Refrain - Judgment Search Results

Sheo Pershan Singh Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh

Court: Allahabad

Reported in: 1979CriLJ517

m m gupta j 1 this appeal presents a picture of grim tragedy in which fourteen persons lost their lives...

Mrs. Maneka Gandhi Vs. Union of India (Uoi) and anr.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC597; (1978)1SCC248; [1978]2SCR621

..... the territory of india at the end of article 19 1 a they have deliberately refrained from using any words of limitation then are we going to supply these words and .....

Lakeside Vs. Oregon

Court: US Supreme Court

lakeside v oregon 435 u s 333 1978 u s supreme court lakeside v oregon 435 u s 333 1978...

Monell Vs. Department of Soc. Svcs.

Court: US Supreme Court

monell v department of soc svcs 436 u s 658 1978 u s supreme court monell v department of soc...

Sunil Batra Vs. Delhi Administration and ors. Etc.

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1675; AIR1980SC1579; 1978CriLJ1741; 1980CriLJ1099; (1978)4SCC494; (1980)3SCC488; [1979]1SCR392; [1980]2SCR557

krishna iyer j 1 the province of prison justice the conceptualization of freedom behind bars and the role of judicial...

In Re: the Special Courts Bill, 1978

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1979SC478; (1979)1SCC380; [1979]2SCR476

..... with or without amendment 6 the reference raises a purely political question which we should refrain from answering and 7 considering the repercussions of the exercise of advisory jurisdiction both expediency .....

Pinkus Vs. United States

Court: US Supreme Court

pinkus v united states 436 u s 293 1978 u s supreme court pinkus v united states 436 u s...

Fcc Vs. Pacifica Foundation

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 1464 1976 ed must be construed to prohibit only obscene speech i would therefore normally refrain from expressing my views on any constitutional issues implicated in this case however i find ..... regulation is permissible footnote 3 4 the opinions of my brothers powell and stevens rightly refrain from relying on the notion of spectrum scarcity to support their result as chief judge .....

Regents of Univ. of California Vs. Bakke

Court: US Supreme Court

..... 309 said that the government has any greater interest in helping one individual than in refraining from harming another thus the government has no compelling justification for inflicting such harm ..... davis been guilty of invidious racial discrimination or if a federal statute mandated that universities refrain from applying any admissions policy that had a disparate and unjustified racial impact see .....

Madhav Hayawadanrao Hoskot Vs. State of Maharashtra

Court: Supreme Court of India

Reported in: AIR1978SC1548; 1978CriLJ1678; (1978)3SCC544; [1979]1SCR192; 1978(10)LC847(SC)

krishna iyer j 1 a short paragraph might perhaps have been sufficient as obituary note on this special leave petition...