Reading - Judgment Search Results
Home > Cases Phrase: reading Year: 2002 Page 1 of about 603 results (0.092 seconds)Ajai Kumar Pathak Vs. Regional Institute of Technology and ors.
Court: Jharkhand
Decided on: May-17-2002
Reported in: [2003(1)JCR577(Jhr)]
s j mukhopadhaya j 1 the writ petition was preferred by petitioner challenging the appointment of 4th respondent mr sanjay...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. M.K. Gaur and ors. Vs. State of Rajasthan and anr.
Court: Rajasthan
Decided on: Apr-26-2002
Reported in: RLW2003(2)Raj870; 2002(3)WLC367; 2002(5)WLN82
..... if the commission receive intimation to that effect before selection plain reading of rule 20 makes it clear that the commission had ..... government within the existence of reserve list the proviso must be read to cover the select list which has been prepared under ..... amp 20 proviso interpretation service appointment reserve list proviso must be read to cover the select list which has been prepared under .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTUttam Gulati (Dr.) (Mrs.) Vs. State of Uttar Pradesh, Through the Spec ...
Court: Allahabad
Decided on: Oct-03-2002
Reported in: (2003)1UPLBEC229
..... of the petitioner as ggic 4 the relevant part of order dated 2 5 96 reads as below for the reasons given above this writ petition is allowed with costs the ..... order dated 18 7 1999 annexure 8 the high court d b has observed which reads as below the short point involved in this petitioner is as to whether the petitioner .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShah Jolly Chandravadan and ors. Vs. State of Gujarat and ors.
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jul-15-2002
Reported in: (2003)2GLR1190
..... there is improvement in educational qualification for the very same post reading certain relevant part of the advertisement dated 15 6 1998 he ..... candidates by the g p s c relevant paras 4 5 read as under 4 mr gopal subramaniam learned senior counsel appearing ..... a denial and deprivation of the constitutional right under article 14 read with article 16 1 of the constitution the appointment therefore of .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTShri P.V. Narasimha Rao Vs. State Through Cbi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Mar-15-2002
Reported in: 2002CriLJ2401; 97(2002)DLT452; 2002(63)DRJ331
..... was covered in the present case in fact on reading the judgment of the high court it is apparent to us that the ..... though substantive charges had been framed against the accused read with section 34 or alternatively with section 149 ipc the trial court has ..... be guilty of charge under section 120 b ipc read with sections 12 5 2 read with section 15 1 d of the prevention of corruption act 1988 .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTAdhunik Food Products Vs. Commissioner of Central Excise
Court: Customs Excise and Service Tax Appellate Tribunal CESTAT Delhi
Decided on: Jun-10-2002
Reported in: (2002)(82)ECC324
..... declarations is the same as what is contained in the exemption notifications read with the tariff and the change in the interpretation of the same ..... for the appellant submits that the chapter note 9 of chapter 21 reads heading no 21 08 inter alia includes b preparations for use either ..... incorporated in para 40 e accordingly para 40 e is amended to read as penalty on shri r n goel abates penalty on the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTNaresh Trikamlal Brahmbhatt Vs. State of Gujarat
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Feb-13-2002
Reported in: (2003)1GLR835
..... contained in paragraphs 18 19 and 22 of the said judgment which reads as under 18 a list of 70 candidates was recommended by the ..... contained in paragraph 16 of the aforesaid decision the said paragraph 16 reads as under 16 inordinate delay is not merely a factor for the ..... contained in paragraphs 18 19 and 22 of the said judgment which reads as under 18 a list of 70 candidates was recommended by the .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTGujarat State Co-op. Land Development Bank Ltd. and anr. Vs. Dy. Secre ...
Court: Gujarat
Decided on: Jan-10-2002
Reported in: (2002)3GLR596
p b majmudar j 1 petitioner no 1 is a co operative land development bank respondents 2 to 4 were...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTDr. Jai Hari Agarwal Vs. University of Delhi
Court: Delhi
Decided on: Apr-09-2002
Reported in: 2002IVAD(Delhi)463; 100(2002)DLT144
manmohan sarin j 1 the petitioner dr jai hari jai aggarwal by the present writ petition seeks a writ of...
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPTBarnhart Vs. Walton
Court: US Supreme Court
Decided on: Mar-27-2002
..... engenders and the consequent need for agency expertise and administrative experience lead the court to read the statute as delegating to the agency considerable authority to fill in matters of ..... it engenders and the consequent need for agency expertise and administrative experience lead us to read the statute as delegating to the agency considerable authority to fill in through interpretation .....
Tag this Judgment! Ask ChatGPT- << Prev.
- Next >>
Sign-up to get more results
Unlock complete result pages and premium legal research features.
Start Free Trial