Skip to content


Refund - Judgment Search Results

Home > Cases Phrase: refund Year: 2000 Page 1 of about 596 results (0.053 seconds)
Jan 25 2000 (SC)

Commissioner of Income Tax, Bombay Vs. M/S. Kanji Shivji and Co.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Jan-25-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC774; (2000)158CTR(SC)537; [2000]242ITR124(SC); JT2000(1)SC350; 2000(1)SCALE250; (2000)2SCC253; [2000]1SCR365

order1 this appeal stands referred to a bench of three judges because it was found that a bench of two...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 26 2000 (SC)

E. Madhavi Pallikkaramma and anr. Vs. K.V. Prabhakaran Nair and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-26-2000

Reported in: JT2000(7)SC577; (2001)9SCC726

..... section 22 suit for specific performance alternative prayer for refund of earnest money held plaintiff is entitled to seek alternative relief ..... section 22 suit for specific performance alternative prayer for refund of earnest money held plaintiff is entitled to seek alternative relief ..... of refund of earnest money in the event of decree for specific .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jun 05 2000 (HC)

Pandurang Ramchandra Jadhav (Gursale) Vs. Shri Uttaralaxmidevi Public ...

Court: Mumbai

Decided on: Jun-05-2000

Reported in: 2000(4)ALLMR135; 2000(4)BomCR791

ordera m khanwilkar j 1 by this petition under article 227 of the constitution of india the petitioner has challenged...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 16 2000 (HC)

Majlis-e-millia, Dargah-e-hazrath ShamsuddIn Auliya Trust, Bangarpet V ...

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Mar-16-2000

Reported in: 2001(1)KarLJ126

order1 petitioners 1 to 4 claiming to be the founder trustees of a registered trust known as majlis e millia...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 15 2000 (SC)

Commissioner of Trade Tax, U.P. Vs. M/S Upper Doab Sugar Mills Ltd.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-15-2000

Reported in: JT2000(3)SC355; 2000(2)SCALE405; (2000)3SCC676; [2000]2SCR457; [2000]118STC422(SC)

s rajendra babu j 1 in these batch of cases the question for consideration is the interpretation of section 39...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2000 (SC)

Sudarshan Nath and ors. Vs. the State of Punjab and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-04-2000

Reported in: JT2000(4)SC148; (2000)126PLR542; 2000(3)SCALE57; (2000)4SCC34; [2000]2SCR927

doraiswamy raju j 1 the appellants who are the legal representatives of the original landholder raghubinder nath and were unsuccessful...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Apr 04 2000 (SC)

State of Andhra Pradesh Vs. Manjeti Laxmi Kantha Rao (D) by L.Rs. and ...

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Apr-04-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC2220; 2000(3)ALLMR(SC)664; 2001(1)BLJR473; JT2000(4)SC157; 2000(3)SCALE61; (2000)3SCC689; [2000]2SCR937

s rajendra babu j 1 these appeals arise out of a suit brought by manjeti venkata nagabhushana rao and manjeti...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Mar 28 2000 (SC)

P. Anand Gajapathi Raju and ors. Vs. P.V.G. Raju (Died) and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Mar-28-2000

Reported in: JT2000(4)SC590; (2000)3MLJ69(SC); 2000(3)SCALE330; (2000)4SCC539; [2000]2SCR684; 2000(2)LC1138(SC)

order1 no orders on i as 3 and 4 2 during the pendency of this appeal all the parties have...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Feb 28 2000 (SC)

State of Maharashtra Vs. Laljit Rajshi Shah and ors.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Decided on: Feb-28-2000

Reported in: AIR2000SC937; 2000(1)ALD(Cri)720; 2000CriLJ1494; JT2000(2)SC546; 2000(2)SCALE126; (2000)2SCC699; [2000]1SCR1239; 2000(2)LC915(SC)

g b pattanaik j 1 these appeals by grant of leave by the high court itself under article 134 1...

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

Jul 14 2000 (HC)

Gayathri Vs. Indira Rajashekar

Court: Karnataka

Decided on: Jul-14-2000

Reported in: ILR2000KAR3002; 2000(6)KarLJ80

..... settled before commencement of the hearing of the appeal the appellant was entitled to the refund claimed under section 66 c of the karnataka court fees and suits valuation act 1958 ..... legislature while enacting the beneficial provisions of section 66 which entitles the litigant to claim refund in certain situations mentioned therein secondly because a hearing within the comprehension of section 66 .....

Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT

  • << Prev.

Sign-up to get more results

Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.

Start Free Trial

Save Judgments// Add Notes // Store Search Result sets // Organize Client Files //