Regularly - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: regularly Year: 2006 Page 1 of about 301 results (0.098 seconds)Regular Traders Vs. State of Punjab and ors.
Court: Punjab and Haryana
Decided on: Apr-25-2006
Reported in: (2007)10VST245(P& H)
1 the petitioner has approached this court by filing the present petition under section 9 2 of the central sales...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTMohd. Hanif and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Patna
Decided on: Oct-11-2006
Reported in: (2007)IISLJ341CAT
the wages that were being paid to those who are regularly appointed and are doing the same work it would be
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTHamdan Vs. Rumsfeld
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Jun-29-2006
..... practical need explains the departures here for these reasons the commission cannot be considered regularly constituted under united states law and thus does not satisfy congress requirement that ..... and because different countries with different government structures handle this matter differently accordingly a regularly constituted court is a court that has been appointed set up or established .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTTiraj S/O Karan Singh and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) Through
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Oct-12-2006
1 o a 2713 2004 o a 3063 2004 and o a 3059 2004 were referred to by a single...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTP. Moorthy and ors. Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Madras
Decided on: Jul-04-2006
Reported in: (2007)(2)SLJ103CAT
directing the tamil nadu circle of postal department to absorb regularly casual labourers full time and part time as and when
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSmt. Suman Lata W/O Shri K.K. Vs. Union of India (Uoi), Through the
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-15-2006
1 the facts and issues in these oas being identical the same are being disposed of by this common order...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Ranjan Chandra Vs. the Secretary to the Government of
Court: Central Administrative Tribunal CAT Delhi
Decided on: Sep-07-2006
hoc or temporary employee he must be replaced only by regularly selected employee the ad hoc appointment should not be device
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBimal Kumar Singhania Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Kolkata
Decided on: Jan-06-2006
Reported in: (2006)100TTJ(Kol.)790
1 these three appeals preferred by the aforesaid assessees are directed against the separate orders passed by the cit a...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSlocum Investment (P) Ltd. Vs. Deputy Commissioner of Income Tax
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2006
Reported in: (2006)101TTJ(Delhi)558
by the assessee company in the returns of income filed regularly in the year under consideration as well as for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTSlocum Investment P. Ltd. (Now Vs. the Deputy Commissioner of Income
Court: Income Tax Appellate Tribunal ITAT Delhi
Decided on: Mar-24-2006
by the assessee company in the returns of income filed regularly for the year under consideration as well as for the
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial