Skip to content


Refutable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: refutable Sorted by: recent Year: 2005 Page 1 of about 466 results (0.008 seconds)
Dec 27 2005 (TRI)

German Remedies Limited Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Dec-27-2005

1 the appellants had filed a refund claim of rs 976893 for the period from 18 2002 to 24 2002...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 27 2005 (TRI)

Sebi Vs. Atmaram Kejriwal and Co.

Court: SEBI Securities and Exchange Board of India or Securities Appellate Tribunal SAT

Decided on: Dec-27-2005

..... the broker has failed to offer satisfactory explanation to rebut the charge atmaram has not refuted the charge and has apparently violated directives of sebi issued vide circular no smdrp policy .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 26 2005 (TRI)

Sharma Carpets Vs. Director, Enforcement Directorate

Court: Appellate Tribunal for foreign Exchange New Delhi

Decided on: Dec-26-2005

1 the following order of the appellate tribunal has been delivered by shri r n poddar member 2 the appellants...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 23 2005 (HC)

Surya Deo Mishra Son of Awadh Kishore Mishra Vs. the State of U.P. Thr ...

Court: Allahabad

Decided on: Dec-23-2005

Reported in: (2006)IILLJ583All

..... earlier judgments of that court in collector of madras and burn standard company supra it refuted the claim after distinguishing the two decisions and held in the present case however no .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Sarva Shramik Sangh and ors. Vs. Kamala Mills and anr.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-22-2005

Reported in: 2006(3)ALLMR176; 2006(5)BomCR861; [2006(109)FLR792]; (2006)IILLJ468Bom; 2006(2)MhLj690

..... narayan babaji samari the only witness produced by the employer has not stated a word refuting the claim of the bonus for the year 1981 and salary for 17 days in .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 22 2005 (HC)

Ushakant N. Patel Vs. Commissioner of Income Tax

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-22-2005

Reported in: (2006)201CTR(Guj)501; [2006]282ITR553(Guj)

d a mehta j 1 the applicant assessee has proposed the following eight questions 1 whether in the facts and...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2005 (HC)

Pratibha Naitthani Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and ors.

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Dec-21-2005

Reported in: AIR2006Bom259; 2006(3)ALLMR213; 2006(2)BomCR41; [2006]4CompCas544(Bom)

..... learned senior counsel appearing for the respondent no 4 and respondent nos 3 and 7 refuted the submission of the learned counsel for the petitioner and submitted that neither of these .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2005 (HC)

Sansar Chand and anr. Vs. State of J and K

Court: Jammu and Kashmir

Decided on: Dec-21-2005

Reported in: 2006CriLJ2443

..... the accused under section 342 cr p c were also recorded in which they have refuted the allegations they entered into their defence and examined marad roop chand and ganja as .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 21 2005 (HC)

Smt. Kumari Bai and anr. Etc. Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and anr. Etc.

Court: Chhattisgarh

Decided on: Dec-21-2005

Reported in: AIR2006Chh52; 2006(3)MPHT42(CG)

s r nayak c j 1 in these writ petitions the constitutional validity of section 401 of chhattisgarh municipal corporation...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 20 2005 (HC)

ite India Private Ltd. Vs. Shri Mukesh Sharma and ors.

Court: Delhi

Decided on: Dec-20-2005

Reported in: 2006(1)ARBLR155(Delhi); 127(2006)DLT62; 2006(87)DRJ83

sanjay kishan kaul j 1 the plaintiff has filed the suit for declaration whereby a decree of declaration is sought...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //