Skip to content


Refundable - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: refundable Year: 2003 Page 1 of about 1,641 results (0.022 seconds)
Dec 05 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Co. Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-05-2003

Reported in: (2004)1GLR637; [2004]53SCL330(Guj)

..... cancel the same by sending the insured a thirty days notice and refunding the pro rata premium for the unexpired period according to the ..... insured s last known address and in such event the company shall refund to the insured a pro rata premium for unexpired period of ..... time cancel this policy and in such event the company shall allow refund of premium at company s short period rate only table given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2003 (HC)

United India Insurance Company Ltd. Vs. Mohanlal Aggarwal

Court: Gujarat

Decided on: Dec-05-2003

Reported in: 2004ACJ1657

..... cancel the same by sending the insured a thirty days notice and refunding the prorata premium for the unexpired period according to the insurer ..... s last known address and in such event the company shall refund to the insured a pro rata premium for unexpired period of ..... cancel this policy and in such event the company shall allow refund of premium at company s short period rate only table given .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 01 2003 (TRI)

Collector of C. Ex. Vs. Indian Rayon and Industries Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Mumbai

Decided on: Apr-01-2003

Reported in: (2003)(159)ELT896Tri(Mum.)bai

..... 99 e l t 502 within six months of the refund here the refund was ordered in 1996 no such show cause notice ..... of a person other than a manufacturer to claim the refund the departmental representative paraphrases these conclusions when he says that ..... of the act permitting persons other than the manufacturer to claim refund were introduced consequence upon with a particular purpose the clearly .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 05 2003 (HC)

Punjab State Warehousing Corporation Vs. Commissioner of Income-tax an ...

Court: Punjab and Haryana

Decided on: Feb-05-2003

Reported in: [2003]264ITR597(P& H)

..... no 2 passed an assessment order dated november 23 1978 annexure p3 which created the refund and the refund was paid on december 21 1978 13 learned counsel for the petitioner contends that even ..... this proposition of law however the petitioner corporation is not entitled to interest on the refunded amount as no refund was made out after the initial assessment framed on january 30 1976 it is only .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 11 2003 (TRI)

Hindusthan Motors Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Calcutta

Decided on: Mar-11-2003

Reported in: (2003)(88)ECC296

..... certificates issued by the state transport authorities the cheque numbers and dates relating to the refunds of the amounts to the taxi owners they have fulfilled the conditions of the notifications ..... saloon cars are registered as taxis this involves cumbersome correspondence resulting in delays in settling refund claims accordingly the board is of the view that having regard to the intention beyond .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 20 2003 (TRI)

Oswal Chemicals and Fertilisers Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-20-2003

Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC216

..... duty along with the ground claim for duty concession where such a claim succeeds the refundable amount becomes payable to the manufacturer and the duty paying documents are thereafter suitably ..... commissioner in charge of the refinery alone who not only can determine the computation of refundable amount but also other eligibility parameters such as acceptance of duty paying documents limitation .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Nov 28 2003 (TRI)

WavIn India Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Nov-28-2003

Reported in: (2004)(164)ELT269TriDel

..... or deteriorated goods under section 22 that all claims for refund have to be filed in their prescribed form within the ..... section 27 there was no pending proceedings as the admissibility of refund had already been decided by the collector appeals under order ..... sub section 1 itself requires a person making an application for refund to furnish documents and evidence including the documents referred to .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Dec 05 2003 (TRI)

Roots Industries Ltd. Vs. Cce

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Dec-05-2003

Reported in: (2004)(91)ECC449

..... the claim on the ground that the appellants become eligible for refund only on payment of duty on the repaired reconditioned goods ..... also made a prayer before the adjudicating authority for keeping the refund claims pending till the clearance of the repaired goods on ..... rather than rejecting the claims on the ground that amount of refund has not been specified in the claims more particularly when .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Sep 15 2003 (TRI)

Commissioner of Central Excise Vs. Rane Brake Linings Ltd.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Tamil Nadu

Decided on: Sep-15-2003

Reported in: (2003)(158)ELT840Tri(Chennai)

..... payment of duty section 11b is not applicable to refund of such deposit limitation refund section 11b of central excise act 1944 amount ..... commissioner of c ex nagpur v abhideep chemicals pvt ltd holding refund limitation duty paid under protest duty paid while filing appeal ..... to contest liability is payment of duty under protest refund not hit by normal limitation period para 83 of apex .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Oct 09 2003 (TRI)

Padmini Polymers Ltd. Vs. Commissioner of C. Ex.

Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi

Decided on: Oct-09-2003

Reported in: (2004)(92)ECC389

..... been sanctioned to m s padmini polymers within three months of their filing the refund application the refund has been initially rejected by the dy commissioner which has subsequently been sanctioned by ..... that since the amount was deposited in delhi commissionerate which has separate account head the refund claim is not admissible in meerut commissionerate shri c harishankar learned advocate on the .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //