)SCALE

order1 leave granted 2 the plaintiff appellant filed a suit for issuance of permanent prohibitory injunction alleging the plaintiff appellant...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 23 2002 (TRI)

Additional Commissioner of Vs. Chodavaram Co-op. Sugars Ltd.

Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Vizag

Decided on: Aug-23-2002

Reported in: (2003)86ITD139Visakha

..... enabled the entrepreneurs to utilise the surplus funds generated through higher free sale quota for repayment of term loans advanced by central financial institutions and sugar development fund thus the ..... the utilisation certificate issued by statutory auditors asserting that such receipts were fully utilised for repayment of term loans and in the process of recoupment of capital employed by the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Aug 09 2002 (TRI)

Cable Corporation of India Ltd.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Decided on: Aug-09-2002

..... under various categories of deposits the reasons due to which the company could not make repayment of entire amount of deposits relating to various categories in respect of first instalment ..... 8 taking into consideration the difficulties explained by the authorised representative of the company in repayment of 1st instalment to deposits under various categories as per schedule approved by this bench .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2002 (TRI)

Pagoda Forests Ltd. Vs. Chairman, Securities and

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Mar-28-2002

..... may be specified by the board 74 existing scheme not desirous of obtaining registration to repay an existing collective investment scheme which is not desirous of obtaining provisional registration from ..... the board shall formulate a scheme of repayment and make such repayment to the existing investors in the manner specified in regulation 73 24 on .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2002 (TRI)

Phenomenal Plantations Ltd. Vs. Securities and Exchange Board of India

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Mar-28-2002

..... is not desirous of obtaining provisional registration is permitted to formulate a scheme of repayment and make repayment to the existing investors in the manner specified in regulation 73 that in terms ..... for grant of registration had failed to wind up your collective investment schemes and make repayments to your investors in accordance with the sebi collective investment schemes regulation 1999 the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 13 2002 (TRI)

Varindhaban Forests Ltd. and Vs. the Securities and Exchange Board of ...

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Sep-13-2002

..... of registration had failed to wind up your existing collective investment schemes and make repayments to your investors in accordance with the provisions of the sebi collective investment schemes ..... be specified by the board 74 existing scheme not desirous of obtaining registration to repay an existing collective investment scheme which is not desirous of obtaining provisional registration from .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //