Renderer - Judgment Search Results

National Assn. of Home Builders Vs. Defenders of Wildlife

Court: US Supreme Court

..... representative s preliminary determination is later overruled at a higher agency level does not render the decisionmaking process arbitrary and capricious the epa s final approval notice stating that ..... agency representative is later overruled at a higher level within the agency does not render the decisionmaking process arbitrary and capricious respondents also point to the final federal register .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Ishwarsharan Kedarnath Bhargava and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)BomCR757

..... compulsion to do so has arisen as the trial court has virtually treated the award rendered by the land acquisition officer as a judgment under appeal and has evinced unawareness of .....

State of Maharashtra Vs. Prashram Jagannath Aute

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: AIR2007Bom167; 2007(5)ALLMR711; 2007(5)BomCR847; 2007(5)CTC97; [2008(1)JCR431]; 2007(5)MhLj403

..... compulsion to do so has arisen as the trial court has virtually treated the award rendered by the land acquisition officer as a judgment under appeal and has evinced unawareness of .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Smt. Fulyabai Kisan Govardhane and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)ALLMR207; 2008(1)BomCR386; (2007)109BOMLR2043; 2008(3)MhLj278

..... compulsion to do so has arisen as the trial court has virtually treated the award rendered by the land acquisition officer as a judgment under appeal and has evinced unawareness of .....

The State of Maharashtra Vs. Ishwarsharan Kedarnath Bhargava,

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2007(6)ALLMR150; 2008(3)MhLj331

..... compulsion to do so has arisen as the trial court has virtually treated the award rendered by the land acquisition officer as a judgment under appeal and has evinced unawareness of .....

The State of Maharashtra, Vs. Yashwant Kahnu Shirsath

Court: Mumbai

Reported in: 2008(1)BomCR204; (2007)109BOMLR1511

..... relevant consideration the distinction between surrounding areas which are already developed by itself would not render the acquired land which is not so developed for claiming similar amount a division bench ..... compulsion to do so has arisen as the trial court has virtually treated the award rendered by the land acquisition officer as a judgment under appeal and has evinced unawareness of .....

Bata India Ltd. and ors. Vs. State of West Bengal and ors.

Court: Kolkata

Reported in: 2008CriLJ164

orderpartha sakha datta j 1 by this application dated 25 4 2007 under section 482 of the cr p c...

Nidhia Ram Vs. State of H.P.

Court: Himachal Pradesh

Reported in: 2007CriLJ2598,2007(1)ShimLC201

surjit singh j 1 appellant nidhia ram has been convicted of offences under sections 302 and 201 ipc for allegedly...

Ms. Heena Dutt Vs. Chavi Designs Pvt. Ltd. and Mr.

Court: Company Law Board CLB

Reported in: (2007)141CompCas172

1 in this order i am considering company petition no 10 of 2002 wherein ms heena dutt the petitioner who...

Spandrel Vs. the Commissioner of Central

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT

Reported in: (2007)11STJ130CESTAT(Bang.)alore

1 the appellant is required to pre deposit duty amount of rs 1 09 39 242 appellants have been brought...